Transfer portal part 2 | Page 18 | The Boneyard

Transfer portal part 2

There seems to be a lot of confusion about how the 2020-2021 "COVID season" impacted eligibility. The rule was never "everyone gets an extra year" which is what, for example, Banghart (on behalf of Ivy Leaguers) and Notre Dame fans (on behalf of Dodson) have been claiming. Rather, it was that the COVID season would not count against anyone's eligibility whether you played that season or not. Lots of media sources have also been using the "extra year" language because it's quicker and easier to understand than getting into the technicalities of eligibility clocks, etc. But it's not exactly accurate, which has created perceived unfairnesses.

Now, it's perfectly fine to argue about whether the NCAA policy is sensible or not, which is a separate question. But at the very least, the NCAA has applied their rule consistently.

As for Abby Meyers, this decision doesn't change the fact that she still has a year of eligibility. She has only played 2017-2018, 2019-2020, and 2021-2022.

As for Littlefield -- sorry but she wasn't getting drafted.
 
Last edited:
Not sure where to put this.. So ill put it here.


I don't appreciate her inference, capitalizing STUDENT, that non ivy players aren't students as well or to some lesser degree. I didn't think the Ivy league schools had athletic scholarships...so they were paying regardless of this decision.
 
I disagree, it's one thing if those players elected to not play themselves, but when the conference made the decision for them, I believe they should get the exception.
Agreed. And the teams that played a few games, then called it quits, they get the extra year.
I’m not sure why this issue has caused so much confusion. College athletes get 4 years of eligibility. Last year didn’t count towards those 4 years. Whether an athlete played last season (Dorka at tOSU), decided not to play (Maya Dodson at Stanford) or had the decision made for them by their school/conference (Abby Meyers at Princeton), an athlete still only gets 4 years of eligibility, not including last season, which doesn’t count for anyone.

The only unfairness I perceive in this process involves HS recruits from the classes of 2021-2024 who may lose PT sitting behind 5th year players.
 
.-.
I’m not sure why this issue has caused so much confusion. College athletes get 4 years of eligibility. Last year didn’t count towards those 4 years. Whether an athlete played last season (Dorka at tOSU), decided not to play (Maya Dodson at Stanford) or had the decision made for them by their school/conference (Abby Meyers at Princeton), an athlete still only gets 4 years of eligibility, not including last season, which doesn’t count for anyone.

The only unfairness I perceive in this process involves HS recruits from the classes of 2021-2024 who may lose PT sitting behind 5th year players.
Im still confused even after your explanation. So those super seniors last year were playing in their 5th year and effectively had 5 years of eligibility. Were the super seniors a one time thing for 2021-2022 or will the super seniors be around for 3 more years? I agree it is the HS recruits over the next few years who are being most negatively impacted by the extra COVID year being granted.
 
Im still confused even after your explanation. So those super seniors last year were playing in their 5th year and effectively had 5 years of eligibility. Were the super seniors a one time thing for 2021-2022 or will the super seniors be around for 3 more years? I agree it is the HS recruits over the next few years who are being most negatively impacted by the extra COVID year being granted.
Super seniors will be around for 3 more years.
 
Im still confused even after your explanation. So those super seniors last year were playing in their 5th year and effectively had 5 years of eligibility. Were the super seniors a one time thing for 2021-2022 or will the super seniors be around for 3 more years? I agree it is the HS recruits over the next few years who are being most negatively impacted by the extra COVID year being granted.
OK, let me go over it again:
  • Last season is basically a “do-over” for every college athlete (Covid year). It’s as if it never happened…kind of like the Avengers when the Hulk gets the infinity stones and brings back the other half of everybody in the universe that were eliminated by Thanos when he had the infinity stones.
  • Because last year didn’t count for any college athlete, every athlete in college last year still gets to compete for 4 full seasons.
  • So last year’s seniors got to compete this year if they wanted to. This year’s seniors get to compete next year if they want to. Next year’s seniors get to compete in 2023-24 if they want to. 2023-24 seniors get to compete in 2024-25 if they want to.
  • While all of last year’s athletes get a 5th year of competition, just because they were in college last year, the athletes that get the “short end of the stick” are the HS recruits from 2021-24, who only get 4 years to complete their 4 years of eligibility, which may mean they ride the bench behind 5th year players.
  • After 2024-25, things return to relative normalcy. Everyone has 4 years to complete their eligibility unless they are redshirted due to injury or some other reason. Nobody gets to play 5 years.
 
I’m not sure why this issue has caused so much confusion. College athletes get 4 years of eligibility. Last year didn’t count towards those 4 years. Whether an athlete played last season (Dorka at tOSU), decided not to play (Maya Dodson at Stanford) or had the decision made for them by their school/conference (Abby Meyers at Princeton), an athlete still only gets 4 years of eligibility, not including last season, which doesn’t count for anyone.

The only unfairness I perceive in this process involves HS recruits from the classes of 2021-2024 who may lose PT sitting behind 5th year players.
i definitely agree with you when it comes to high school students for the next few years. But I still feel the same as it pertains the Ivy League athletes, I understand the situation and I understand the NCAA reasoning, but where I differ with you is where the students get screwed by the decisions of their conference.

While in the eyes of the NCAA everyone that's taking an extra year is only playing 4 years it still doesn't change the reality that everyone else will get an option of a whole extra season to play their given sport. That's why I believe those kids deserve an exception, it seems unfair to me that two students that entered college at the same time can get a whole extra season of play based on the luck of what conference you're in.
.
 
I don't understand why people can't understand this - and I am deeply displeased that Banghart can't wrap her head around this simple concept.
I disagree, it's one thing if those players elected to not play themselves, but when the conference made the decision for them, I believe they should get the exception.
There is something very subtle to what Courtney is upset about. There was a lot of uncertainty when the NCAA decided on the extra year of eligibility. One of the provisions of that NCAA announcement is that schools COULD NOT withdraw athletic scholarship for players who decided to opt out because of COVID.
Since the Ivy League does not offer athletic scholarship that provision was never going to the apply to the Ivy League players. I just think her ire is misdirect. She should be directing her ire at the Ivy league which could have simply changed the policy.
 
Last edited:
.-.
Saniya Rivers has entered the portal
Season 9 What GIF by The Office
 
Saniya Rivers has entered the portal
I remember hearing her on media day with dreams of being freshman of the year. She did get some minutes in the tournament but I get it.
 
Saniya Rivers has entered the portal
Not all that surprising. I noticed her body language at times was less than enthusiastic in moments when her teammates were jovial. I’m sure playing time was a big factor. It’s unfortunate but this moves up Talaysia Cooper‘s role at SC and she has all the abilities that Saniya has, and gives more time at the point for Kierra Fletcher. Also, likely increases Breezy Hall’s role as she was the breakout player of the three healthy players of the ‘21 class. Wish Saniya all the best wherever she goes.

SC now with 2 open scholarships for next season.
 
Last edited:
.-.
She is also listed as “do not contact” so she seems sure of where she wants to go.
 
Go get her UConn!!
Come on Mdoggie. Don't you remember she was adamant about not wanting to play for UConn when she was in high school? It would surprise me if she has changed her mind.
 
.-.
Come on Mdoggie. Don't you remember she was adamant about not wanting to play for UConn when she was in high school? It would surprise me if she has changed her mind.
Which these recruits do often nowadays. Mind changing.
 
Not all that surprising. I noticed her body language at times was less than enthusiastic in moments when her teammates were jovial. I’m sure playing time was a big factor. It’s unfortunate but this moves up Talaysia Cooper‘s role at SC and she has all the abilities that Saniya had, and gives more time at the point for Kierra Fletcher. Also, likely increases Breezy Hall’s role as she was the breakout player of the three healthy players of the ‘21 class. Wish Saniya all the best wherever she goes.

SC now with 2 open scholarships for next season.
I wonder if her 3 game tournament suspension by Dawn had anything to do with her decision?
 
Saniya Rivers has entered the portal
I said this in the game chat room during the tournament. I thought I had read it somewhere prior to then, but maybe I was just seeing into the future?
 
She is also listed as “do not contact” so she seems sure of where she wants to go.
Anyone know how this works? Does the player then reach out to the teams in which she is interested?
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,388
Messages
4,570,093
Members
10,475
Latest member
Tunwin22


Top Bottom