Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell. | Page 960 | The Boneyard

Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell.

I don’t think the idea of an ACC-NBE merger makes any sense. If, and I doubt it would happen, the ACC added NBE teams, it would cherry pick. If you have UConn along with BC you don’t have any need for Providence. If you have St John’s and Villanova why give money to Seton Hall. Maybe you want Marquette but not Butler or Creighton. None of it makes sense, but taking everyone makes the least sense of all.

You are right. The ACC is absolutely crushing it as is. Why make any changes?
 
I don’t think the idea of an ACC-NBE merger makes any sense. If, and I doubt it would happen, the ACC added NBE teams, it would cherry pick. If you have UConn along with BC you don’t have any need for Providence. If you have St John’s and Villanova why give money to Seton Hall. Maybe you want Marquette but not Butler or Creighton. None of it makes sense, but taking everyone makes the least sense of all.
You are forgetting what made the Big East successful in the first place. If you have bcu, then you need pc. local rivalries trump distant markets.
It doesn’t really matter who you leave in or out of the new K Superconference since it has absolutely no chance of ever happening.
Season 4 Episode 20 GIF by Friends
 
I don’t think the idea of an ACC-NBE merger makes any sense. If, and I doubt it would happen, the ACC added NBE teams, it would cherry pick. If you have UConn along with BC you don’t have any need for Providence. If you have St John’s and Villanova why give money to Seton Hall. Maybe you want Marquette but not Butler or Creighton. None of it makes sense, but taking everyone makes the least sense of all.

It doesn’t make any sense for the Big East. Leaving a round robin conference of like-minded schools to merge with a 18-school conference that lost any semblance of reason a long time ago. God knows where the conference tournament would be yearly, or how many schools would be included. I would not want to see UConn in it, so I cannot imagine schools like Nova or Georgetown wanting any part of it.

It may not be ideal for UConn long term, but the other schools in the Big East are pretty happy with it.
 
End of the day...are you really in a conference with a team that you don't play annually/regularly?

A 30 team BB conference with 2 divisions would mean the annual conference schedule would be...
  • 7 home against division opponents
  • 7 road against division opponents
  • 3 home against non-division opponents
  • 3 road against non-division opponents
So ultimately...it would take 5 years to have a home and home against each non-division opponent. Also, there would be 3 non-division opponents that wouldn't be on schedule until year 3.

This of course assumes that there aren't designated 'rivalry' games between non-division opponents.

An 18 team FB conference with 2 divisions would mean zero non-division opponents.
  • 4 home against division opponents
  • 4 road against division opponents
 
look, you aren't making a league this size work, stop thinking you can. it will exist in a perilous existence until something akin to atom fission occurs.
 
The Big 12 is the intended audience for this news. This is to show that we are financially strong.
That number just seems a bit off (or this year's number is going to be much higher). The school reported about 179,000 tickets sold last year for 16 game, which works out to $18/ticket. Even if you assume 3,000 students per game (which feels high, considering Hartford), that still works out to $24/ticket.
 
I don't even understand how a merger of conferences happens. The schools just vote behind Vals back?
You should have been in the room with the "Old Big East"(hoops) AD's) when CBS announced a TV contract with the FB arm of the Big East. The Hoops AD's(including Lew Perkins) had no idea that was coming. All of a sudden the power of FB was shown in a very real way. That tail wagged the heck out of that Dog.
 

Online statistics

Members online
285
Guests online
2,989
Total visitors
3,274

Forum statistics

Threads
163,997
Messages
4,377,991
Members
10,169
Latest member
ctfb19382


.
..
Top Bottom