Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell. | Page 852 | The Boneyard
.-.

Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell.

JMick said:
What's the fascination people have with Utah? And why do they have such a big ego? I really don't get it
Expand ...
I understand why people are fascinated with Utah to the Big10. They are AAU, have a good, Big10 like football program and, from 2010-2020, they were the fastest growing state by percentage. They just might be the most valuable program in the Big12. At least top 3 if not #1.

With all that being said, they don’t really excite me all that much. Would I go bat crap crazy if they join? Nope, but they don’t excite me at all.
 
nelsonmuntz said:
What new has happened? FSU and Clemson want to get out of the ACC. Good for them. The SEC does not want or need them, and the Big 10 is never going to offer full share memberships again, especially to two schools that do not have other options. Maybe they will get more than they did in the ACC, but at the cost of a schedule that their fans don't care about.
Expand ...

Gawd...to be so unconnected to football reality.

Do you think FSU fans relish playing Boston College, Syracuse, Wake Forest, Duke, Virginia, Pitt, Cal, Stanford, SMU..etc ?
 
Has the SEC or B1G even hinted at offering them landing spots? ESPN owns the media rights to the ACC and SEC. Don't they have to sign on to the idea that the SEC accepting Clemson and FSU into their conference means they have to pay those two 51M/year instead of 30M/year under the ACC? And is FOX willing to pay for those two to join the B1G now that the conference already just signed on 4 new schools at 60M a pop? I don't know the answers to those questions, I'm asking an open question. If they come in at partial shares to those conferences.. aren't they at best break even?
 
.-.
uconnbaseball said:
The odds of anonymous message board posters hearing legitimate information about conference realignment that concerns UConn in a positive light are the same as Halle Berry knocking on my door and begging me to sleep with her. Not that great.
Expand ...
You’re lucky. She can be a real pest.
 
Hamms30 said:
Has the SEC or B1G even hinted at offering them landing spots? ESPN owns the media rights to the ACC and SEC. Don't they have to sign on to the idea that the SEC accepting Clemson and FSU into their conference means they have to pay those two 51M/year instead of 30M/year under the ACC? And is FOX willing to pay for those two to join the B1G now that the conference already just signed on 4 new schools at 60M a pop? I don't know the answers to those questions, I'm asking an open question. If they come in at partial shares to those conferences.. aren't they at best break even?
Expand ...
You need to look closer at the math. FSU in the SEC would produce much higher ratings than they do playing most ACC opponents and be more valuable to ESPN. Here is an example from last year:

FSU/LSU: 9.17 million viewers
FSU/Florida: 5.07 million viewers

Syracuse/FSU: 2.09 million viewers
FSU/Wake Forest: 2.09 million viewers

Granted, there is a fixed revenue stream from monthly fees for ESPN, but there are also advertising rights which would be worth more than 2x in the SEC over the ACC. And, as sports move to streaming, brands will be more important and FSU is a top brand. I would think that FSU's overall media rights are probably worth almost 2x in the SEC over the ACC due to more compelling opponents.

And, for those of you who think the SEC would ever allow FSU to go to the Big 10, you are wrong. FSU+Florida would mean the SEC dominates Florida like they dominate Texas with Texas+Texas A&M.
 
UConnJim said:
And, for those of you who think the SEC would ever allow FSU to go to the Big 10, you are wrong. FSU+Florida would mean the SEC dominates Florida like they dominate Texas with Texas+Texas A&M.
Expand ...

I never realized the B1G and FSU needed the SEC's permission for the B1G to add FSU. Good to know.
 
dayooper said:
I understand why people are fascinated with Utah to the Big10. They are AAU, have a good, Big10 like football program and, from 2010-2020, they were the fastest growing state by percentage. They just might be the most valuable program in the Big12. At least top 3 if not #1.

With all that being said, they don’t really excite me all that much. Would I go bat crap crazy if they join? Nope, but they don’t excite me at all.
Expand ...

Your opinion isn’t shared. That’s for certain.
 
.-.
CL82 said:
It makes me wonder if Connecticut boosters have finally realized that they have to invest in the program via NIL if they want to be competitive.
Expand ...
To be fair NIL is new. I wonder what the NIL support would have looked like during RE1.0

I bet it would have been pretty solid
 
.-.
JMick said:
To be fair NIL is new. I wonder what the NIL support would have looked like during RE1.0

I bet it would have been pretty solid
Expand ...
Hard to say. Randy wasn't the most charismatic guy. I'm not sure how inclusive he would've been.

Agreed though that RE1 was the golden era of Connecticut football. I remember people saying that it might take a decade before we would have a winning record and then everything seemed to come together perfectly. We seemed to be on an upward trend that would make us consistently a ranked program. Then we got the Pasqualone/Diaco doubleheader and all that momentum was wasted. We brought back Randy to stabilize the program and it turned out the game had passed him by.

Hopefully, Mora can pull us out of the hole and bring us back at least to respectability. I am cautiously optimistic given the influx of talent that we've seen, but I will remain skeptical until it translates to on the field success. We've been burned too many times.
 
CL82 said:
Hard to say. Randy wasn't the most charismatic guy. I'm not sure how inclusive he would've been.

Agreed though that RE1 was the golden era of Connecticut football. I remember people saying that it might take a decade before we would have a winning record and then everything seemed to come together perfectly. We seemed to be on an upward trend that would make us consistently a ranked program. Then we got the Pasqualone/Diaco doubleheader and all that momentum was wasted. We brought back Randy to stabilize the program and it turned out the game had passed him by.

Hopefully, Mora can pull us out of the hole and bring us back at least to respectability. I am cautiously optimistic given the influx of talent that we've seen, but I will remain skeptical until it translates to on the field success. We've been burned too many times.
Expand ...
It was worse than that. We also got screwed conference wise in 2011 and 2012 and had to decamp to the dreadful AAC. We were in a BCS Bowl on 1/1/2011, in the midst of a 5 game win streak vs. Syracuse, and won our 3rd Natty in hoops on 4/4/2011. Then RE left and the conference crap started. To make matters worse, Warde Manuel (Susan Herbst's "rock star") was hired as AD after Hathaway was canned. It was a perfect storm.

Through it all, we have adjusted and actually strengthened our hoops program, but football suffered. If football is going to make a return to competence, it will be because of a new conferences affiliation. Mora is doing as good as he can under the circumstances, but football needs a conference. If BB is taken over by the university participants ala CFP, that money will make us attractive to any conference. If so structured, March Madness will become the economic engine that will be our ticket to a real conference.
 
Sea Goat said:
It was worse than that. We also got screwed conference wise in 2011 and 2012 and had to decamp to the dreadful AAC. We were in a BCS Bowl on 1/1/2011, in the midst of a 5 game win streak vs. Syracuse, and won our 3rd Natty in hoops on 4/4/2011. Then RE left and the conference crap started. To make matters worse, Warde Manuel (Susan Herbst's "rock star") was hired as AD after Hathaway was canned. It was a perfect storm.

Through it all, we have adjusted and actually strengthened our hoops program, but football suffered. If football is going to make a return to competence, it will be because of a new conferences affiliation. Mora is doing as good as he can under the circumstances, but football needs a conference. If BB is taken over by the university participants ala CFP, that money will make us attractive to any conference. If so structured, March Madness will become the economic engine that will be our ticket to a real conference.
Expand ...
Mora has made it clear that he perceives not being in a conference and not having an on campus stadium as two huge disadvantages at Connecticut at the Stamford roadshow. I'm not 100% sure on this, but I think he used the phrase "nearly insurmountable" regarding the double whammy of those two circumstances.
 
CL82 said:
Hard to say. Randy wasn't the most charismatic guy. I'm not sure how inclusive he would've been.

Agreed though that RE1 was the golden era of Connecticut football. I remember people saying that it might take a decade before we would have a winning record and then everything seemed to come together perfectly. We seemed to be on an upward trend that would make us consistently a ranked program. Then we got the Pasqualone/Diaco doubleheader and all that momentum was wasted. We brought back Randy to stabilize the program and it turned out the game had passed him by.

Hopefully, Mora can pull us out of the hole and bring us back at least to respectability. I am cautiously optimistic given the influx of talent that we've seen, but I will remain skeptical until it translates to on the field success. We've been burned too many times.
Expand ...

It’s not hard to say.

Randy would have been awful in the NIL era. Imagine Dabo Swinney only with no talent and no charisma.
 
.-.
You must log in or register to reply here.

Online statistics

Members online
361
Guests online
5,500
Total visitors
5,861
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,912
Messages
4,460,016
Members
10,331
Latest member
Sir Oolick


Top Bottom