Right. With the way
@TasteofUConn is carrying on about how bad the Warriors are I'm not sure he's ever seen Love and Irving defend a pick and roll.
Undoubtedly, Cleveland is better with Irving and Love in the lineup...and them being there is probably the difference between LeBron scoring 40 a game on 40% shooting and 26 a game on 50% shooting. But those two are minus players defensively, and against a pick and roll bomb shell like Golden State, you really don't want your one and your four to be minus defensive players.
There will be a lot of hollering about how limited Cleveland is - and they are - but what they won't tell you is how Golden State forces coaches into inconvenient personnel decisions that don't quite jive with what people are seeing. They can't play Mozgov as much as they want because plodding big men are death against the Warriors, especially when forced to deal the smaller carnations of their lineup. The cross-matches have ended with him guarding Iguodola, and his ability to read the floor both in isolation plays and pick and rolls simply makes that untenable for Cleveland. The off-ball adventures of guys like Smith are far more costly against a team like the Warriors - if Cleveland's entire lineup was intact, they would have to make some difficult decisions regarding where to hide Love and Irving.
The Cavs were never winning this series without Irving and Love. With them, they may well have. But, while it's true that Golden State has been granted the injury variable to an extreme I can't remember any other champion ever be afforded, they're about to finish up the postseason 16-5. That may not be dominant, but it isn't far from it, and their combination of depth and versatility allowed them to adjust to any lineup configuration thrown at them all year, and that would have been the case even with injury mode being off.