We always had multiple PGs. If one goes down, you're screwed.
This was Ollie's biggest personnel problem, IMO. When Alterique went down, you were left without a pure PG.
You always need at least 2 top PGs on the team. If one goes down and you only have one, you're screwed. They don't need to play together more than 5-10 minutes anyway.
The issue isnt about how many point guards you have. We all agree you need multiple point guards in case of injury and such.
The argument is about whether or not relying on 2 undersized point guards with pretty much the same skill set, year projection, need for the ball in their hands etc. is a good plan. If one can play off the ball, maybe it works. Or if one can accept not starting.
Maybe it would've worked, who knows.
But it feels like a combination of Gilbert, Gaffney, B Adams, Vital, Bouknight give you 5 different types of guards with different sizes and skillsets.