Fishy
Elite Premium Poster
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 19,303
- Reaction Score
- 178,782
Just wondering, did ND ever advocate for the ACC to invite UConn, like they did for Stanford and Cal?
Why would they?
Just wondering, did ND ever advocate for the ACC to invite UConn, like they did for Stanford and Cal?
If I knew the answer I wouldn't have asked the question.Why would they?
UConn burned that bridge in 2009. It's easier to just beat up on the bcu's of the conferenceJust wondering, did ND ever advocate for the ACC to invite UConn, like they did for Stanford and Cal?
Not according to Fishy. He does not understand that most schools fans in the ACC care nothing about football - nothing burger. Look at the the attendance for the ACC championship game this year between Duke and Virginia. Hardly anybody showed up.In the last 30 years, there have been 16 different schools that have been ranked 1st at the end of the season with their current conference:
SEC: 8 schools
Big 10: 5 schools
ACC: 3 schools
With Ole Miss and Indiana in the playoff this year, and Indiana winning the national championship, I would say most Big 10 or SEC school have a chance to win a national championship. Revenue sharing and NIL changed everything.
6 of ND's 12 opponents are selected by the ACC, not ND.
The second part of your sentence is subjective emotive BS.
That was the consolation game. There were 38,000 at the actual ACC Championship Game in East Hartford.Not according to Fishy. He does not understand that most schools fans in the ACC care nothing about football - nothing burger. Look at the the attendance for the ACC championship game this year between Duke and Virginia. Hardly anybody showed up.
Notre Dame advocates for Notre Dame.Just wondering, did ND ever advocate for the ACC to invite UConn, like they did for Stanford and Cal?
I don't believe that ND has a seat at the football decision table They do for basketball and the Olympic sports.Just wondering, did ND ever advocate for the ACC to invite UConn, like they did for Stanford and Cal?
I do wonder if entering into the 10 year deal with ND would have changed our circumstances at all. To be fair, I wouldn't mind a couple of Rentschler games thrown in there. Maybe something like Notre Dame home, neutral NYC, Rentschler Field, Notre Dame home, neutral Foxborough and then repeatUConn burned that bridge in 2009. It's easier to just beat up on the bcu's of the conference
It feels like that was 60 years ago, had almost completely forgotten about that proposed deal.I do wonder if entering into the 10 year deal with ND would have changed our circumstances at all. To be fair, I wouldn't mind a a couple of Renschler game thrown in there. Maybe something like Notre Dame home, neutral NYC, Renschler field, Notre Dame home neutral Foxborough and then repeat
I hate when politicians involve themselves in UConn athletics. In this case, they queered a deal that would have, in all likelihood, been very helpful to Connecticut football. Same thing when Chris Murphy chirped up to be critical of Connecticut moving to the big 12. I can't say that it was the proverbial straw that broke the camels back, but it definitely didn't help.It feels like that was 60 years ago, had almost completely forgotten about that proposed deal.
And that will never change.Notre Dame advocates for Notre Dame.
Until they are the new MotorolaAnd that will never change.
Yep...I had an online beef with that has-been Desmond Connor on this very issue. Notre Dame willing to do an annual deal with Uconn, would of been a brand maker for our new FB program. (and could of lead to an ACC invite)
But as always some nobody media types and a few politicians thought otherwise and let a "talent buy" for our resume (aka one of the best brands in CFB) walk, because they got but hurt it was a 3-5-1-1 deal. Gee playin' games in NY or MA doesn't seem to hurt the hoops team, SMH ! (it's called negotiate and didn't we do an Army game in NYC ?)
From Sacramento to Amherst and everything in between:
-> The MAC has yet to release its 2026 conference football schedule. The league loses Northern Illinois this coming year and added UMass last year to remain at 12 member schools. The conference also has upcoming negotiations with ESPN for its new television deal.
Under the plan, Sacramento State’s other sports would remain with the Big West — a model, as it turns out, similar to Northern Illinois, which left the MAC to play only football in the Mountain West with most other sports in the Horizon. <-
From Sacramento to Amherst and everything in between:
-> The MAC has yet to release its 2026 conference football schedule. The league loses Northern Illinois this coming year and added UMass last year to remain at 12 member schools. The conference also has upcoming negotiations with ESPN for its new television deal.
Under the plan, Sacramento State’s other sports would remain with the Big West — a model, as it turns out, similar to Northern Illinois, which left the MAC to play only football in the Mountain West with most other sports in the Horizon. <-
From Sacramento to Amherst and everything in between:
-> The MAC has yet to release its 2026 conference football schedule. The league loses Northern Illinois this coming year and added UMass last year to remain at 12 member schools. The conference also has upcoming negotiations with ESPN for its new television deal.
Under the plan, Sacramento State’s other sports would remain with the Big West — a model, as it turns out, similar to Northern Illinois, which left the MAC to play only football in the Mountain West with most other sports in the Horizon. <-
California has 40 million people so this is pocket change for a state run school. They set a goal of getting to FBS and got there. It's not the PAC 12 but it's FBS$18 million to the MAC, $5 million to join the FBS, $1 million in NIL. That’s $24 million right there. And no revenue sharing from the MAC.
Where are they getting their money?
The MAC schools would take one trip to CA every three years.
This is likely a temporary arrangement, which means Sac. State would also pay an exit fee at some point.
We Will never know because the other Indiana team was omittedOne team in Indiana won the National Championship this year.. and it wasn't ND
That lawsuit was the only smart move UConn has made. If we hadn't sued the ACC, we would have won 4 fewer National Championships in men's basketball and 7 fewer in women's basketball, and we would be UMass.
In case you haven't noticed, virtually every antitrust lawsuit is a winner. UConn should have sued a lot more.
It’s also the reason we aren’t in the ACC.
Not sure that is necessarily true, given that Pittsburgh was a part of the lawsuit and are now a part of the ACC.It’s also the reason we aren’t in the ACC.
It also strongly advocates for Stanford, as noted above. If ND ever joins the Big Ten, Stanford will be its +1.Notre Dame advocates for Notre Dame.