- Joined
- Dec 1, 2011
- Messages
- 1,101
- Reaction Score
- 4,328
I think value also includes an opportunity cost. In this case, UConn might have a higher value on the open market. But with Fox, the value is $4M.OK. Let's try it this way: more value than us. And remember, value equals what someone is willing to pay for you. Not how many wins your athletic department has. The market has repeatedly said we don't have as much value as we think we have.
Where are you getting the value of basketball skyrocketing? Because Yormark said he thinks basketball is undervalued? We are clinging to that quote. Newsflash, he was playing us for the teams he really wanted. Notice how he never actually quantified how much it was worth? He is such a good salesman. He got everyone drooling and played to our confirmation bias.
Look, I am a huge UConn fan - football and basketball season ticket holder. I have not given up hope. And I do believe there is way more change coming and my gut is we will land on our feet somewhere somehow. But this is where we are today.
That’s part of the price we paid in moving back to BE. Being property of Fox and asking them to pay $25M more for same product plus football doesn’t work.
Not exactly sure why ESPN and ACC won’t act but I think that’s FOX’s position
It has nothing to do with Kansas' titles. Did you read the commentary about UConn being added to the Big XII? Yes they said our football was trash, but they also pointed to the 2016-2021 years in hoops and other bad stretches under JC. It's ridiculous, but it's a perception that is out there. We do tend to over-estimate the value of NCs vs consistency because we've won so many. Those who didn't win any definitely under-estimate titles, because they are hard to get. Very few schools have more than one.