How is it a substantial collection of talent?
Looks like we hear different nuances in the word substantial. The core of Horston and Key is for real. Jackson is an excellent addition, at least on paper. Dye is a genuine talent and a leading personality.
And I agree that their talent pool doesn’t quite compare to that of the current top 3. These teams are stellar. Tennessee is merely substantial. They probably belong somewhere in the top 25, and will probably settle in somewhere around 12-15 in a few months. Here’s a thought experiment to gauge this: Cardoso or Prechdel could take Key’s place on Tennessee and there’d be no fall off in play. Shaylee Gonzalez could probably start at pg for them and they’d be better for it. Or consider Amihere — she comes off the bench at SC but would be the main talent at Tennessee. By extension, I’m not sure I’d prefer Dye to Aaliyah Moore, or even Mwenentanda, much less Jada Boyd.
I also give Tennessee credit for not having a purely cream puff schedule. We could fault Stanford, for example, for this, other than playing SC. Taking this into account, Tennessee is not as bad as the Portal Patchwork Power Five teams, who could look good for awhile only by playing cream puffs. They played a series of medium level teams and their incoherence as a team was exposed. But they’ll gel soon enough and won’t lose to these teams again. They may look pathetic now, but this won’t last.
November has always been a disruptive month, and this has been exaggerated in the era of portal madness. Sportswriters have been slow to recognize this. As a result, we got a lot of very unrealistic rankings to start the season. I think it was possible to anticipate a lot of the so-called upsets this month, if folks had given more weight to the value of continuity. But credulity was the order of the day at the AP and ESPN.