I provided a link to Feinstein's article and also pointed out you could see the spitting incident on Youtube. It appears you don't want evidence. If you do some basic googling, you can find ten pages of evidence in a couple of minutes.
And you clearly haven't watched a lot of Tiger if you haven't seen incidents of spoiled-rotten behavior. I have seen dozens - including five or six at events I attended in person. As for petulant, use a dictionary. (You may find Tiger's picture beside the definition.) And as for Pavarotti, if he acted in the same unacceptable way as Tiger, I'd have the same comments. Your analogy, however, is deeply flawed - uncivil behavior is completely different than physical appearance.
Another comment from Feinstein about Tiger's unacceptable behavior:
"This time it isn’t an f-bomb or a thrown club or his vigilante caddie. This time he was clearly caught on-camera spitting on the 12th green on Sunday in Dubai.
Honestly though, the real issue here isn’t that Woods did what he did. It was wrong and the E
uropean Tour was completely justified in fining him for his regression to behavior that most of us know isn’t acceptable by about the age of five. Of course that brings up the real problem: No one has ever really explained to Woods that there are certain things you don’t do on a golf course."
http://www.golfchannel.com/news/john-feinstein/not-fine-by-us/[/quote]
The sarcastic and condescending tone of Mr. Feinstein' s article says that his issues with Tiger Woods are not new. I'll need something better than one spitting incident, one club throw and a bag of F=Bombs over a 14 year career. Mr. Fienstein is bandering to the same element that found fault with Jackie Robinson while trying to make himself known by flinging mud. (JMO of course) You may draw your own conclusions.