Twenty-three wins is a big ask, but not impossible given the weakness of the Big Ten. To me, what's even more concerning than last year's anomalously dismal results was what happened two years ago, when Rutgers had two excellent seniors in Copper and Hollivay who were drafted 7th and 13th overall. But they still missed the NCAA tournament and lost in the 2nd round of the WNIT, finishing 19-15 on the season (8-10 in Big Ten).
Rutgers' OOC conference schedule, with the exception of a game vs. South Carolina in the first round of the Gulf Coast Showcase, consists of games that are winnable but mostly non-cupcakes. They open the season on the road at James Madison and Temple, both of which lost key players from last year, and these will be decent tests of the Rutgers pulse. They'll also play Wake Forest, NC State, and Virginia. If Rutgers can manage to win, say, 11 of its 14 OOC games, it would be totally realistic for them to go 10-8 in the Big Ten, especially considering that they play Penn State twice plus Wisconsin, Illinois, and Nebraska. For any team that doesn't suck, that should be 5 wins there. From there they'd just need a couple postseason wins between the B1G tourney and the WNIT/NCAA tournament.
Plebe (and Knight): Thanks for the informative and frank give and take of C. Vivian Stringer and her new extension. I've cut and pasted the link to the latest and greatest from nj.advancemedia.
Details on C. Vivian Stringer contract: Why Rutgers could keep the Hall of Famer beyond coaching
What, perhaps, was most interesting to me was this paragraph:
"Perhaps the most interesting aspect of the contract, however, is a clause that could keep the 69-year old Stringer at Rutgers in an administrative role if she decides to relinquish her head-coaching duties after the 2018-19 season."
While C.Viv says that she wants to "get comfortable" with the level of the team, she does also acknowledge -- as does AD Hobbs -- that they want her around...as a Rutgers employee. As you stated, this could allow her to get to the 1,000 win mark and try to make one more run at an NCAA invite. And then, turn "Hobbsian?"
Viv claims all the transfers who are about to play -- featuring the "rojos" -- allow her the depth to dust off the "55" pressing offense. Plus, she's got some outside shooting with Fitzpatrick, the transfer from St. Joes, which is something even the best of her teams didn't have a lot of. We'll see how the transfers and the returnees mesh.
A lot of Stringer defenders have said she needed to have a long-term contract and a practice facility to ensure she could recruit effectively. She's got the contract and Hobbs says the practice facility will open, but not until 2019, which is halfway through this extension. That could placate current recruit's questions, but me thinks the more important questions are:
- can Stringer and Rutgers ratchet up the D and have a current-enough, functioning offense to get enough wins for conference and/or post-season tourneys?
- and will she be able to recruit NJ? Currently, there is one --- 1 --- in-state player on the roster in a state that has a lot of ballplayers that could step into that roster. Can Stringer still relate? Does she have assistants that help her bridge that?
Like many, I appreciate what C. Viv has done, but am a little dubious of a complete return to the Scarlet Knight's past highest ranks. I'm hoping that she can mesh the "rojos" and returnees and get back to post-season and raise the team's visibility with HS conferences/teams in areas she used to recruit from (Newark, Patterson) and then find a successor that can take it to the next level.