Kadary Richmond Transferring | Page 5 | The Boneyard

Kadary Richmond Transferring

Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
13,237
Reaction Score
34,919
Gaffney cannot be the third best shooter on next years team. That'll be a disaster.
He shot 36% this year. He upped his percentage 10 points. He can absolutely improve that another few percentage points. This isn't like Martin where his numbers over 3 years have been roughly flat.

Cole shot 38% from 3.

Those two are the equivalent of the 2nd and 3rd best shooters from Creighton. (Ballock & Mitchell)

Hawkins is coming in with a rep for shooting.

You'd obviously like there to be someone—or two—players up in the 40% range, but you can be a very good team with your third best shooter shooting at Gaffney's percentage.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
22,337
Reaction Score
5,582
need hawkins in there for his shooting. it's not a popular opinion but aj hasnt proven he's going to start. the flashes he showed arent enough. kadary had a much better freshman year by any measurement.

Wait? You want us to judge players primarily by what we have seen of them on the court and only secondarily by how highly recruiting surveys thought of them when they were in high school? How outrageous!
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
22,337
Reaction Score
5,582
He shot 36% this year. He upped his percentage 10 points. He can absolutely improve that another few percentage points. This isn't like Martin where his numbers over 3 years have been roughly flat.

Cole shot 38% from 3.

Those two are the equivalent of the 2nd and 3rd best shooters from Creighton. (Ballock & Mitchell)

Hawkins is coming in with a rep for shooting.

You'd obviously like there to be someone—or two—players up in the 40% range, but you can be a very good team with your third best shooter shooting at Gaffney's percentage.

Good God, if you're going to spoil everyone's strong feelings with facts, why even be on the Boneyard?
 
Joined
May 3, 2019
Messages
26
Reaction Score
44
There are shooters. Cole, Gaffney, and Hawkins can all shoot. Akok and Samson might be decent enough from deep as bigs where bigs have to come out on them. Our inability to break teams down from the perimeter so we can get easier shots at the rim and from the perimeter is even more important than getting another shooter or two, though we still need 1 more shooter IMO.
Akok and Samson are questionable at best shooters right now. If Kadary starts then it's likely that only one of Cole/Gaffney/Hawkins starts and plays next to him.
 
Joined
Feb 7, 2012
Messages
5,669
Reaction Score
25,148
Akok and Samson are questionable at best shooters right now. If Kadary starts then it's likely that only one of Cole/Gaffney/Hawkins starts and plays next to him.
and thats a bad thing? Right now, Kadary is the best of that group.
 
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
13,773
Reaction Score
72,052
He shot 36% this year. He upped his percentage 10 points. He can absolutely improve that another few percentage points. This isn't like Martin where his numbers over 3 years have been roughly flat.

Cole shot 38% from 3.

Those two are the equivalent of the 2nd and 3rd best shooters from Creighton. (Ballock & Mitchell)

Hawkins is coming in with a rep for shooting.

You'd obviously like there to be someone—or two—players up in the 40% range, but you can be a very good team with your third best shooter shooting at Gaffney's percentage.

The only quibble I have with this post is the reference to Ballock. He slumped down the stretch this season but he's absolutely a better shooter than anyone on this team - he gets picked up across half court. Didn't he shoot something like 45% as a junior?
 
Joined
Mar 3, 2015
Messages
887
Reaction Score
4,794
The only quibble I have with this post is the reference to Ballock. He slumped down the stretch this season but he's absolutely a better shooter than anyone on this team - he gets picked up across half court. Didn't he shoot something like 45% as a junior?

^^^^^

Mitch Ballock is maybe the best shooter in the country. The 3's he takes are from 25 feet or else sprinting full speed off a screen. Very different than the 3's our guys are attempting.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
16,227
Reaction Score
35,665
Idk that he has too. Brooklyn kid(Bouk/Kimani). Major target from us out of highschool, he wanted to come here, and we clearly have a bunch of minutes for him here. I see a bunch of different variations of a 3 guard line up next year and he can play the 1-3. Remember Brendan Adams played loads of minutes earlier in the year. With him and Bouk gone Kadary can slide right in as a major contributor from day 1
We also have two good freshmen coming in at the 1-3. Add Cole and Gaffney, plus Jackson at his natural position at the 3, and maybe even Martin getting some time there, and there are not a ton of minutes to go around.

That's not to say we shouldn't take him, but if his sticking point was guaranteeing him a starting spot and major minutes, that's going to be a tough sell.
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2011
Messages
12,487
Reaction Score
66,559
We also have two good freshmen coming in at the 1-3. Add Cole and Gaffney, plus Jackson at his natural position at the 3, and maybe even Martin getting some time there, and there are not a ton of minutes to go around.

That's not to say we shouldn't take him, but if his sticking point was guaranteeing him a starting spot and major minutes, that's going to be a tough sell.
We're losing 2 players at the 2 and have 1 incoming freshman 2. We're a bit saturated at the 1, so I hope Kadary doesn't want to play point somewhere. He basically played point at Cuse.. We might be out of luck if that's the case. But he's probably most naturally a playmaking 2 at this level, and that would be an excellent addition to the roster and he would get starting minutes there for us. Cole is quite good spotting up off the ball, so it's a pretty good fit, to be hoenst.
 
Joined
May 3, 2019
Messages
26
Reaction Score
44
and thats a bad thing? Right now, Kadary is the best of that group.
Just saying the shooting would be pretty terrible and we'd run into the same problems where players get doubled on every drive and there isn't enough shooting to punish it.
 
Joined
Dec 14, 2015
Messages
8,380
Reaction Score
56,077
Just saying the shooting would be pretty terrible and we'd run into the same problems where players get doubled on every drive and there isn't enough shooting to punish it.
But no one is saying add Kadary and nothing else. We'll add shooting outside of Kadary
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
10,709
Reaction Score
12,090
Epic meltdown, the thread started at 11:30, has over 850 posts and 35 pages deep.

imageforaddingstickerandtext.jpg
 
Last edited:

Huskyforlife

Akokbouk
Joined
Feb 19, 2013
Messages
12,167
Reaction Score
49,376
He shot 36% this year. He upped his percentage 10 points. He can absolutely improve that another few percentage points. This isn't like Martin where his numbers over 3 years have been roughly flat.

Cole shot 38% from 3.

Those two are the equivalent of the 2nd and 3rd best shooters from Creighton. (Ballock & Mitchell)

Hawkins is coming in with a rep for shooting.

You'd obviously like there to be someone—or two—players up in the 40% range, but you can be a very good team with your third best shooter shooting at Gaffney's percentage.
Even if we assume Gaffney improves as a shooter, you'd also have to assume he gets enough minutes for it to matter. With Cole, Richmond, Jackson, Hawkins ahead of him, and even Diggins stealing some time, how much impact can Gaffney make? We need a shooter who stays on the floor consistently.
 
Joined
Jan 19, 2017
Messages
2,622
Reaction Score
19,244
He shot 36% this year. He upped his percentage 10 points. He can absolutely improve that another few percentage points. This isn't like Martin where his numbers over 3 years have been roughly flat.

Cole shot 38% from 3.

Those two are the equivalent of the 2nd and 3rd best shooters from Creighton. (Ballock & Mitchell)

Hawkins is coming in with a rep for shooting.

You'd obviously like there to be someone—or two—players up in the 40% range, but you can be a very good team with your third best shooter shooting at Gaffney's percentage.

Also, if Whaley comes back, one of the things he'll be working hard on over the summer is 3pt shooting. I saw enough this year to predict that he'll shoot 34%+ on ~2x more volume.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
13,237
Reaction Score
34,919
Even if we assume Gaffney improves as a shooter, you'd also have to assume he gets enough minutes for it to matter. With Cole, Richmond, Jackson, Hawkins ahead of him, and even Diggins stealing some time, how much impact can Gaffney make? We need a shooter who stays on the floor consistently.
He can certainly be on the court a great deal as he can play 3 positions. And no one we're bringing in is as good as Bouk. I see no reason why his minutes would decline.
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
57,184
Reaction Score
209,921
Karary got 21 minutes a game as a Freshman. That is a decent amount of minutes, but losing most of his minutes to Joe Girard is not a good coaching decision. Richmond was certainly the most talented and versatile PG on that team. The question is whether he can come to UConn and get more playing time? He certainly fills a need as a good ball handler at 6'5", but isn't that what Jackson is supposed to be?
Jackson really isn’t a point guard. He’s got a good handle and he is a good passer though.
 

gtcam

Diehard since '65
Joined
Sep 12, 2012
Messages
11,009
Reaction Score
29,076
He can certainly be on the court a great deal as he can play 3 positions. And no one we're bringing in is as good as Bouk. I see no reason why his minutes would decline.
we will see but I wouldn't be so confident in that statement
 

Online statistics

Members online
350
Guests online
2,470
Total visitors
2,820

Forum statistics

Threads
157,271
Messages
4,090,647
Members
9,983
Latest member
Darkbloom


Top Bottom