Dooley
Done with U-con athletics
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2012
- Messages
- 9,958
- Reaction Score
- 32,816
Not that I disagree with your point - CRA rule #1 has been to pick winning football or cable boxes and cable boxes have become a clouded metric. However, just saying the obvious: Houston (more friggen Texas?!), BYU (okay, I have nothing against this idea, I think its a winner, BYU has a national following), Cincy (I can't say anything bad about this idea either other than it is a city school, not a flagship state uni) and Memphis (Memphis does nothing for the long term need to get the B12 out of the sticks and in big cities).
Houston and Memphis because the B12 doesn't make any sense. If they could add SMU and North Texas without too much fanfare, they would.
Neither UH or Memphis has anything close to P5 data to support their candidacy as a viable long-term P5 option. But the B12 isn't thinking long-term. All of that Boren talk about academics, markets, network, long term growth, blah blah blah...none of it is applicable any longer. What is applicable: getting a football championship launched ASAP so they can make sure their top team won't be passed over by the Playoff committee. That's their thinking. An ASAP championship game means they will want two programs who have won a lot lately. That's why I think BYU and Houston.