I believe that Towson is better then UConn.
The rest is just Sagarin's computer algorithims...which is all that we can gave when you don't play head to head.
LSU almost lost to Arkansas (who lost to Rutgers) this weekend. Good teams sometimes struggle with bad teams.
In watched UCF dominate Penn state and lose in the last seconds to South Carolina.
That Penn State team beat Wisconsin thoroughly at home while Clemson got trampled by South Carolina.
You're trolling now.
I believe that Towson is better then UConn.
The rest is just Sagarin's computer algorithims...which is all that we can gave when you don't play head to head.
That's why going undefeated is fairly tough. And the best teams don't stumble.
I'm not giving Bama a bye on this, their kicking game was horrible and they wouldn't have been in their situation had they a kicker like FSU's....
Too smug by double.
Alabama wouldn't even need a kicker in the ACC.
Yeah those are two data points. UCF also held on for dear life against bad teams.
I think they are the best team in the American but are probably 13th-17th overall.
I'll name some teams tell me which they are better than:
FSU
Ohio State
Alabama
Auburn
Missouri
Oklahoma State
Baylor
Stanford
Oregon
Michigan State
Arizona State
Wisconsin
South Carolina
Texas A&M
Maybe not...but FSU's kicker has missed one kick all year. And Bama would have won with him..IMHO
Too smug by double.
Alabama wouldn't even need a kicker in the ACC.
upstater said:Right, but he wrote that UCF could draw N Illinois, which is a game they might win, implying they'd have a tough time beating Wisconsin or Michigan St. or Oregon or Oklahoma St. or South Carolina.
Aguayo at FSU is 18 of 19 for field goals...I just think that Bama would be clearly in the NC race had they had a kicker.
I wrote that. And I think UCF would beat Northern Illinois and lose to Wisconsin, Michigan State, Oregon and Oklahoma State. They already lost to South Carolina at home.
Do you think UCF is better than Wisconsin, Michigan State, Oregon or Oklahoma State?
upstater said:The key word he used was "Might." Do I think UCF has a decent chance to beat those teams? Yes. 45/55. I've seen the B1G teams in particular play quite a bit. I never saw PSU so thoroughly dominated this year as against UCF and Ohio St. Otherwise, PSU went toe-to-toe with competition.
You have UCF as 45/55 to beat those schools. Well you should get rich with that advantage as the rest of the world has them in any matchup at 20/80.
I wrote last week that Clemson wasn't for real. They never are. Now someone needs to explain why UCF is behind Clemson when UCF's only loss was a very close game to the team that just dominated Clemson.
It's a long stretch for you to call South Carolina's win over Clemson a domination. I watched the whole thing. The Game was tied in the fourth quarter. Clemson had 6 turnovers and only lost by 14. Calling it a self destruction would be more accurate than any domination. Or better yet a flop by Tahj Boyd. He caused most of the turnovers himself.
On the other hand Florida State dominated Clemson. Those were Clemson's only losses. Clemson could do very well in their bowl game.
upstater said:That's because they are underrating UCF. UCF is much better than people think. Teams like Wisconsin, on the other hand, are incredibly overrated. Wisconsin hasn't beaten a decent team all year, despite their record. In a bowl game like that, I ook at the QBs, and the difference between those two QBs is huge. Wisky's guy can't hit the broadside of a barn, whereas Bortles is looking at a pro career.
I don't believe in Clemson. I have said that for a while. Clemson is better known for giving up 70 points in bowls than they are in winning them.