Carl, I've answered you multiple times. Multiple times. I don't know why you don't read it. Can't help you. I'm on page 44 right now, I see my repeated post about punishment on #393, #398,and multiple ones from earlier today.
The bizarre thing is that in posts #370 and #330, you responded to what I stated the punishment should be, and either you are really losing it, or you are deliberately playing games.
I disagree with you. What more needs to be said? Frankly, I've stated my position on this thread and stuck to it.
You, meanwhile, are all over the place. From death penalty, to 1 year off. I can't figure out what you even stand for anymore.
Suffice it to say we disagree on death penalty and also the nature of the cover-up. I agree with the Freeh report, and have been stating so for quite awhile now.
I don't even know what else is in dispute.
Let me make this clear once and for all:
1. I agree punishment is warranted
2. Don't agree on death penalty
3. Agree on cover-up
4. Don't agree on motives, but I'm open to it and think it's arguable/up in the air.
Otherwise, I really have absolutely no idea what you're going on about.
upstater, Today at 3:28 PMReport
#393
Stated it repeatedly in this thread. Stated it at the start, stated it a few weeks ago with the emails, stated it again and again.
I don't think any of it is appropriate or logical because what happened so outweighs concerns with extracurricular sports. But that being said, I think shutting down football for one year can be done out of moral opprobrium. As for propriety, that's a different story. Like I said, I don't really care. I tend to think this is a problem of PSU's administrative culture. The top guys like Spanier and Schultz were in CYA mode because of concern with potential liabilities. Whereas Paterno was more concerned with Sandusky's well-being. How do you ameliorate that except by firing all concerned, cleaning house, then re-writing rules? (To make sure it never happens again? No, that's not possible. But to try harder at making it not happen again). What to do with the football program is so secondary and frankly not important.
upstater, Today at 3:37 PMReport
#398
You simply don't believe that Joe Paterno did not want his football program tarnished in any way, and that is the single reason that Jerry Sandusky was still abusing boys in the shower room in teh same building where Joe Paterno's offices were for years.
You will use every bit of your ability to find nooks and crannies in information, in peoples actions, to get around that and find ways to make it comfortable for you, that it wasn't the case. You'll say, and you have, that Joe Paterno's image is forever tarnished now. Administration, rules....blah blah blah.
The fact is that all of the crimes Sandusky has been convicted of, occurred AFTER Paterno knew about this man's behavior. What's most disturbing to me right now, is finding out today that Paterno - never talked to Sandusky directly about it in 1998.
I'm done w/ you upstater. You disappoint me, and you are representative of Penn State. Trust me on this, or don't, whatever....if Penn State was doing the right things, simply saying the right things, and backing them up with actions, now, there would be no need for the punishment they will surely get and no need to penalize the football program severely. And that school is going to get punished.
Over and out for today.
(Don't place bets Jimmy. It's for real. )