Postgrad Watch 3.0 | Page 4 | The Boneyard

Postgrad Watch 3.0

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Sep 16, 2011
Messages
48,813
Reaction Score
167,587
That makes more sense.

I disagree with your conclusion, but appreciate your reasoning.

I think it is in the best interests of both parties that he go elsewhere. He's got one year left - he can actually get on the court and contribute for a lot of teams, just not at this level.
Agree with you, it would be better for both parties if he ended up elsewhere but he already contributed greatly to a national championship team. Got it done at this level on the biggest stage.
 

Dogbreath2U

RIP, DB2U
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
3,495
Reaction Score
6,708
I think you'll see a lot of rotations with Jackson at the four and Larrier on the wing. I don't think we'll see Larrier at the four much - at best, he might be a point forward down the road, but he's more of a wing/shooting guard at this point.

A lot of what they do will depend on what happens with Durham. If he improves, they really have a lot of options one through four.

First, agree tsam should not come back to UConn. He made some contributions as a freshman, but that was under completely ideal circumstances for him where he had talent all around and did not have to try to do more than he was capable.

Second, I also think that Durham is a key to next year. He is the one who I felt did not get the attention he should have this year, although who knows what he showed in practice. He was too nice and too deferential as a freshman. I hope he can find some inner Jeff Adrien because he might not produce much if he does not compensate for his thin frame with aggressive play, quickness, and smarts. Juwan could be awesome as the guy who flashes to the foul line against zones. I hope that KO gives him the message that he needs to be a key player for next year's team to be good.

I hope that Vance can get stronger and quicker to be able to give us solid minutes at the 4 as well as the 3. Not easy to improve quickness, but hope he makes lateral movement a priority for defense.
 

Fishy

Elite Premium Poster
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
18,109
Reaction Score
131,794
Agree with you, it would be better for both parties if he ended up elsewhere but he already contributed greatly to a national championship team. Got it done at this level on the biggest stage.

Ah, that's really overstating his contributions.

He did virtually nothing in the regular season. Played very well against Nova and Iowa State in the tournament. Did nothing as a sophomore and just lost his spot on the roster at Penn State. High-major hoop is not where he belongs.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
9,345
Reaction Score
23,550
That makes more sense.

I disagree with your conclusion, but appreciate your reasoning.

I think it is in the best interests of both parties that he go elsewhere. He's got one year left - he can actually get on the court and contribute for a lot of teams, just not at this level.

I don't disagree with that. I mentioned a school like New Hampshire earlier - they lost both starting guards but return an all-conference caliber front court and figure to compete for the America East crown. That's a situation where Samuel could come in, play big minutes, and work towards a grad degree.

If he's hell-bent on returning to UConn and willing to twist in the wind for a few weeks, I don't think a reunion would hurt either party.
 
Joined
Sep 16, 2011
Messages
48,813
Reaction Score
167,587
Ah, that's really overstating his contributions.

He did virtually nothing in the regular season. Played very well against Nova and Iowa State in the tournament. Did nothing as a sophomore and just lost his spot on the roster at Penn State. High-major hoop is not where he belongs.
Just pointing out again how unfair it is saying he can't compete at this level. You don't play the way he did against a couple of the best teams in the country in the tournament if you can't play at this level. I do agree he should look towards a mid-major/lower tier team to finish his career out as a starter instead of an end of the bench guy though.
 
Joined
Dec 8, 2015
Messages
12,668
Reaction Score
96,175
I think you'll see a lot of rotations with Jackson at the four and Larrier on the wing. I don't think we'll see Larrier at the four much - at best, he might be a point forward down the road, but he's more of a wing/shooting guard at this point.

A lot of what they do will depend on what happens with Durham. If he improves, they really have a lot of options one through four.

Agreed, I don't know why people keep thinking larrier is more suited to the for than Jackson. Jackson is 6'8-9 and 230lbs. He has perfect college 4 size.

With Jackson playing outside on O we could pull a big man from the basket.

On the other end, it could maybe help to mitigate some of jacksons lead-footedness if he could play inside more.

It's not a 35mpg option, but with certain matchups, especially if Jackson can get stronger, it could be very helpful
 

Fishy

Elite Premium Poster
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
18,109
Reaction Score
131,794
Just pointing out again how unfair it is saying he can't compete at this level.

It's most definitely not unfair - he's proven that he cannot contribute at a high-major level. He simply cannot score - he's played three years and scored in double digits maybe four times?

It's fortunate for us that he had two games where he played well in the tournament, but two programs have now pointed him towards the door. One of them was Penn State which is pretty close to the bottom of the high-major barrel.
 
Joined
Nov 18, 2012
Messages
3,472
Reaction Score
8,610
Big NO from me. Not a team player and a guy entirely focused on getting his points and nothing else. I've seen him play the past 2 seasons at UNM and he's the type of player we do not need.

Isn't he Mike Brown son? I'm pretty sure he would be team oriented and not a me first player on uconn coming off the bench in a new role

Not sure if Ollie and Mike Brown were ever on the same team as coach/player
 

Huskyforlife

Akokbouk
Joined
Feb 19, 2013
Messages
12,148
Reaction Score
49,317
Adding Samuel as the 13th man does nothing to hurt this team, I think people forget during a normal season that players 11-13 don't play. It would be nice to bring him back.
 

Matrim55

Why is it so hard To make it in America
Joined
Feb 10, 2013
Messages
6,022
Reaction Score
55,546
Love TSam but he was vastly overrated defensively.
His defense against PGs was overrated. His ability to guard 2s and 3s is somehow becoming underrated.

I understand @Fishy's reluctance and still agree there are other, better fits. But Samuel's defense & speed on the break in certain situations were major weapons for us once KO figured out his rotations as a freshman – putting a third guy on the court who could guard SFs but still run the break was a legit game-changer, especially against Villanova.

Regardless it seems this is moot. I believe the folks who are saying we don't have any real interest in a reunion.
 
H

huskymagic

Fish why do we need a big man according to you Cobb is really good so that along with the returning bigs should give us plenty of depth in the front court. Of course Ollie shouldn't have wasted a scholarship on Cobb to begin with and should have been looking for a good Euro/Australian big man who can play instead like the types Michigan, Xavier, Butler, St. Mary's, Gonzaga's etc always seem to have.

Unless we can get a Shak Juiston or a Kam Johnson(a more athletic/defensively sound Vance Jackson not to mention a great shooter) with the last scholarship, it doesn't hurt to give T-Sam the last scholarship if he is looking to return and not be a hero at Iona. It's not like the 13th guy on the bench is expected to be a major contributor. Ollie isn't getting anyone good late for next year as the Cobb signing indicates.
 

Stainmaster

Occasionally Constructive
Joined
Aug 7, 2014
Messages
22,004
Reaction Score
41,501
Of course Ollie shouldn't have wasted a scholarship on Cobb to begin with

You are far less smart than Ollie is, so how you could say this is beyond me.
 
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
2,396
Reaction Score
8,846
TSam is not coming here and we don't need him. What we need is not him. He's a Husky and I love his contributions for us but yeah. Any decently athletically gifted player can come in and have a few minutes here and there of magic that make us pine for him to play more. It's like rooting for the backup quarterback all the time. I fall for it just like everyone else but yeah.
Most of the minutes Noyes got this year were to have him give fouls at the end of games because our starters were always in foul trouble.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
535
Reaction Score
1,124
We don't need a stud big man; 3 of UCONN's championships were won without one. Just a serviceable one. He has to be able to rebound/D/set screens/pass a little and score garbage. We'll see about the guys on our roster.

Think we are saying pretty much the same thing. I mentioned D and rebounding. Add your screening and passing and we are on the same page. A Jake or an AO would be a major upgrade to what it appears we have at the 5 next year. However, I would love to have a true stud as it opens up the inside-out game which we have not had recently.
 

HuskyHawk

The triumphant return of the Blues Brothers.
Joined
Sep 12, 2011
Messages
32,065
Reaction Score
82,508
You are far less smart than Ollie is, so how you could say this is beyond me.

I love the irony of people worrying about depth at center and saying we wasted a scholarship on Cobb. Are people even watching the NCAA tournament? A lot of teams with 6'9" space eaters at the 5. I think Durham will be solid and put on some muscle too since he's finally not injured.
 

RayIsTheGOAT

Sticks, to the rafters
Joined
Apr 5, 2015
Messages
2,947
Reaction Score
20,595


Here's a Post Grad worth considering. For those of you who can remember three years ago a common opinion on this board from Janury on was that we "always seem to go on a run when TSAM is in the lineup". In this video TSAM gets 2 points, 1 rebound, and an assist from the forward position.

I see TSAM as a point forward in a three guard lineup. He is not a point guard.

No. We need a big or a sniper that we know can contribute immediately.
Only way we should consider taking back TSam is if we have ABSOLUTELY no options to fill a need.
 

UConnSwag11

Storrs, CT The Mecca
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
13,969
Reaction Score
52,923


Here's a Post Grad worth considering. For those of you who can remember three years ago a common opinion on this board from Janury on was that we "always seem to go on a run when TSAM is in the lineup". In this video TSAM gets 2 points, 1 rebound, and an assist from the forward position.

I see TSAM as a point forward in a three guard lineup. He is not a point guard.

dude no way...not at all
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
33,619
Reaction Score
97,020
I love the irony of people worrying about depth at center and saying we wasted a scholarship on Cobb. Are people even watching the NCAA tournament? A lot of teams with 6'9" space eaters at the 5. I think Durham will be solid and put on some muscle too since he's finally not injured.

I know he's not going to be like Shaq from Wichita State but similar body and their defense with I'm in the middle was really good clogging it up. Don't need shot blockers as much as you need smart space eaters. Agree Hawk!!
 

pj

Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
8,621
Reaction Score
25,058
I think most informed posters with half a brain would disagree with you. He was the "6th man" in 14 and a key cog. Apparently he also ran over your dog which is unfortunate.

Terence Samuel 2014 stats, 2013-14 UConn Huskies Roster and Stats | College Basketball at Sports-Reference.com: 9th on the team in minutes played with 9.0 per game; 9th on the team in points with 1.4 per game; 12th on the team in rebounds with 0.9 per game. For a "sixth" man he's awfully 9th-12th ish.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
33,619
Reaction Score
97,020
And yet we don't win a national champiship in 14 without him. So suck on that.

Are you kidding me? He made some plays in some big moments no doubt. But he was never a very good player, hard nosed kid who couldn't shoot a lick and handled it like a forward. But timing is everything and AB knows a little about that too. Doesn't mean these are people we need or want. He was never the best player off the bench or the 6th man unless it was him they needed right away. This was not a microwave coming off the bench.

Hey again, some big moments I will be forever grateful for as a Husky fan. But this is a huge pass.
 

intlzncster

i fart in your general direction
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
29,091
Reaction Score
60,514
Are you kidding me? He made some plays in some big moments no doubt. But he was never a very good player, hard nosed kid who couldn't shoot a lick and handled it like a forward. But timing is everything and AB knows a little about that too. Doesn't mean these are people we need or want. He was never the best player off the bench or the 6th man unless it was him they needed right away. This was not a microwave coming off the bench.

Hey again, some big moments I will be forever grateful for as a Husky fan. But this is a huge pass.

Come to think of it, imagine Brimah's story were he a 2nd or 3rd option at the 5 his whole career. He might be really well thought of here. He just wasn't a starting caliber center at UCONN.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
1,604
Reaction Score
4,437
This thread is about if we should take Terrence Samuel back.... was not expecting that.

Absolutely not. Agree with fishy clearly not a high major guard.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
510
Guests online
2,669
Total visitors
3,179

Forum statistics

Threads
157,142
Messages
4,085,107
Members
9,981
Latest member
Vincent22


Top Bottom