- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 29,840
- Reaction Score
- 48,729
Not sure you know what a fact is.
so you're saying the Wells report is devoid of facts? I'm citing the Wells Report.
By all means, continue to vouch for Roger Vince McMahon Goodell.
Not sure you know what a fact is.
Brady most likely will be suspended for a few games next season. How is that exonerated?
I'll believe that when it actually happens. Don't hold your breath waiting.
Not really sure how you can have an "independent" report that exonerates the Patriots, then go ahead and punish the team anyway. But no one has ever accused the NFL of being logical.
Stop making strawman arguments - it says neither they nor Belichick had knowledge of the offense.I love that Pats fans think the report exonerates them, when it doesn't at all.
I love that Pats fans think the report exonerates them, when it doesn't at all.
What??? You're not acting rational. Your hero is a liar, I get that it's a tough day for you.so you're saying the Wells report is devoid of facts? I'm citing the Wells Report.
By all means, continue to vouch for Roger Vince McMahon Goodell.
Stop making strawman arguments - it says neither they nor Belichick had knowledge of the offense.
Some of you Pats-hating clowns are just as insufferable in this thread as the fanboys. My god.
Wow. I don't even like the Pats and I think this is stupid. The NFL has lost its mind here: you can't suspend a domestic abuser 1/2 has long as a player who "more likely than not" had "general knowledge" that balls were slightly below the PSI. It's ridiculous beyond words.
Sorry but it's nothing like the retroactive APR suspension. There were violations made with Nate Miles recruitment and we suffered the penalties for it. The retroactive APR is absolutely nothing like the Patriots situation and as a UConn fan you should know that. Glad you are having fun with the Patriots cheating, that's a good way to look at things.What I find most ironic in all of this as a LIFELONG Pats (yes, I watched every game from 1988-1990 when the Pats won a total of about 6 games) and UConn fan, is that the non-Pat UConn fans have no problem calling the Pats cheaters, and yet would defend Jim Calhoun to all ends of the earth as a non-cheater. What supposedly happened or didn't happen with footballs had as much to with the outcome of that game as me wearing my lucky Pats jersey. And the "crime" was just as innocent as a few extra text messages and a woeful retroactively applied APR record that has "tainted" JC's legacy just like Belichick's and Brady's will be "tainted". This is such a non-story that has been over-embellished by the media, it's sickening. I'm now beginning to think that Goodell has a simple method for handing out punishment after he was so publicly bitch-slapped for fukking up the Ray Rice suspension: the penalty is now directly proportionate to the amount of time a story gets in the media. The whole thing is a farce and I actually find great comedy in it other than all the Pat-haters coming out of the woodwork that this somehow taints their legacy....oh wait, that is in fact the funniest part of this whole drama! So have your fun non-Pat fans, but just remember that in your eyes, if you believe that the Pats really cheated and their legacy is tainted, be prepared to apply the same "logic" to the 4 time NC Huskies that everyone on this board so loves.
somehow you managed to mess the entire message of my post. if you think the Pats should be tainted, then UConn should be tainted. the "crimes" that both committed both had absolutely nothing to do with any actual game results. you, i think, are the one in denial hereSorry but it's nothing like the retroactive APR suspension. There were violations made with Nate Miles recruitment and we suffered the penalties for it. The retroactive APR is absolutely nothing like the Patriots situation and as a UConn fan you should know that. Glad you are having fun with the Patriots cheating, that's a good way to look at things.
How am I in denial? All I did was point out that the retroactive APR is nothing like the Patriots situation. If people want to say Calhoun's legacy is tainted for those extra text messages that's fine, rules were broken and we were penalized for it. You can claim the Patriots have never cheated and nothing on the field was ever compromised, I disagree with you and so does the NFL.somehow you managed to mess the entire message of my post. if you think the Pats should be tainted, then UConn should be tainted. the "crimes" that both committed both had absolutely nothing to do with any actual game results. you, i think, are the one in denial here
What??? You're not acting rational. Your hero is a liar, I get that it's a tough day for you.
uconngb said:What I find most ironic in all of this as a LIFELONG Pats (yes, I watched every game from 1988-1990 when the Pats won a total of about 6 games) and UConn fan, is that the non-Pat UConn fans have no problem calling the Pats cheaters, and yet would defend Jim Calhoun to all ends of the earth as a non-cheater. What supposedly happened or didn't happen with footballs had as much to with the outcome of that game as me wearing my lucky Pats jersey. And the "crime" was just as innocent as a few extra text messages and a woeful retroactively applied APR record that has "tainted" JC's legacy just like Belichick's and Brady's will be "tainted". This is such a non-story that has been over-embellished by the media, it's sickening. I'm now beginning to think that Goodell has a simple method for handing out punishment after he was so publicly bitch-slapped for fukking up the Ray Rice suspension: the penalty is now directly proportionate to the amount of time a story gets in the media. The whole thing is a farce and I actually find great comedy in it other than all the Pat-haters coming out of the woodwork that this somehow taints their legacy....oh wait, that is in fact the funniest part of this whole drama! So have your fun non-Pat fans, but just remember that in your eyes, if you believe that the Pats really cheated and their legacy is tainted, be prepared to apply the same "logic" to the 4 time NC Huskies that everyone on this board so loves.
Best u got?
The NFL is counting on people like you not reading the report. Which allows you to say stuff like this.
Read the report? The report says the balls were deflated and Brady likely did it. Brady said he didn't know the guy and he was texting him.
You mean read the report and conclude what Upstater concluded or I'll shout over you. I'm beginning to hope for capital punishment and I started out thinking this was a small deal.
No they didn't. It's called the ideal gas law for a reason. It's true under "ideal" conditions. You can only substitute the T with another temperature if ALL the other conditions are constant. Specifically here, the size of the container isn't fixed. It expands and contracts with all the other factors, giving you calculation error. Bottom line is you're not all wrong, but certainly your assertion that they are somehow breaking the laws of physics is absurd. There's plenty of wiggle room. By the way, it PV=nRTsledog said:Newton move over. The NFL just killed the ideal gas law: PV/T = const. Is Einstein next?? Lot of punishment for a report that was structured in'probabilities'. is