MattMang23
Adding Nothing to the Conversation
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2011
- Messages
- 5,142
- Reaction Score
- 14,700
Hahaha we are ahead of BC.
Plenty of UConn fans who get it? If so, exactly what conference did we get thrown out of?
http://www.sportsmediawatch.com/college-football-tv-ratings/What is missing...and a list of values that we may never be privy to, is the valuation that ESPN and/or Fox puts on one conference realignment team add vs another...
It is a surety that the conferences consult their media contract partners when expanding.
What's really telling is that even though the criteria heavily favored the P5 (by including conference payouts among other things), these schools still finished within the ranks of P5 schools:
BYU, UConn, UCF, San Diego St., USF, New Mexico, Cincinnati, Temple
The Big East was a power conference under the old BCS model. That model changed, using a ridiculous set of criteria (old boys network, who has won the most football games in the past 1-2 seasons, turf wars, etc), and we were essentially a "have" school that has been stuck playing with the "have nots". Heave, thrown out, or not re-invited…it's all the same thing: we lost a seat in a power conference that we previously held (and performed well in).
No, you totally missed the point (which was your point). You were talking about schools getting thrown out of conferences. You then spoke about UConn as an example.
We have the distinction of being the only school thrown into a conference against it's will.
I also found it interesting that the "football school" of Clemson, GT, and Miami were ranked so low. Maybe this is accurate, but if they are so invaluable as compared to the remaining ACC, why does it seem as if they have been making the final decisions along with FSU for the past few years? My feeling is that the criteria used does not favor football enough to show the true value of a school with respect to conference realignment because football has been heavily weighed in recent realignments.
We are in an actual conference? News to me....
Yes it does but concentrate on the in conference games on similar outlets and compare the numbers. That is what drives value. Eyeballs.Which ESPN channel certainly matters:
0.7
1.04M8:30 PMLouisvilleConnecticutESPN2
3.5
5.73M8:00 PMMichiganUConn
ABC
0.1
92K12:00 PMRutgersUConnESPNU
0.0
56K12:00 PMUConnCincinnati
ESPNU
Which ESPN channel certainly matters:
0.7
1.04M8:30 PMLouisvilleConnecticutESPN2
3.5
5.73M8:00 PMMichiganUConn
ABC
0.1
92K12:00 PMRutgersUConnESPNU
0.0
56K12:00 PMUConnCincinnati
ESPNU
Notre Dame #19? Okay. Maybe #19 among pro football teams.
The Big East was a power conference under the old BCS model. That model changed, using a ridiculous set of criteria (old boys network, who has won the most football games in the past 1-2 seasons, turf wars, etc), and we were essentially a "have" school that has been stuck playing with the "have nots". Heave, thrown out, or not re-invited…it's all the same thing: we lost a seat in a power conference that we previously held (and performed well in).
I know I'm biased here, but I don't believe that Minnesota, California, and Michigan State are all worth more than ND in CR.
ND is valuable for the same reason American Idol is valuable. The casual consumer knows what it is and may check it out once in a while.
Not exactly. The Big East stopped being a power conference when too many of the members that played the highest revenue sport (football) left. Any current P-5 conference could suffer a similar fate if something were to happen to cause enough members to leave for another conference. The BE's fatal flaw was that inherit in its design (which was reasonable as it was the initial purpose of the conference) was allowing too much power (relative to other major conferences) to basketball only members. The result of this was the instability that led to the football members being willing participants in raids from other conferences. Our football members were easier pickings solelybecause of the makeup of our conference.
ND has a very small alumni base, but a very large fan base. The student body makes up less than 10% of the stadium but they have sold out every game but one since 1963. I don't think there is another school in the country that has a student body that makes up only 10% of the stadium? I guess there is a chicken or egg situation here , is ND popular because it has it's own network deal, or do they have their own network deal because they are popular. I think they have the network deal because they are popular which is why the Big Ten, Big 12, and ACC all wanted them.
Very interesting and you're points rings true to me? They do have a strong,fanatical core though and probably always will.There are die hard fans that live in the area. That is absolutely correct. No doubt that ND has a very solid and passionate fan base around the campus and in major cities where there are a lot of alumni like New York City and Chicago. However, the ratings on TV are mostly because of hype for games and prime time spots. I live in the Boston area and have never met a ND fan that does not have a direct connection to the school. One would think Boston could be a place where ND would be popular because of the Irish Catholic connection and no natural college football team to root for but a very passionate football fan base (it's just a fact for BC unfortunately. i rooted for them growing up and it was embarrassing because the fan support was so bad) There's going to be basically no support in places where college football is big and there are major state schools to root for. There are plenty of eye balls watching ND play because people love college football and ND is on prime time against many good opponents, but they are not fans of ND. Again, ND is special because of the TV network connection. I'm not saying that if they lose that than they fall off the face of the earth. I'm saying they will drop back into the 2nd tier of teams with very good local fan support and tradition. ND has disadvantages like being a small religious affiliated school and fairly isolated in a cold environment. So recruiting will be tougher for them in a lot of ways than USC, Miami, or Texas. That doesn't mean that tradition, fan support, and academics won't draw recruits. However, you would have to be extremely optimistic to think ND could compete on equal ground with the top 10 teams in the country. It is well documented that recruits choose ND because of the TV exposure they get. It's obvious why a recruit would still choose ND if they were a part of the big 10 over schools like UConn, Wake forest, or even Indiana. But why would they choose ND over Michigan or Stanford? Its seems like Michigan and Stanford can offer everything ND can, but also give a different college experience that most athletes would prefer. This transition wouldn't' happen over night. There would still be about 5 years after joining a conference that ND would enjoy their advantages, but that would begin to fade soon after.
The Highland's and Islands were also Scottish strongholds of Catholicism who eventually(b4 the IrishC) emigrated to Canada and the US after Bonnie Prince Charles the so called Pretender fled to France with Flora(MacEachern)- MacDonalds help from the isles and eventually died loyalist in NC.As I have mentioned before, so take it as a caveat on my ND opinions, I was educated grades 1-12 by Dominicans and Jesuits.
Even the very old battle axes of nuns like Sister Connie Sue (Sister Consuela), loved to talk about Notre Dame. Would always drop that she had once met so and so.
The deep south of the 1950's, was virulently anti-Catholic and was considered "mission territory". Many of the nuns and priests were exported from Ireland. Notre Dame was a banner of green in a sea of orange. And they cheered on the Irish and brainwashed several generations of catholic educated kids.