- Joined
- Oct 14, 2015
- Messages
- 2,813
- Reaction Score
- 7,100
No!
![]()
Don't think so.Yes.
Don't think so.
The article has been updated by the author. Don't think there is a mistake.Or he simply made a mistake in omitting UCLA.
13.11.2 Comments Before Signing. Before the signing of a prospect to a National Letter of Intent or an institution's written offer of admission and/or financial aid, a member institution may comment publicly only to the extent of confirming its recruitment of the prospect. The institution may not comment generally about the prospect's ability or the contribution that the prospect might make to the institution's team; further, the institution is precluded from commenting in any manner as to the likelihood of the prospect's signing with that institution. Violations of this bylaw do not affect a prospect's eligibility and are considered institutional violations per Constitution 2.8.1. (Revised: 1/14/97)
Love when you answer your own questions. It is a good theory. Carry on!Whats the difference between saying we are not aware she made a decision or we are aware she has made a decision? Nothing. They can't say what that decision is, but they can say whether they have been informed or not.
I am very versed in this rule, please tell me how it applies at all to what I said.
Boy Charlie, you sure know how to put a damper on a feel good party.![]()

Or he simply made a mistake in omitting UCLA.
"... a member institution may comment publicly only to the extent of confirming it's recruitment of the prospect." It is very well known that UConn IS recruiting Ezi... so there is no question there...13.11.2 Comments Before Signing. Before the signing of a prospect to a National Letter of Intent or an institution's written offer of admission and/or financial aid, a member institution may comment publicly only to the extent of confirming its recruitment of the prospect. The institution may not comment generally about the prospect's ability or the contribution that the prospect might make to the institution's team; further, the institution is precluded from commenting in any manner as to the likelihood of the prospect's signing with that institution. Violations of this bylaw do not affect a prospect's eligibility and are considered institutional violations per Constitution 2.8.1. (Revised: 1/14/97)
Well, that’s one way to make an announcement.don’t announce it yourself.... does that top Stewie’s hood of a car LOI?
I still wanna know if they stopped the for her to sign, how was there a picture??
So, it seemed like April 11, 2018 will be the day that we will know if the teenage super star is coming or not. March Madness will be over by then.
I sent an e-mail to the reporter maybe 3 hours ago asking for the source of his information. I imagine he is inundated and won't answer a mere citizen.

From a Canberra perspective, the big news is who they signed. Secondary to that is who they lose. Tertiary (or lower) is where the departing player is going.If Mr. Caden Helmers had this great scoop, why did he bury it in a parenthetical?
Did Ezi and her family authorize him to let the cat out of the bag, and if so, why? Are they ok with this very peculiar process? Even though they haven't said anything yet, might they say something in the next day or so?
Is he kind of sloppy and forgot about UCLA or just assumed she would pick UConn?
Very excited about the possibility of an Ezi commitment, but scratching my head......![]()
That's a rather UCONN centric view of the world and scoop. This reporter could care less if Ezi goes to UCONN, all the reporter cares about is his team finding a replacement for Ezi.If Mr. Caden Helmers had this great scoop, why did he bury it in a parenthetical?
Did Ezi and her family authorize him to let the cat out of the bag, and if so, why? Are they ok with this very peculiar process? Even though they haven't said anything yet, might they say something in the next day or so?
Is he kind of sloppy and forgot about UCLA or just assumed she would pick UConn?
Very excited about the possibility of an Ezi commitment, but scratching my head......![]()
That's a rather UCONN centric view of the world and scoop. This reporter could care less if Ezi goes to UCONN, all the reporter cares about is his team finding a replacement for Ezi.

With the sort of exception of volleyball (and in some ways in football) height isn't such a big deal in any sport I can think of except for basketball.
There is nothing wrong with UCONN WCBB being the center of "our" world.So if he could care less, maybe we shouldn't expect too much precision in that "disclosure"?
And UConn is the center of the world, for the next few weeks at least!![]()
The only precision I found in the article was that Ezi is leaving her Australian team. That Ezi is leaving her Australian team for the center of the world of WCBB ( UCONN) is sweet speculation.