PATS!!!!!!!! | Page 9 | The Boneyard

PATS!!!!!!!!

UConn990411 said:
Here's a fun little experiment:

Go find one of those long Giants threads, and see how many posts were made by non-Giants fans. Then, compare it to how many posts in this thread were made by non-Pats fans.

What's even funnier is how a lotta the non-Pats fans in this thread insist they don't hate the Patriots. You're not fooling anyone.
Expand ...

Ok good thought, you do it ok? Nice idea get me the stats can't wait.;)
 
FartMan69 said:
We're so much better than every organization in the league it's almost comical at this point. The amount of real estate BB owns in the heads of coaches around the league is enough to have its own area code. You just have to watch and wait for the opposing coaching staff to do something fatally stupid because of who's on the other sideline. JV vs Varsity each week.
Expand ...

Wow, this may be the most arrogant one ShartMan.:eek: Appreciate the support though, good timing.
 
upstater said:
I said they weren't deflated by the two Doinks on that day. If they had, the balls wouldn't have come in exactly right where you'd expect them with no manual deflation.

I even said they may have deflated balls in the past, but not that day.

I then said that there were 3 texts mentioning "deflate" or "deflator." One text exonerated Brady. Another text mentioned deflate in relation to the puffy jacket (or, help me out, what is your interpretation of the link above? I see no one has even bothered to offer an alternative scenario to that text), and the third text, "deflator," was in the spring of the preceding year. If you read text 3 in this string, when Brady first found out about NFL rules regarding proper inflation, then the reading of text 1 doesn't make sense.

Besides, even if they were deflating balls in prior games, the balls were not deflated for the AFCCG.
Expand ...

Ahhhh. Got it now. Makes perfect sense. He's The Deflator because of a puffy jacket. Or because he worked out and needed to lose weight. Not because he was responsible for handling the footballs and joked about giving Tom Brady "balloons" when Brady complained the footballs were too inflated once. Thanks for finally clearing this one up.
 
Deepster said:
Ahhhh. Got it now. Makes perfect sense. He's The Deflator because of a puffy jacket. Or because he worked out and needed to lose weight. Not because he was responsible for handling the footballs and joked about giving Tom Brady "balloons" when Brady complained the footballs were too inflated once. Thanks for finally clearing this one up.
Expand ...

Did he also deflate Brady's iPhone? Must've been him he's seems to very efficient.
 
.-.
Deepster said:
No. It was the part about rewatching it and thinking they couldn't win and that you dreamt it. That was the queer part.
Expand ...
And I dreamt you would know I was kidding. I have the strangest dreams.
 
Deepster said:
Ahhhh. Got it now. Makes perfect sense. He's The Deflator because of a puffy jacket. Or because he worked out and needed to lose weight. Not because he was responsible for handling the footballs and joked about giving Tom Brady "balloons" when Brady complained the footballs were too inflated once. Thanks for finally clearing this one up.
Expand ...

You mentioned the one text that exonerated Brady? Interesting. The balloons text came after the Jets game in October. In those texts, he told Brady the balls were at 16 PSI (the refs apparently don't really even pay attention to what they set the ball at). Brady told him he better never allow that to happen again. That's when he told Brady that the refs are the ones who set the balls at the final PSI. And this is why we see the text from Brady, "Then bring 'in rulebook and show it to them next time!" So--Brady didn't know the rule on this until October? Pretty interesting.

You still haven't addressed the "jacket" text from the Green Bay game. What do you think that text meant?

I see you Patriot haters won't even go near answering that one.

Apparently, after 4 days of interrogation by FBI, these diabolical geniuses didn't get tripped up once. The nation is apparently in great hands with FBI like that.
 
FartMan69 said:
Goodell made me like this. #wearebetterthanyou
Expand ...

I know twice he watched Coughlin and nothing fatally stupid happened unless it was BB's end? Was I missing something, does he make some tremble at the sight of BB? Must have missed it in the 2 I watched the closest I guess. Still wondering how he's going to adjust to the rich of Tuck, Umi and Michael? Oh my bad, he didn't!;)
 
upstater said:
You mentioned the one text that exonerated Brady? Interesting. The balloons text came after the Jets game in October. In those texts, he told Brady the balls were at 16 PSI (the refs apparently don't really even pay attention to what they set the ball at). Brady told him he better never allow that to happen again. That's when he told Brady that the refs are the ones who set the balls at the final PSI. And this is why we see the text from Brady, "Then bring 'in rulebook and show it to them next time!" So--Brady didn't know the rule on this until October? Pretty interesting.

You still haven't addressed the "jacket" text from the Green Bay game. What do you think that text meant?

I see you Patriot haters won't even go near answering that one.

Apparently, after 4 days of interrogation by FBI, these diabolical geniuses didn't get tripped up once. The nation is apparently in great hands with FBI like that.
Expand ...


Did New England Patriots edit out important 'Deflator' reference in Deflategate response?
 
.-.
Never thought Brady actually got in trouble for deflating footballs, which to me is much ado about nothing. Always thought Roger was pissed about him destroying the phone. Kind of like Watergate, where it was the coverup, not the actual crime, that brought Nixon down. If Brady hands over the phone, I can't see how Roger could have done much more than fine him. After the flack about him destroying the Spygate tapes, Roger was going to be super sensitive about evidence being destroyed.
 
mauconnfan said:
Deep c'mon this was is wayyyy too simple, it's about losing weight no shot of it being about deflating balls. You're so unfair!:eek:
Expand ...

Edit out? Huh? It was in the Wells report.

You guys still haven't explained what it referred to. Are you saying "Deflate and hand me that jacket!" was about deflating balls? Is that what you're saying?
 
A10 fan said:
Never thought Brady actually got in trouble for deflating footballs, which to me is much ado about nothing. Always thought Roger was pissed about him destroying the phone. Kind of like Watergate, where it was the coverup, not the actual crime, that brought Nixon down. If Brady hands over the phone, I can't see how Roger could have done much more than fine him. After the flack about him destroying the Spygate tapes, Roger was going to be super sensitive about evidence being destroyed.
Expand ...

The phone issue came up in the appeal.

He had already banned him for 4 games in the initial ruling. The Wells report said Brady fully cooperated on the phone. It was months later during the appeal when Brady's lawyer told them they destroyed the phone.
 
upstater said:
Edit out? Huh? It was in the Wells report.

You guys still haven't explained what it referred to. Are you saying "Deflate and hand me that jacket!" was about deflating balls? Is that what you're saying?
Expand ...

You have all the answers to this drama up, not me as I'm guessing you were with the ball boys at all times. So I'll go with you on this, because you have to be there to actually know the answer to this and so many other questions. Did TB have you destroy the phone too?
 
.-.
mauconnfan said:
You have all the answers to this drama up, not me as I'm guessing you were with the ball boys at all times. So I'll go with you on this, because you have to be there to actually know the answer to this and so many other questions. Did TB have you destroy the phone too?
Expand ...

You guy refuse to answer the question and I know why.
 
upstater said:
You guy refuse to answer the question and I know why.
Expand ...

What question is it I'm just reading Deeps stuff you think I have time to read them all? I'm just wondering why anyone even cares, but still having fun with it. Really what's the question?
 
It's funny, the Atlanta coaches are rightly being ripped to shreds for leaving the door open for the Pats to charge through, but wtf were the Pats thinking trying to throw that fade on first and goal from the 2 in overtime? The Falcon nearly picked it off. BB would have been raked over the coals if that had happened, and the Pats lost. Especially since the Pats had a front row seat to see a similar play backfire in Super Bowl 49. Obviously they came to their senses on the next play.
 
A10 fan said:
It's funny, the Atlanta coaches are rightly being ripped to shreds for leaving the door open for the Pats to charge through, but wtf were the Pats thinking trying to throw that fade on first and goal from the 2 in overtime? The Falcon nearly picked it off. BB would have been raked over the coals if that had happened, and the Pats lost. Especially since the Pats had a front row seat to see a similar play backfire in Super Bowl 49. Obviously they came to their senses on the next play.
Expand ...

I didn't think it was the worst play call. They do that all the time, though usually to gronk.

That said, it was a bad throw on Brady's part. You gotta throw it just long out of bounds, so the receiver can tow tap or the ball over shoots out of bounds. Defender shouldn't have a chance.
 
mauconnfan said:
What question is it I'm just reading Deeps stuff you think I have time to read them all? I'm just wondering why anyone even cares, but still having fun with it. Really what's the question?
Expand ...

The text that read "Deflate and hand someone that jacket."
Is it about deflated balls?
 
.-.
upstater said:
The text that read "Deflate and hand someone that jacket."
Is it about deflated balls?
Expand ...
Why does it bother you so much at this point? Haters gonna hate. Since that day in question, they've won another 2 Lombardi trophies. If he wins one more, he will single handedly won more than any franchise except the Steelers.
 
upstater said:
No, I don't, but I do know it's not about footballs.
Expand ...

How? Again only way was you are Upstater Jaztremski or something. Otherwise you have no idea, it could be footballs or a puffy jacket.
 
noeynox said:
Why does it bother you so much at this point? Haters gonna hate. Since that day in question, they've won another 2 Lombardi trophies. If he wins one more, he will single handedly won more than any franchise except the Steelers.
Expand ...

Another "hater" what dopes!
 
A10 fan said:
It's funny, the Atlanta coaches are rightly being ripped to shreds for leaving the door open for the Pats to charge through, but wtf were the Pats thinking trying to throw that fade on first and goal from the 2 in overtime? The Falcon nearly picked it off. BB would have been raked over the coals if that had happened, and the Pats lost. Especially since the Pats had a front row seat to see a similar play backfire in Super Bowl 49. Obviously they came to their senses on the next play.
Expand ...

It's easy to say in hindsight, but I don't think that was a terrible call. The Patriots had Blount and Develin in the backfield, so they were telegraphing a running play. They went with a pass to Bennett, who was being covered by a Beasley. Beasley is primarily a pass rusher, had one pass defensed all season, and is 5 inches shorter than Bennett. Beasley should get more credit being able to knock the ball away with his left in that situation.
 
StoweD210 said:
It's easy to say in hindsight, but I don't think that was a terrible call. The Patriots had Blount and Develin in the backfield, so they were telegraphing a running play. They went with a pass to Bennett, who was being covered by a Beasley. Beasley is primarily a pass rusher, had one pass defensed all season, and is 5 inches shorter than Bennett. Beasley should get more credit being able to knock the ball away with his left in that situation.
Expand ...

Yep. Bad throw plus great defense. I'm glad he doesn't have much experience catching a football. Would have been a shame to get Malcom Butlered there. Course, the game wouldn't have been over, but still...
 
.-.
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,349
Messages
4,566,436
Members
10,468
Latest member
ADD3LA


Top Bottom