Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell. | Page 304 | The Boneyard

Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell.

Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
87,871
Reaction Score
328,549
Formality it seems. If Cox' info accurate about BYU/Cincy reps and media there

There were other tweets stating the comment about actual UC reps being there was not correct.

Yup... Cox info wasn't accurate (again):

Cincinnati Enquirer reporter there...

Jason Williams@jwilliamscincy 8 mins ago
Source: UC does NOT have a representative here in Dallas. (Not to worry. I don't believe any of the candidates do.)
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
756
Reaction Score
2,472
Being reported that's is not the correct University of Cincinnati logo from the University of Cincinnati style guide that is normally used (secondary logo). This is.
View attachment 16211

Edit - and the picture no longer exists on his twitter page.

Will Hutto ‏@LegalizeWill 11m11 minutes ago
No announcement, just speculations. Tweet was meant to excite not to inform. Please don't jump to conclusions. We'll see at 5:30.


We'll see...
The logo used is a secondary brandmark, but it's not because of the lower case, As of October 2016, the brandmark uses all uppercase, but it's still a secondary logo because the interlocking UC and Cinncinnati are on the same "line" whereas the primary logo has the UC above the text

Brand Guide
 
Joined
Jan 15, 2014
Messages
1,154
Reaction Score
258
Right at the moment, the car wash dude's postings on B12 realignment looks no less wishy " washy" than any others ( haha!)
 
Joined
Oct 15, 2016
Messages
433
Reaction Score
144
image.jpg
Guys were good
 

FfldCntyFan

Texas: Property of UConn Men's Basketball program
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
12,345
Reaction Score
42,335
So now we are at the point where the work-study print dude is breaking CR news?
He's not on work study, he's a graphic arts major and that is his mid-term project.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
87,871
Reaction Score
328,549
The logo used is a secondary brandmark, but it's not because of the lower case, As of October 2016, the brandmark uses all uppercase, but it's still a secondary logo because the interlocking UC and Cinncinnati are on the same "line" whereas the primary logo has the UC above the text

Brand Guide

Yup - grabbed wrong style guide url... thx for correcting.
 

8893

Curiouser
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,851
Reaction Score
96,512
So is it the correct logo to use for this or not?
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
842
Reaction Score
476
There would be nothing unusual about printing up something ahead of time to be ready. Every year there are thousands of t shirts and hats printed for the losers of various sporting events just in case they won and they were needed.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
756
Reaction Score
2,472
Yup - grabbed wrong style guide url... thx for correcting.
the only thing that changed URL wise was they added underscores to the pdf filename.... the fact that the old one is still available on their site means someone isnt doing a great job of cleanup
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
5,793
Reaction Score
15,797
The wrapping paper picture has been 100% debunked as incorrect. Wrong logo, user took it down and admitted it was just speculative on his end.

This tweet is rather interesting though:


Very, very odd that the commissioner would invite a member of the media in to witness the internal meetings.
 

WestHartHusk

$3M a Year With March Off
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
4,567
Reaction Score
13,712
The wrapping paper picture has been 100% debunked as incorrect. Wrong logo, user took it down and admitted it was just speculative on his end.

This tweet is rather interesting though:


Very, very odd that the commissioner would invite a member of the media in to witness the internal meetings.


Yeah, it made Bohl's a little uncomfortable to get actual news.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
756
Reaction Score
2,472
So is it the correct -ing logo to use for this or not?
It's a current logo, but per their brand page its only supposed to be used "In extreme situations where space is limited or constrained, special use options are approved on a case-by-case basis by the Branding Review Committee."
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
1,284
Reaction Score
4,917
Even odder to me that a media member offered such access at an event he's covering on-site would decline it, particularly for that reason. If something feels untoward, there might be a story there and an opportunity to break something.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
756
Reaction Score
2,472
The wrapping paper picture has been 100% debunked as incorrect. Wrong logo, user took it down and admitted it was just speculative on his end.

This tweet is rather interesting though:


Very, very odd that the commissioner would invite a member of the media in to witness the internal meetings.

Its not the wrong logo though, just the newest version that only came out this month
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
5,793
Reaction Score
15,797
Its not the wrong logo though, just the newest version that only came out this month
Yeah, that's what I meant by wrong. If the university actually printed that, there's a 0% chance they'd have printed it with old branding standards.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
756
Reaction Score
2,472
Yeah, that's what I meant by wrong. If the university actually printed that, there's a 0% chance they'd have printed it with old branding standards.
And what I am saying is the logo that is shown as printed IS correct for the Current standards, which they just updated this month, the lowercase logo is the OLD one. People were trying to say that the photo was fake because it was using the wrong logo, but it is not wrong, it is correct just so new (standards document was created less than a month ago and updated less than a week ago) people thought it was wrong
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
5,793
Reaction Score
15,797
And what I am saying is the logo that is shown as printed IS correct for the Current standards, which they just updated this month, the lowercase logo is the OLD one. People were trying to say that the photo was fake because it was using the wrong logo, but it is not wrong, it is correct just so new (standards document was created less than a month ago and updated less than a week ago) people thought it was wrong
Ah ok, I misread the tweets about it. That said, the original person who posted it already took it down claiming he was just speculating and didn't have any actual info.
 

Online statistics

Members online
453
Guests online
2,714
Total visitors
3,167

Forum statistics

Threads
157,162
Messages
4,085,923
Members
9,982
Latest member
CJasmer


Top Bottom