Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell. | Page 252 | The Boneyard

Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell.

Joined
Apr 25, 2014
Messages
5,292
Reaction Score
19,788
No, you don't need to drop track and field if you drop cross country. So you don't need to bulldoze the track facility. The logic is thus: we need to cut costs and can do so by getting to the NCAA minimum of 7 men's sports. Which sports stay? Basketball, baseball, football, soccer and hockey are the major sports in the US; they need to stay. That leaves two spots open: track and field and swimming and diving, which are the major Olympic sports not named above. Cross country is only partially an Olympic event (part of the pentathlon), golf won't be for much longer, and tennis something that you can go to local clubs for.

You should start a new thread about this.
 

Chin Diesel

Power of Love
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
32,766
Reaction Score
100,040
Joined
Nov 19, 2014
Messages
1,212
Reaction Score
1,565
He played college hoops at OSU.

Fantastic player though.

Jerry Lucas's Osu team lost to an underdog Cincy team for the Ncaa championship in i think 61 which is still a sore point for the old guard Osu fans. Oscar Robertson did not play on those Cincy national championship teams.

It's interesting as Cincy's other national player of the year was Kenyon Martin who came from of all recruiting venues................Texas. Right in the heart of Orange country.
 
Joined
Mar 4, 2014
Messages
16,818
Reaction Score
20,485
How does UConn retain its value to ESPN if they keep trashing the conference around us?
We should make Travis Rockhold our honorary embassador and fill his inbox/twitter account with our appreciation for his efforts.
 
Joined
Oct 12, 2014
Messages
376
Reaction Score
2,214
How does UConn retain its value to ESPN if they keep trashing the conference around us?

Clearly, that's our problem. UConn is like an old car that ESPN plans on driving into the ground. They figure the state will pay to have it fixed (i.e., kick in money for athletics) for as long as it can, and then when the old clunker finally breaks down for good, they'll junk it in an A-10 graveyard and move on to something else. They have probably modeled that the state will prop up UConn for a few more years before the programs start to fade beyond recognition, which is A-OK by them. It's like a hidden tax break.

How much can they make off UConn for the next couple of fiscal years? That's the only question in their eyes. ROI baby, ROI. Institutionally, they DO NOT CARE if UConn, or UConn sports, has a future beyond the end of the contract. The execs at ESPN are just trying to keep their jobs by showing profits right now.

We're a fungible good.
 

Rico444

In the mix for six
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
8,732
Reaction Score
30,556
How does UConn retain its value to ESPN if they keep trashing the conference around us?

Didn't this guy just say a week or so ago that ESPN was pushing for our inclusion in B12 expansion?
 

IMind

Wildly Inaccurate
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
1,868
Reaction Score
2,616
There's never been a bigger piece of bullsh--t than the travel issue. These are all big time athletic programs... they're already playing a national schedule. It's not going to break the bank if Texas has to fly it's baseball team out to UConn for a weekend series once a year or once every other year. Texas' tennis team's already fly all over the country. You might have a valid argument if these programs only played local teams in their non-conference schedule... but they don't.
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
57,713
Reaction Score
212,734
There's never been a bigger piece of bullsh--t than the travel issue. These are all big time athletic programs... they're already playing a national schedule. It's not going to break the bank if Texas has to fly it's baseball team out to UConn for a weekend series once a year or once every other year. Texas' tennis team's already fly all over the country. You might have a valid argument if these programs only played local teams in their non-conference schedule... but they don't.
I'm going to disagree, a little. Texas has a really sweet deal right now being able to play a huge percentage of its non-revenue sports away dates in state.

I agree it really doesn't matter for the revenue sports, especially football.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2014
Messages
1,297
Reaction Score
2,700
I'm kinda confused by a lot of the comments on here. When talking recruiting territory, people are talking about football. Most (all?) men's basketball teams have to recruit pretty broadly in the U.S. There's an uptick in the NYC area, but generally for basketball you search everywhere and anywhere. There's not too many "hot spots" for college basketball recruits.
 
Joined
Nov 19, 2014
Messages
1,212
Reaction Score
1,565
I'm kinda confused by a lot of the comments on here. When talking recruiting territory, people are talking about football. Most (all?) men's basketball teams have to recruit pretty broadly in the U.S. There's an uptick in the NYC area, but generally for basketball you search everywhere and anywhere. There's not too many "hot spots" for college basketball recruits.

It impacts both, but football more so just based on the raw number of bodies involved in the team. It definitely is a selling point, particularly for successful programs to get their product into venues to have kids see them play etc. The more big time they look, the easier to sell a recruit. That said, if the program is already successful, you could argue they do not need the reach. However, the big 12 is seen currently as lagging or slipping in national recruiting. It's also helpful if a recruit knows they will be coming back "home" for a couple games in their career. The Texas area is fertile recruiting ground, but it almost has to be with that concentration of schools. They really need to get into a larger market to keep up based on most recruiting "experts" takes.
 

IMind

Wildly Inaccurate
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
1,868
Reaction Score
2,616
I'm going to disagree, a little. Texas has a really sweet deal right now being able to play a huge percentage of its non-revenue sports away dates in state.

I agree it really doesn't matter for the revenue sports, especially football.
But they don't. Take Tennis for example they played non conference at Ohio State, Wake Forest, Washington, and San Diego. Does that seem like a program that's worried about travel costs?
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
57,713
Reaction Score
212,734
But they don't. Take Tennis for example they played non conference at Ohio State, Wake Forest, Washington, and San Diego. Does that seem like a program that's worried about travel costs?
I'm not sure you can draw much of a conclusion from nonconference away tennis games.
 

kobe

Power Conference Enjoyer (Big 12)
Joined
Apr 24, 2013
Messages
1,861
Reaction Score
9,336
Jerry Lucas's Osu team lost to an underdog Cincy team for the Ncaa championship in i think 61 which is still a sore point for the old guard Osu fans. Oscar Robertson did not play on those Cincy national championship teams.

It's interesting as Cincy's other national player of the year was Kenyon Martin who came from of all recruiting venues......Texas. Right in the heart of Orange country.
Bob Huggins recruited the area very well. We regularly had 2-3 guys on the roster from Texas. Jason Maxiell (First round pick of the Pistons in 2005) was also from Texas. Interestingly for the 2017 class, we've started recruiting Texas again...and landed a commit from one kid and are in on a few more.
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2011
Messages
12,649
Reaction Score
67,772
There's never been a bigger piece of bullsh--t than the travel issue. These are all big time athletic programs... they're already playing a national schedule. It's not going to break the bank if Texas has to fly it's baseball team out to UConn for a weekend series once a year or once every other year. Texas' tennis team's already fly all over the country. You might have a valid argument if these programs only played local teams in their non-conference schedule... but they don't.

When people bring up location who aren't idiots, it's less about travel and more about culture. Maybe some travel considerations for non-revenue sports, but mostly culture fit.
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
57,713
Reaction Score
212,734
When people bring up location who aren't idiots, it's less about travel and more about culture. Maybe some travel considerations for non-revenue sports, but mostly culture fit.
So you are saying that BYU is out?
 
Joined
Sep 27, 2011
Messages
1,406
Reaction Score
637
No, you don't need to drop track and field if you drop cross country. So you don't need to bulldoze the track facility. The logic is thus: we need to cut costs and can do so by getting to the NCAA minimum of 7 men's sports. Which sports stay? Basketball, baseball, football, soccer and hockey are the major sports in the US; they need to stay. That leaves two spots open: track and field and swimming and diving, which are the major Olympic sports not named above. Cross country is only partially an Olympic event (part of the pentathlon), golf won't be for much longer, and tennis something that you can go to local clubs for.

That wasn't the logic in the quoted article.

The logic was "UConn should cut those non-revenue sports which require round robin or semi round robin play that the Big XII plays so that they can be more attractive to the conference, as it means that the teams from Texas and Oklahoma will not have to travel ALL THE WAY to Connecticut every year for baseball and soccer".

It had nothing to do with UConns expenses. UConn will not need to cut any sports if it gets a P5 invite.
 

CTMike

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
11,416
Reaction Score
40,745
Chalk it up to more intangible value, but NBC mentioning UConn a million times has value... Does it not? Not saying it's a critical factor, but it's real value - no one else can reflect as well on a conference as we can. We aren't potential, we are actually out there getting mentioned.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
2,505
Reaction Score
9,607
Bob Huggins recruited the area very well. We regularly had 2-3 guys on the roster from Texas. Jason Maxiell (First round pick of the Pistons in 2005) was also from Texas. Interestingly for the 2017 class, we've started recruiting Texas again...and landed a commit from one kid and are in on a few more.

Yeah we like TX too - we had Jake Voskuhl - starting center on our 1999 NCAA Championship team and we also had some guy named Emeka Okafor - starting center on our 2004 NCAA Championship team. It's been fertile soil for us
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
88,979
Reaction Score
333,253
UH president Renu Khator met with UT booster Red McCombs to talk Big 12

UC to Big 12: Let's move forward
>>Interim President Beverly Davenport sent a letter to Big 12 Commissioner Bob Bowlsby on July 25 "to express our interest and excitement in moving forward to explore our candidacy for the Big 12 Conference," according to a document obtained by The Enquirer through a public records request.

UC and Big 12 officials on Monday declined comment about what the next step is in the process.

It's believed schools wanting to join the Big 12 were required to submit a letter of interest. Davenport's four-sentence letter was submitted to Bowlsby through the Big 12's Kansas City-based law firm. It asks attorney Kevin Sweeney to direct inquiries to Karen Kovach, UC's lead attorney.

The letter is a formality giving both parties the go-ahead to officially begin discussions. It is not an indication UC will receive an invitation to join one of the five major college football conferences.<<
 

Online statistics

Members online
317
Guests online
1,726
Total visitors
2,043

Forum statistics

Threads
157,661
Messages
4,117,833
Members
10,008
Latest member
macklin


Top Bottom