- Joined
- Jan 13, 2014
- Messages
- 9,877
- Reaction Score
- 29,420
I agree with you - in theory. Yogi Berra said, "In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is."There should be no difference in the way the NCAA looks at Westbrook’s waiver request, regardless of which school she ends up at. I know, we’re UConn and we’re used to being screwed by the NCAA.
The only exception would be a medical hardship waiver that would allow Westbrook to have immediate eligibility if she transfers to a school within 100 miles from her home. But for that waiver to be granted, Westbrook would need to document that a family member had a serious health problem, and that’s not the case as far as I know.
"Should" is the operative word here. In practice you can apparently make up any BS you want, regardless of what you have been quoted in writing in the past, and the NCAA will consider it based on what side of bed they got up on or Mark Emmert's personal vendettas. IMO the "Close to home" factor helps Oregon's case - in practice - and the "No way Tennessee would sign off" factor hurts UConn - in practice. And even if this isn't true, it could at least help Kelly Graves make the case that it might be.

