Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell. | Page 780 | The Boneyard

Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell.

No way B12 or ACC are top basketball conference without UConn as a member!
There is a difference between being the best conference which arguably is the ACC on a year in year out basis and having the best team in any given year. It isn’t a perfect measure but if you look a Final Fours, the ACC seems to have teams almost every year. And it isn’t just 1 team. UNC, Duke, Virginia, Miami, Syracuse and NC State have all made the final four. The last 10 tournaments,2014-2024 no 2020, ACC teams have made the Final Four 7 times. They have had 2 teams make it twice, and 6 different teams got there. 3 different teams have won the title. That suggests a league that is deep in quality on regular basis.

In any given year a conference can be up or down, but I think NCAA tournament final four runs by multiple teams indicates that the league is deeper than others.

Being the best league does not mean you have the best team. Over that same period UConn it could be argued was the best team. Even if it was playing in lesser conferences. Nobody would argue that the AAC > ACC. Even the biggest NEWBE fans would be hard pressed to argue that it is superior to the ACC, though no doubt some would try. I am not sold on the Big 12. It is also a bit tricky to evaluate them. Oklahoma made the Final Four from the B12 but isn’t there any more. Houston made it from the AAC but is now in the B12. But I don’t think it is as good as the ACC. In any given year, sure, but over time, the ACC is still #1.
 
The knee-jerk defense of every failure:
"Well we did all we could."

How do we know that? Well, because something we wanted to happen didn't happen and claiming that you "did all you could" sounds better than "we were not successful."

I'm not saying Dave could've done more, I'm just saying a sad face with the quote "we did all we could" is the family crest of failure.
What do you do when the girl says that she doesn’t want to go out with you?
 
The knee-jerk defense of every failure:
"Well we did all we could."

How do we know that? Well, because something we wanted to happen didn't happen and claiming that you "did all you could" sounds better than "we were not successful."

I'm not saying Dave could've done more, I'm just saying a sad face with the quote "we did all we could" is the family crest of failure.
Add to that to paraphrase, it was an honor to be nominated.
 
.-.
Having been married for 36 years now, I may not be the best guy for you to turn to for dating advice, but good luck to you!
IMG_20241010_204559.jpg
 
.-.
Maybe, but between now and then it's a license to print money
Is it? It is already spent and budgeted. It isn’t really new revenue. They are losing subscribers, so they increase customer base, but it is still declining.

Raw money is helpful, but this is like a corporations that acquire a bunch of companies through acquisition to showcase revenue growth.

You are essentially buying growth.
 
Is it? It is already spent and budgeted. It isn’t really new revenue. They are losing subscribers, so they increase customer base, but it is still declining.

Raw money is helpful, but this is like a corporations that acquire a bunch of companies through acquisition to showcase revenue growth.

You are essentially buying growth.
Which is it, is it spent or is it budgeted, or is it both?

What I think you're suggesting is that over time this may no longer be a viable revenue stream. That may well be true. My point is simply between now and then, it is.
 
Which is it, is it spent or is it budgeted, or is it both?

What I think you're suggesting is that over time this may no longer be a viable revenue stream. That may well be true. My point is simply between now and then, it is.
It’s a college —- budgeted is spent! Lol.

I get what you are saying. But these schools are still starved for cash. Whatever they bring in, they send out. So, at $150m in revenue, they will spend it 2-3 years after they get it.

Next thing you know, they will be on hunt for more money.
 


It’s depressing that we (the coach) need to beg people to get to this game. My conspiracy connecting the dots mind thinks the big 12 is looking for attendance numbers to increase.

We need more people at the games. There are a lot of reasons attendance has suffered. With a week off, I think it will be fun. Hard to do so many weeks in a row.
 
Was this game always a noon kickoff? I swear it was a 3:30 game. I’m disappointed. I have to go to the funeral of my aunt at 11am and presumably a reception after. I’ve been thinking it was 3:30 all along. Even saved it in my phone at some point.
 
.-.
Was this game always a noon kickoff? I swear it was a 3:30 game. I’m disappointed. I have to go to the funeral of my aunt at 11am and presumably a reception after. I’ve been thinking it was 3:30 all along. Even saved it in my phone at some point.
Schedule was released w/o times in late January and game times were released in May (Noon)
 
We need more people at the games. There are a lot of reasons attendance has suffered. With a week off, I think it will be fun. Hard to do so many weeks in a row.
Yeah a march of 6 straight is tough because I can see a lot of middle aged people have to pick and choose which weekends with their spouses and whatnot
 
We need more people at the games. There are a lot of reasons attendance has suffered. With a week off, I think it will be fun. Hard to do so many weeks in a row.
Took advantage of the e-mail over the weekend offering bogo tickets. Older son & his bride have the weekend off together & want to attend their 2nd game of the season. Two more for the tailgate crew!
 
.-.
We need more people at the games. There are a lot of reasons attendance has suffered. With a week off, I think it will be fun. Hard to do so many weeks in a row.
My brother went to IU, their coach literally wrote the same letter last week.

It’s a good, smart move.
 

Or it will not work as they think. Potential problems for lesser teams, and how will Alabama feel about adding a potential loss to, let’s say Ohio State, the schedule? Plus I’m not sure how different it is from just regular scheduling unless you have “ inter-league day” mid-season and line up the games then so you know you are getting top teams against top teams. Not so sure a 4-3 Alabama vs a 5-2 Michigan is goi g to be a huge draw. I know what they WANT to do. Just not sure it will work as they expect.
 
Or it will not work as they think. Potential problems for lesser teams, and how will Alabama feel about adding a potential loss to, let’s say Ohio State, the schedule? Plus I’m not sure how different it is from just regular scheduling unless you have “ inter-league day” mid-season and line up the games then so you know you are getting top teams against top teams. Not so sure a 4-3 Alabama vs a 5-2 Michigan is goi g to be a huge draw. I know what they WANT to do. Just not sure it will work as they expect.
Also, the tough scheduling could cost them at large bids. If Alabama ends up 8-4 they could miss the playoffs if the ACC and Big 12 have 10-2 teams under consideration.
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,555
Messages
4,582,757
Members
10,492
Latest member
7774Forever


Top Bottom