OT: Giants | Page 4 | The Boneyard

OT: Giants

if there is an Elliott type RB available in the draft - take him
How many OLs have they taken in the draft?
Go with free agents there
And QB - any draft choice worth anything will be a step in and play guy- what do you do with Eli?
 
gtcam said:
if there is an Elliott type RB available in the draft - take him
How many OLs have they taken in the draft?
Go with free agents there
And QB - any draft choice worth anything will be a step in and play guy- what do you do with Eli?
Expand ...
There is that type of RB available, Saquon Barkley from PSU. And I wouldn't touch him with a top 5 pick. The shelf life of a RB is so short that I don't even think it's worth the investment. Give me the franchise QB, especially as a franchise that is so rarely in a position to be able to take that kind of a player.
 
Fire the coach and GM. Trade Odell for a couple solid linemen. Draft an RB and we're good. One more crack with Eli while looking to the future
 
.-.
Edward Sargent said:
Agreed. Collins is the best player on the team and the coach has lost him
Expand ...

CardiacAndre7 said:
Trade Odell? Have you seen what our team is like without him? C'mon now...
Expand ...

Odell is the best player on the Giants and it's not particularly close.

I'm a huge Giants fan, I don't really like or understand Beckham, but he is an absolutely transcendent offensive player.
 
Drafting a QB and giving Eli another year or two are not mutually exclusive. They need to start looking for a QB even if Eli was playing at a high level (hes not), dude is going to be 37 before this season is over.
 
nomar said:
I mean, there certainly always have been die-hard Pats fans, but football was never that important in Boston until Brady and Belichick arrived.
Expand ...
Not quite true. The season ticket waiting list began with the Big Tuna.
 
navery12 said:
There is that type of RB available, Saquon Barkley from PSU. And I wouldn't touch him with a top 5 pick. The shelf life of a RB is so short that I don't even think it's worth the investment. Give me the franchise QB, especially as a franchise that is so rarely in a position to be able to take that kind of a player.
Expand ...
I agree. I like him. We need a kickoff returner real bad. Barkley wears a few hats. I also like the QB fo rOhio State, Barrett?Bartlett? The QB profile is changing back to mobile QB's. I am in Penn State country. Not a fan at all. Howver I did watch the Ohio State-Penn State game and those two player are impressive. Barkley can stop on a dime and find a hole in the OL for yardage. Okay we need a O-Line, but he will be too tough to pass over. Giants need to lose to 49er's Sunday. Although I have followed the Giants since I can crawl up to the TV , it is time to hoist the white flag. The whole team is terrible. Anybody remember a Giants defense allowing so many points? Especially with Spags. I know all the DE's are disabled list. Now is the time to try out other players.
 
.-.
Hankster said:
I agree. I like him. We need a kickoff returner real bad. Barkley wears a few hats. I also like the QB fo rOhio State, Barrett?Bartlett? The QB profile is changing back to mobile QB's. I am in Penn State country. Not a fan at all. Howver I did watch the Ohio State-Penn State game and those two player are impressive. Barkley can stop on a dime and find a hole in the OL for yardage. Okay we need a O-Line, but he will be too tough to pass over. Giants need to lose to 49er's Sunday. Although I have followed the Giants since I can crawl up to the TV , it is time to hoist the white flag. The whole team is terrible. Anybody remember a Giants defense allowing so many points? Especially with Spags. I know all the DE's are disabled list. Now is the time to try out other players.
Expand ...

Sorry Hankster a huge no thanks on Bartlett. I mean when he's good he's fun to watch but he's not good enough in the college game to transition to the next level. I'm not even sure who the "next one" is even if they lose out the season, tough call and they all have their inconsistencies and weaknesses. The only reason the game has changed is because too many teams have crappy OLines, get a solid defense, same on the OLine and a pocket passer who can move just enough you have a better chance to win. Ask upstater LOL.

I do like Barkely though I agree there. Not sure you can waste that #1 on him though too many other needs.
 
Hankster said:
I agree. I like him. We need a kickoff returner real bad. Barkley wears a few hats. I also like the QB fo rOhio State, Barrett?Bartlett? The QB profile is changing back to mobile QB's. I am in Penn State country. Not a fan at all. Howver I did watch the Ohio State-Penn State game and those two player are impressive. Barkley can stop on a dime and find a hole in the OL for yardage. Okay we need a O-Line, but he will be too tough to pass over. Giants need to lose to 49er's Sunday. Although I have followed the Giants since I can crawl up to the TV , it is time to hoist the white flag. The whole team is terrible. Anybody remember a Giants defense allowing so many points? Especially with Spags. I know all the DE's are disabled list. Now is the time to try out other players.
Expand ...
The points against are due to Spags one dimensional defense. Blitzing everyone every down. That’s it. That’s all he does. Even without the right personnel. He is worse than mcadoo if I may say.
 
nomar said:
Doesn't quite have the same ring to it.

And what did we draft Webb for?
Expand ...

Well, I don't think going 1-15 this year was the plan on Draft day. When you have the chance to draft the next Aaron Rodgers, you have to!
 
TitleTown said:
Well, I don't think going 1-15 this year was the plan on Draft day. When you have the chance to draft the next Aaron Rodgers, you have to!
Expand ...

OK, Mrs. Rosen!

I don't see him as a sure thing. And Rodgers went #24.
 
.-.
Until the front office has people who can evaluate offensive line talent and prioritizes improving that position all Giants QB's will look bad. With a pick in the top 5 which the Giants are virtually guaranteed they can go after a QB or go the Accorsi route and get the best pass rusher available.
 
ConnHuskBask said:
Reese and McAdoo need to be gone come the end of the season.

We'll have a high pick and if a QB is available that the new front office deems worthy of that selection, you take them.

Try to revamp the line as much as we can and give it a final shot with Eli in 2018.

Come 2019 the new QB and Davis Webb will have to win the job with Eli gone.

I must say I was willfully blind and bought into the McAdoo and Giant hype coming into this season.

I hate tanking as I think it's toxic to the culture of the organization but if we finish 1-15 so be it.

P.S. lord help them if they take a running back with a top 5 pick. QB or OL.
Expand ...
Agree. Anyone clamoring for a RB does not really understand how the game is played. You need an OL to block for them. See Gurley, Todd. Stunk last year, team redid the OL (signing Whitworth when that genius Reese passed on him) and now he is an MVP candidate. Of the top 5 leading rushers, all have good to great OLs, and also only 2 were taken in Round 1. Fix the OL is the priority not find another RB who will get hit at or behind the line of scrimmage every play.

Reese is the biggest issue with this team, and Mara for being stupid enough to still employ him. Reese threw away four drafts in the last 6 years.3 players he drafted from 2011-13 are still in the league. By way of comparison Seattle has 18 during that time frame. Reese is arguably the worst GM in sports. He was given a HOF QB and an amazing foundation which won a SB from Acorsi and he has driven it off a cliff. I despise that man for what he has done to this franchise.

I love Spags, but the whole staff needs to go and a new GM needs to be allowed to hire from the ground up.

Keep Eli's start streak going but get Webb some action to see what he has got, hard to play with no OL and no WRs, but at least see what happens when you threw him into the fire. Then decide if you want to draft Rosen or Darnold, or take OL with that pick (or trade it to move back with the Jets or someone else).

A new GM and coach and proper roster management can have this team back in the playoffs next year I believe. There are pieces there (I honestly did not know whether to laugh or threw my laptop out my window when I read someone on here say to trade Odell).
 
If they are in a spot to draft a QB that is a pretty sure thing they should trade Eli for high picks to get more OL and DE's or LB's. I am tired of seeing Eli lose the ball when hit while passing. Brady takes shots all the time and does not fumble.
 
jdb50 said:
If they are in a spot to draft a QB that is a pretty sure thing they should trade Eli for high picks to get more OL and DE's or LB's. I am tired of seeing Eli lose the ball when hit while passing. Brady takes shots all the time and does not fumble.
Expand ...
Only 1 active Player has more fumbles lost than Eli and it’s Brady. Nice try though
 
jdb50 said:
If they are in a spot to draft a QB that is a pretty sure thing they should trade Eli for high picks to get more OL and DE's or LB's. I am tired of seeing Eli lose the ball when hit while passing. Brady takes shots all the time and does not fumble.
Expand ...
I'm just about the biggest Eli supporter there is, I want to see him retire as a Giant. But who is taking Eli? He's run the course with Giants fans and the organization he's won 2 Super Bowls for. Not exactly an encouraging sign there would be any interest for another team to pay him big money
 
.-.
jdb50 said:
If they are in a spot to draft a QB that is a pretty sure thing they should trade Eli for high picks to get more OL and DE's or LB's. I am tired of seeing Eli lose the ball when hit while passing. Brady takes shots all the time and does not fumble.
Expand ...

Say you had a trade partner, a team with a great D, some pieces on O, and just needing a QB. Somebody like Denver. How much you think you'd get for Eli? I'm betting not more than a 5th atm.
 
intlzncster said:
Say you had a trade partner, a team with a great D, some pieces on O, and just needing a QB. Somebody like Denver. How much you think you'd get for Eli? I'm betting not more than a 5th atm.
Expand ...
Sounds about right, but the Giants are not trading Eli. End of story.
 
mauconnfan said:
Sorry Hankster a huge no thanks on Bartlett. I mean when he's good he's fun to watch but he's not good enough in the college game to transition to the next level. I'm not even sure who the "next one" is even if they lose out the season, tough call and they all have their inconsistencies and weaknesses. The only reason the game has changed is because too many teams have crappy OLines, get a solid defense, same on the OLine and a pocket passer who can move just enough you have a better chance to win. Ask upstater LOL.

I do like Barkely though I agree there. Not sure you can waste that #1 on him though too many other needs.
Expand ...
I gess Mau what I am getting at, it is time we get a QB who sees good coverage down field and runs for the first down. I thought I saw one game he scampered for 88 yards. Actually that is why you have running backs. However quick thinking and off to the races. No complaints on a QB who stays in the pocket but, well with the OL we have a mobile QB MAY have been the difference in some games. I recall many games where the defense backs had good coverage where we were burnt by a mobile QB.
 
Hankster said:
I gess Mau what I am getting at, it is time we get a QB who sees good coverage down field and runs for the first down. I thought I saw one game he scampered for 88 yards. Actually that is why you have running backs. However quick thinking and off to the races. No complaints on a QB who stays in the pocket but, well with the OL we have a mobile QB MAY have been the difference in some games. I recall many games where the defense backs had good coverage where we were burnt by a mobile QB.
Expand ...
JT Barrett is not even considered a late round to not even a draft able prospect. Who cares if he ran for 88 yards against Rutgers.
 
Jerry1714 said:
JT Barrett is not even considered a late round to not even a draft able prospect. Who cares if he ran for 88 yards against Rutgers.
Expand ...
He ran for 78 yards against Rutgers. He ran 17 carries for 95 yards against Penn State. If you think he should be drafted or not is your opinion. However when talking stats look at the whole picture.
 
.-.
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,379
Messages
4,569,355
Members
10,475
Latest member
Tunwin22


Top Bottom