CL82
NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 59,850
- Reaction Score
- 224,286
So you are telling me there's a chan....The chance of #2 happening is approximately 0% . . .
Awww, never mind.
So you are telling me there's a chan....The chance of #2 happening is approximately 0% . . .
There are 4 ways to read this, if it is true:
1) If UConn wants to make more money, joining the Big East for all sports but football is the best option.
2) If UConn wants to be P5 someday, joining the Big East for all sports but football is the best option.
3) If UConn wants to save the hoops program, joining the Big East for all sports but football is the best option.
4) If UConn wants to de-emphasize football, joining the Big East for all sports but football is the best option.
There is no objective that UConn could have that would be more achievable by staying in the AAC vs. going to the Big East.
That said, the Rothstein article smells like clickbait to me.
How big a chance? Based on what? I can't see a way for either to make money off it, absent ESPN suddenly deciding to be magnanimous.I still believe UConn has a chance to get into the ACC or the B!G. And I believe that putting UConn into the BE for bb eliminates the small chance remaining.
my point exactly, one nationally televised game on ESPN against powerhouse temple. That sounds about right for a program who has the most national championships since the turn of the century[/QUOTE]ESPN: Temple
CBS: SMU, Cincinnati
FOX: @ Georgetown
ESPN2: Chaminade, Oregon, Syracuse, Auburn, Houston, @ Memphis, @ SMU, @ Cincinnati, vs Memphis
ESPNU: Ok State, @ USF, Tulane, @ ECU
CBSSN: @ Houston, @ UCF, USF, ECU, Temple, UCF, @ Tulsa
BTN: @ Ohio State
SNY: Wagner, Northeastern, @ LMU, Boston U, North Florida
I was responding in relationship to program success not fan interest. There is a slight advantage by excitement level with more fans in the seats, but the numbers in attendance haven't dropped significantly enough to move that needle. The conjecture by some that it will is most certainly possible. But I believe that when UConn returns to its successful ways all this conversation will be moot.Oh I think it hurts. I think it hurts fan interest. Not winning enough affects that too, but the teams in the AAC hold almost no fan appeal apart from Cinci, and maybe Memphis and Temple. We certainly can't easily travel to road games.
I doubt very much the AAC can ever "leap" over the NBE, even if it can close the gap a bit.
That said, I can't support UConn doing anything that would damage football.
ESPN bro, ESPN......How exactly do you equate that to one nationally televised game? Does CBS not count as a national network anymore? But sure lets pay $15m so we can play on the thriving national networks of Fox Sports 1 and Fox Sports 2.
You edited your post after I posted my response.ESPN bro, ESPN.
Read my original post on the subject, I always referenced ESPN, but if you want to be that guy, go right ahead buddyYou edited your post after I posted my response.
Is this a fact or speculation?Uconn gave the Big 12 a option of fb only,
Valid points. What are your thoughts on the exit fee? Cost of doing business.We need to think of men's basketball FIRST as that is the only program that earns a profit for UCONN. The football team is a drain on finances and even the women's program with all their success is 2.5 million in the red. We need to be proactive as that is the only way we would possibly be invited to a P-5 conference. We need to get Cinci onboard as I said repeatedly and make this a combo deal to the Big East for basketball to force both the AAC's hand and ESPN's to what they want to do regarding UCONN athletics and to a lesser extent Cinci's. For us its a win-win by playing in the BEAST a much better basketball conference top to bottom that would rival the ACC and football would still have a decent home. The money would be much better and higher as well.
This is the only way we are getting into a P-5 conference in all sports by forcing ESPN's hand via the BEAST and Fox to compel the ACC to accept us a full partner. If not so be it basketball will be saved and football will continue in the AAC. Let's stop the wishful thinking of wait and see approach as we have missed the realignment train 4 times if you include the Big 12 fake expansion. We are past the 3 strikes and your out.
Fact.Is this a fact or speculation?
I respect your opinion and some of the others who disagree with me. I'm only presenting something for people to consider as opposed to insisting people agree with me. Half the time, as a moderator, I'm actually approving people's entry to this forum when they're debating me or worse.If we look at the average seeding an AAC team receives for the tournament, then yes the AAC is not only hurting us but Cincy and smu as well. Hell look at L'ville and us in 2014, both were way under seeded (granted that helped us in 2014) but the fact remains that no one respects the american, and I doubt they ever will. When was the last time we played on ESPN? Instead we're relegated to espnu on Thursday or some obscure time on the wknd (No Big Mondays in our future)We get no national attention and neither does any team in our conf, no matter how well a team may be doing in the reg season. Before Cincy dropped a game to smu, they were left off the top 16 seeds..why?... My guess the AAC.
I respect your optimism, I just don't agree with it.
I don't have data but I would doubt the NBE is spending as much as the AAC with regards to bb facility improvements and coaching hires. And this is why I think the AAC will leap over the NBE in the future.Oh I think it hurts. I think it hurts fan interest. Not winning enough affects that too, but the teams in the AAC hold almost no fan appeal apart from Cinci, and maybe Memphis and Temple. We certainly can't easily travel to road games.
I doubt very much the AAC can ever "leap" over the NBE, even if it can close the gap a bit.
That said, I can't support UConn doing anything that would damage football.
Cheers to you, here's hoping you and the rest of us can see UConn playing with the top of the sport(s) before we all have box seats up top.I respect your opinion and some of the others who disagree with me. I'm only presenting something for people to consider as opposed to insisting people agree with me. Half the time, as a moderator, I'm actually approving people's entry to this forum when they're debating me or worse.
I understand your point about the lack of respect which is why I'm arguing strongly about this issue. The P5 have a disproportionate power advantage to all the remaining universities. My entire thinking is predicated on the ability of UConn to get into a P5 conference. As things currently stand I don't think any non P5 conference will be relevant in twenty years and that includes the NBE. So the short term gain to the bb program, as significant as it may be, will be at the detriment to any P5 inclusion imo. As an aside, when I discussed not getting into the Big 12 with JSM, it was because of the same long term picture. The Big 12 is ready to collapse and UConn would be hurt by this collapse if it were to get a Big 12 collapse if nothing else was in play. I think a strong AAC development along with getting the UConn men's bb and football programs to a state of success will be the best chance of getting an invite to either the ACC or the B!G which is where I'd like to see UConn land.
Now I'm approaching 70. The clock is ticking for me more than most of you young uns. You can be certain that I'm debating in my head the desire for immediate satisfaction over the long term satisfaction my scenario is considering. There's a possibility I may have sky box seats by the time that arrives. But I've always considered the long term in my evaluation process and will sacrifice short term happiness if it negates long term success or if the long term success can end up with a significantly better outcome. Obviously the best case is short term and long term success. That's what I got when I met the gal I ended up marrying 42 years ago.
"my point exactly, one nationally televised game against powerhouse temple. That sounds about right for a program who has the most national championships since the turn of the century"
@sammydabiz
How exactly do you equate that to one nationally televised game? Does CBS not count as a national network anymore? But sure lets pay $15m so we can play on the thriving national networks of Fox Sports 1 and Fox Sports 2.
Fact.
From the "Response to Big 12 Due Diligence" PDF here, on page 19: Big 12 Records | University of Connecticut
iii. Willingness to consider a football-only membership and competitive plans for other sports programs in that scenario.
UConn would accept football-only membership, and subsequently would pursue membership in the Big East Conference for other sponsored sports currently competing in the American Athletic Conference (AAC).
1) If UConn wants to make more money, joining the Big East for all sports but football is the best option.
2) If UConn wants to be P5 someday, joining the Big East for all sports but football is the best option.
3) If UConn wants to save the hoops program, joining the Big East for all sports but football is the best option.
4) If UConn wants to de-emphasize football, joining the Big East for all sports but football is the best option.
I am assuming it is not possible for just men and womens bball to join?
The old BE foes would be great, but anyone selling this as a return to the old BE with little travel has never heard of Omaha, Milwaukee, Indiana, Chicago and, yes, Cincy, Ohio.