joober jones
Finally Non-Fat Guy
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2011
- Messages
- 4,734
- Reaction Score
- 9,646
I miss the days when you'd see junior and senior dominated lottery picks. I suppose you can't go back.
I'm a Knicks fan actually but am beyond intrigued with the Celts current situation. They have robbed and swindled inferior GM's and hit an absolute home run with Stevens. Wide open window and can be competitive until they have the team to overtake the east. Meanwhile Phil is driving the clown mobile into a mulberry bush.
I miss the days when you'd see junior and senior dominated lottery picks. I suppose you can't go back.
Hmm, I was basing the statement off of ESPN's infographic showing the Celtics' cap situation next year if they took Fultz #1 and it said MK $7M and IT $6.3, maybe I misread it.Not true. The number one pick from last year's draft made $4.9 million this past season (NBA Rookie Scale - RealGM). That will go up some. IT's current contract will pay him $6,261,395 next season (Isaiah Thomas).
Agreed but the talent hasn't come together yet to produce contenders like Boston or even Milwaukee who are both already good and in great positions to take over after the Cavs run. I expect Philly to make that jump once they're young talent is fully healthy and fits their roles.Philly is in fantastic position
The Bulls were not trading Butler last summer or at the deadline. It was not the Celtics who did not pull the trigger.If the Celts didn't trade the pick for Butler when it was just a % to be #1 I can't imagine they'd deal now when it is the #1 pick.
Disagree. Their one potential star from the tanking has played 31 games in 3 years. Great position with the cap but do you honestly think a true max level player will sign there with the current state of the team?Philly is in fantastic position
Disagree. Their one potential star from the tanking has played 31 games in 3 years. Great position with the cap but do you honestly think a true max level player will sign there with the current state of the team?
The Bulls were not trading Butler last summer or at the deadline. It was not the Celtics who did not pull the trigger.
Actually I believe it can be done.What river connects Brooklyn to Nashville?
Sixers get lakers pick next year. It's unprotected. And in 2019 it goes to the Magic.
As a Nets fan, this is all I can hope for.I'm praying that the Lakers pass on Ball. Lavar would ERUPT! Would be so funny.
Unprotected Lakers pick to Philly next year, but since it didn't convey this year, it would have to be 2 years from next year for Magic (Stepien rule). BUT, because of that, the Magic pick becomes 2 #2s instead of the #1 due to a stipulation in the trade about when it could convey. That's why this top 3 was so big for the Lakers, it's a triple whammy: 1) Get a top 3 pick. 2) Convey presumably a worse pick to Sixers next year. 3) Keep the Magic-owed #1.
Nope, but if you want to believe that fine. But you are wrong and people who report the sport for a living has made that clear.It was absolutely the Celts who didn't pull the trigger.
Philly is in fantastic position[/QUA
Philly is in fantastic position
After the Lebron era, we're going to see a Philly v. Celts rivalry really blossom. The amount of young talent on both teams is mind-boggling and should carry out for years to come
100% agree on Simmons. I also think Saric has potential to be a very solid NBA player, but I am not convinced they can get FAs or that Embiid can stay on the court for a full season (and he is only under contract for 2 more years).Wouldn't write off Simmons yet. I def see him as having star potential.
As a Knicks fan, I'm hoping Dennis Smith Jr. falls to #8.

100% agree on Simmons. I also think Saric has potential to be a very solid NBA player, but I am not convinced they can get FAs or that Embiid can stay on the court for a full season (and he is only under contract for 2 more years).
I would be surprised if Issac is not a top 7 pick.Consider this nightmare scenario:
1) Celtics - Fultz
2) Lakers - Ball
3) 76ers - Tatum
4) Suns - Jackson
5) Kings - Fox
6) Magic - Smith
7) Timberwolves - Monk
8) Knicks - ?
Who do you take then? The PG from France? Jonathon Issac? Collins from Gonzaga? I really want Fox or Smith but fear both will be gone.![]()
Consider this nightmare scenario:
1) Celtics - Fultz
2) Lakers - Ball
3) 76ers - Tatum
4) Suns - Jackson
5) Kings - Fox
6) Magic - Smith
7) Timberwolves - Monk
8) Knicks - ?
Who do you take then? The PG from France? Jonathon Issac? Collins from Gonzaga? I really want Fox or Smith but fear both will be gone.![]()
No matter what "sell high" means, you won't get a player back nearly as good. And whoever ends up with the best player, wins the trade. Plus, the Celtics are Charlotte or Atlanta without IT.This is why you sell high on IT. You elongate the window to wait out Lebron.
I think they should have the space too if they dropped Olynyk. If this is wrong, blame Lowe. Danny has a crazy couple of years ahead of him. There is no way they end up with a non-great team, but they are the strong favorite to be the big guy in the East post-Lebron (and maybe concurrently) if Ainge can make a few correct moves.
yeah, drop a guy who just scored 26 points in a game 7. The Celts have lots of good players. They can trade them, but Olnyk is a valuable guy.
Not if you use the money you have to to max out IT on Hayward, Lowry, or Griffin.No matter what "sell high" means, you won't get a player back nearly as good. And whoever ends up with the best player, wins the trade. Plus, the Celtics are Charlotte or Atlanta without IT.
If it's Hayward vs Olnyk, you take Hayward 100/100. I know they don't play the same position, but it doesn't matter in this scenario.
Sure. Just saying that you package him and trade him, rather than drop him. I think he's a better player than most people realize, and I think Ainge knows that.
Would you trade Crowder for Porter straight up? I would.