The US fields a team every two years to play against Europe or Australia.
So you are saying that you really, really dislike Tiger because he has been, in your opinion since you provide no data in support of your assertions, a "pretty mediocre" team performer.
You seem to ignore the fact that "pretty mediocre" for tiger is still better than most of the players on the US team.
You also seem willing to ignore the fact that when Tiger plays people will come out to watch him play. (Almost always in very, very large numbers.)
Oh, did I forget to mention Tiger's impact of tv viewership?
Peace,
John Fryer
You seem to be in awe of Tiger. It's nice that you are happy with him, but it does not change my opinion of him at all..
Right, I provided no data to support my "assertion". That's why I said "last time I checked". Maybe you ignored those words. In any case, it should be pretty clear that I don't care to watch him play. I did watch him fail to be a clutch player for his country enough times in the past to form my opinion. You don't like my opinion?. Enlighten me with some data, and maybe I will change it.. But I doubt you can come up with anything to show that he is anything more than a mediocre player when it comes to performing for his country. You don't like mediocre? Fine, change the word to average.
And "still better than most of the players on his team", huh? You have any data to back up that assertion? Still, "better than most" is a pretty low bar for someone who is supposed to be the best golfer in the world, according to some.. He's supposed to be the best golfer in the world, so I would expect him to be the best in playing for his country. But he does not measure up to that, and that matters to me, matters a lot.
I don't care about the rest of your post because it does not relate to what I was talking about, which is whether or not he is a "clutch" player when it comes to playing for his country.