- Joined
- Aug 29, 2015
- Messages
- 21,175
- Reaction Score
- 53,693
The recruiting really is getting very good. Makes me wonder if the smoke is starting to peak over the treeline
It makes me wonder if Connecticut boosters have finally realized that they have to invest in the program via NIL if they want to be competitive.The recruiting really is getting very good. Makes me wonder if the smoke is starting to peak over the treeline
To be fair NIL is new. I wonder what the NIL support would have looked like during RE1.0It makes me wonder if Connecticut boosters have finally realized that they have to invest in the program via NIL if they want to be competitive.
The recruiting really is getting very good. Makes me wonder if the smoke is starting to peak over the treeline
It makes me wonder if Connecticut boosters have finally realized that they have to invest in the program via NIL if they want to be competitive.
To be fair NIL is new. I wonder what the NIL support would have looked like during RE1.0
I bet it would have been pretty solid
Hard to say. Randy wasn't the most charismatic guy. I'm not sure how inclusive he would've been.To be fair NIL is new. I wonder what the NIL support would have looked like during RE1.0
I bet it would have been pretty solid
It was worse than that. We also got screwed conference wise in 2011 and 2012 and had to decamp to the dreadful AAC. We were in a BCS Bowl on 1/1/2011, in the midst of a 5 game win streak vs. Syracuse, and won our 3rd Natty in hoops on 4/4/2011. Then RE left and the conference crap started. To make matters worse, Warde Manuel (Susan Herbst's "rock star") was hired as AD after Hathaway was canned. It was a perfect storm.Hard to say. Randy wasn't the most charismatic guy. I'm not sure how inclusive he would've been.
Agreed though that RE1 was the golden era of Connecticut football. I remember people saying that it might take a decade before we would have a winning record and then everything seemed to come together perfectly. We seemed to be on an upward trend that would make us consistently a ranked program. Then we got the Pasqualone/Diaco doubleheader and all that momentum was wasted. We brought back Randy to stabilize the program and it turned out the game had passed him by.
Hopefully, Mora can pull us out of the hole and bring us back at least to respectability. I am cautiously optimistic given the influx of talent that we've seen, but I will remain skeptical until it translates to on the field success. We've been burned too many times.
Mora has made it clear that he perceives not being in a conference and not having an on campus stadium as two huge disadvantages at Connecticut at the Stamford roadshow. I'm not 100% sure on this, but I think he used the phrase "nearly insurmountable" regarding the double whammy of those two circumstances.It was worse than that. We also got screwed conference wise in 2011 and 2012 and had to decamp to the dreadful AAC. We were in a BCS Bowl on 1/1/2011, in the midst of a 5 game win streak vs. Syracuse, and won our 3rd Natty in hoops on 4/4/2011. Then RE left and the conference crap started. To make matters worse, Warde Manuel (Susan Herbst's "rock star") was hired as AD after Hathaway was canned. It was a perfect storm.
Through it all, we have adjusted and actually strengthened our hoops program, but football suffered. If football is going to make a return to competence, it will be because of a new conferences affiliation. Mora is doing as good as he can under the circumstances, but football needs a conference. If BB is taken over by the university participants ala CFP, that money will make us attractive to any conference. If so structured, March Madness will become the economic engine that will be our ticket to a real conference.
Hard to say. Randy wasn't the most charismatic guy. I'm not sure how inclusive he would've been.
Agreed though that RE1 was the golden era of Connecticut football. I remember people saying that it might take a decade before we would have a winning record and then everything seemed to come together perfectly. We seemed to be on an upward trend that would make us consistently a ranked program. Then we got the Pasqualone/Diaco doubleheader and all that momentum was wasted. We brought back Randy to stabilize the program and it turned out the game had passed him by.
Hopefully, Mora can pull us out of the hole and bring us back at least to respectability. I am cautiously optimistic given the influx of talent that we've seen, but I will remain skeptical until it translates to on the field success. We've been burned too many times.
Mora has made it clear that he perceives not being in a conference and not having an on campus stadium as two huge disadvantages at Connecticut at the Stamford roadshow. I'm not 100% sure on this, but I think he used the phrase "nearly insurmountable" regarding the double whammy of those two circumstances.
No… lack of NIL was a “catastrophic” thing (until he pitched a bitch after last year) - the lack of stadium/conference is just a “huge challenge”.Both things he was well aware of and never cried about when he took over and lead us to a surprisingly good first season
When he laid an egg in year two it became a catastrophic thing
As if being in the MAC or CUSA would solve all his problems lol
Both things he was well aware of and never cried about when he took over and lead us to a surprisingly good first season
When he laid an egg in year two it became a catastrophic thing
As if being in the MAC or CUSA would solve all his problems lol
No… lack of NIL was a “catastrophic” thing (until he pitched a bitch) - the lack of stadium/conference is a huge challenge.
I agree king. Bitching about the stadium is just excuse making. I lost a bit of respect for him when he went there.I guess it is a year to year thing to be challenged by it.
Didn't bother his first year players to play Indy and off campus.
Nor the recent highly ranked portal class. I would argue they likely wouldn't have come to face a skid of MAC or CUSA teams
I mean, he's not wrong.I agree king. Bitching about the stadium is just excuse making. I lost a bit of respect for him when he went there.
Yeah, he is. To make a thing out of something that's not going to change is a loser move. And did he bitch about not having an on-campus stadium at his last stop? I'm thinking no.I mean, he's not wrong.
I would suggest that an attitude of "the way things are are the way they will always be" is the "loser move."Yeah, he is. To make a thing out of something that's not going to change is a loser move. And did he bitch about not having an on-campus stadium at his last stop? I'm thinking no.
I thought about why the SEC would add FSU and from one perspective it seems redundant.You need to look closer at the math. FSU in the SEC would produce much higher ratings than they do playing most ACC opponents and be more valuable to ESPN. Here is an example from last year:
FSU/LSU: 9.17 million viewers
FSU/Florida: 5.07 million viewers
Syracuse/FSU: 2.09 million viewers
FSU/Wake Forest: 2.09 million viewers
Granted, there is a fixed revenue stream from monthly fees for ESPN, but there are also advertising rights which would be worth more than 2x in the SEC over the ACC. And, as sports move to streaming, brands will be more important and FSU is a top brand. I would think that FSU's overall media rights are probably worth almost 2x in the SEC over the ACC due to more compelling opponents.
And, for those of you who think the SEC would ever allow FSU to go to the Big 10, you are wrong. FSU+Florida would mean the SEC dominates Florida like they dominate Texas with Texas+Texas A&M.
He complained about a lot of the lack of support he received at UCLA so this isn’t making the point you think it isYeah, he is. To make a thing out of something that's not going to change is a loser move. And did he bitch about not having an on-campus stadium at his last stop? I'm thinking no.