It is? How is it a substantial collection of talent? Horston and Jackson were top 5 recruits coming out of HS. I watched Pissot play this summer and was shocked she skyrocketed up to 11 in ESPN's rankings. she's more a 25-30 kid, but that's just my opinion.
Every other recruit on that team was outside the top 40 coming out of HS. Except Hollingshead who was 37. Key was 47. Powell was 73. Most of the recruits for Tennessee who Harper landed were in the 40's or 50's. It's a solid team but not a team filled with a substantial collection of talent.
BTW I'm not picking on you - TONS of people, including the so-called experts - were giddy at Tennessee's prospects this season given "all their talent".
I will admit that Horston and Jackson are individually talented, and Powell is MUCH better than her ranking coming out of HS. But you have a team that actually seems to have negative chemistry, 2 alpha-dog players who don't seem to want to co-exist together, zero offensive teaching over the summer or the 1st 2 months of the season, and this is what you get.
IMHO Tennessee has some nice pieces. I always thought they were a top 20'ish team. And for the record, I think UCONN, Stanford, SC, ND, and maybe LSU and Arizona have substantial collections of talent. Just my $.02...