ND<NIU<Buffalo < UConn=UConn number ! indy programThis is absolutely true and probably the thing that is keeping UConn out of the Big 12...
...But ESPN has some essentially wholly owned conferences. If ESPN likes UConn enough - and UConn football is good enough to curtail griping from certain members of these conferences - ESPN may pull the trigger on UConn.
Taking away the bargain Fox is currently getting on UConn also doesn't hurt the equation for ESPN. Fox should of course realize this, and with game theory and such start to weigh the option of losing UConn altogether.
Fox currently owns UConn's most valuable part (basketball). The question is whether ESPN would be willing to pay for the whole package, and if Fox is willing to let that happen and potentially lose UConn altogether. Football improvement dramatically helps that whole package equation.
Andddd????Flug has been called a lot of interesting things here, but the moment he says something positive about us and we are all in.
If you're so confident that UConn would be such a big loser for Fox, at least offer what you think the financial delta would look like. And to think we morans wasted so much time on the Big 12 rumblings.So fox loses money or that you know more than fox does. Gotcha.
Here is Flugaur's video. He talks about UConn at the beginning. He says that it isn't going to happen this year. At 59:06 he continues. He says there is a belief at the top of the Big 12 leadership that they are leaving money on the table by not adding UConn. He says that the change in the CFB being discussed takes away the negatives of adding UConn for football. That is causing a change in the Big 12 schools perception of adding UConn. He says that at the beginning of next year there will be a new revenue stream for the Big 12 and UConn will be a plus. He says there will be national reporting before the end of the year on UConn and Big 12 talks continuing.
This is absolutely true and probably the thing that is keeping UConn out of the Big 12...
...But ESPN has some essentially wholly owned conferences. If ESPN likes UConn enough - and UConn football is good enough to curtail griping from certain members of these conferences - ESPN may pull the trigger on UConn.
Taking away the bargain Fox is currently getting on UConn also doesn't hurt the equation for ESPN. Fox should of course realize this, and with game theory and such start to weigh the option of losing UConn altogether.
Fox currently owns UConn's most valuable part (basketball). The question is whether ESPN would be willing to pay for the whole package, and if Fox is willing to let that happen and potentially lose UConn altogether. Football improvement dramatically helps that whole package equation.
Big 12, PAC 2 and who else? I didn't hear about a third conference.We’ve been contacted by at least three conferences in the last 60 days. No matter how you look at it, things are looking up. Football looking good is only going to help.
Holy crap that is painful to watch. I had to turn it off after he stuttered his way through a Texas school flipping. I couldn't handle listening anymore. Good golly he needs to work on speaking fluently if he's going to do a video.
The ACC evaluating backfill options. I heard that the ACC was sniffing around early in the summer. They want to know who will come in at a discount. SMU joining for no money created a mess for us. I don’t believe UConn is interested in a no money deal.what's the third?
Imagine a ACC/B12/Pac UConn bidding warThe ACC evaluating backfill options. I heard that the ACC was sniffing around early in the summer. They want to know who will come in at a discount. SMU joining for no money created a mess for us. I don’t believe UConn is interested in a no money deal.
Now it seems the ACC won’t need to backfill yet because FSU and Clemson appear to be staying. There may have been or continues to be talk of adding schools to increase the contract amount and then giving some of the extra money to the big name schools.
Imagine a ACC/B12/Pac UConn bidding war
Here is Flugaur's video. He talks about UConn at the beginning. He says that it isn't going to happen this year. At 59:06 he continues. He says there is a belief at the top of the Big 12 leadership that they are leaving money on the table by not adding UConn. He says that the change in the CFB being discussed takes away the negatives of adding UConn for football. That is causing a change in the Big 12 schools perception of adding UConn. He says that at the beginning of next year there will be a new revenue stream for the Big 12 and UConn will be a plus. He says there will be national reporting before the end of the year on UConn and Big 12 talks continuing.
This. I doubt the big brands want to share all the money with schools like Vandy, RU, Miss St etc. They will find a way to keep even more money for themselves. It is just a matter of the time for them to think of a new way to maximize revenue and not share with lesser schools that are in-conference now. It is either this or they will come up with a scheme to do unequal revenue sharing like the ACC is planning.I’m not sure there would be a bidding war so much as UConn just trying to get a fair deal that will fund growth. Whatever happens in the next few years isn’t the end game anyway.
I suspect there is a hint of truth and a lot of embellishment.After listening to Flugar again, I still think he's FOS and just regurgitating what has already trickled out: no vote in the short term (not no, not yes) and maybe something decided next year. Wow, so 1 Texas school is leaning towards a yes, that's fantastic, that gets us 7 probably positives out of 12 needed, !!! For him to go on to say that there are things trending favorably towards UConn only to counter with there are other scenarios that don't include UConn...all meaningless ramblings unless there is an overwhelming majority that say add UConn now. The Big12 prezs have known (or should have known) that UConn has value, they knew last year and early this year, that has not changed, and if they didn't know, then they have no business being in charge of major universities while having such myopic views. "I can only go so far with this...other things have to happen", yeah, sure bub, keep downing those milkshakes. It's a nothing story! Other universities don't get this crap as they get offered and added within days without this long drawn out nonsense.
That said, Benedict did say over the weekend something along the lines "...we love being part of the Big East...", okay, so something may be brewing, maybe not with the Big12.
Looking at all factors, it would be beyond stupid not adding UConn to the B12 just due to our brand name alone. If the media money can be worked out, we should get the votes but you never know with these presidents. After all, you still got some of the presidents in the B12 now that screwed up the PAC-12 with their outdated thinking.I suspect there is a hint of truth and a lot of embellishment.
There probably has been movement in our favor.
I also suspect that there will be a vote as soon as the votes are there, whenever that is.
You seem have some anger about this issue.After listening to Flugar again, I still think he's FOS and just regurgitating what has already trickled out: no vote in the short term (not no, not yes) and maybe something decided next year. Wow, so 1 Texas school is leaning towards a yes, that's fantastic, that gets us 7 probably positives out of 12 needed, !!! For him to go on to say that there are things trending favorably towards UConn only to counter with there are other scenarios that don't include UConn...all meaningless ramblings unless there is an overwhelming majority that say add UConn now. The Big12 prezs have known (or should have known) that UConn has value, they knew last year and early this year, that has not changed, and if they didn't know, then they have no business being in charge of major universities while having such myopic views. "I can only go so far with this...other things have to happen", yeah, sure bub, keep downing those milkshakes. It's a nothing story! Other universities don't get this crap as they get offered and added within days without this long drawn out nonsense.
That said, Benedict did say over the weekend something along the lines "...we love being part of the Big East...", okay, so something may be brewing, maybe not with the Big12.
I mean the SEC and Big Ten are basically trying to take the CFP for themselves. Adding more brands shouldn’t hurt them. But short sighted presidents.I imagine the the Big 12 is thinking they are doing fine without UConn but maybe they can do a little better with.
After listening to Flugar again, I still think he's FOS and just regurgitating what has already trickled out: no vote in the short term (not no, not yes) and maybe something decided next year. Wow, so 1 Texas school is leaning towards a yes, that's fantastic, that gets us 7 probably positives out of 12 needed, !!! For him to go on to say that there are things trending favorably towards UConn only to counter with there are other scenarios that don't include UConn...all meaningless ramblings unless there is an overwhelming majority that say add UConn now. The Big12 prezs have known (or should have known) that UConn has value, they knew last year and early this year, that has not changed, and if they didn't know, then they have no business being in charge of major universities while having such myopic views. "I can only go so far with this...other things have to happen", yeah, sure bub, keep downing those milkshakes. It's a nothing story! Other universities don't get this crap as they get offered and added within days without this long drawn out nonsense.
That said, Benedict did say over the weekend something along the lines "...we love being part of the Big East...", okay, so something may be brewing, maybe not with the Big12.
Eh, I'm southern Italian, I have a short fuse, ^_^.You seem have some anger about this issue.