Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell. | Page 1008 | The Boneyard

Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell.

Current SEC teams could be spread over 2 divisions or say 4 divisions.
2 divisions - SEC teams would get 2 to 4 teams in the CFP. Too limited
4 divisions - SEC teams could get 4 to 8 teams in the CFP. This would essentially destroy the SEC though and eliminate a ton of conference games
Neither scenario would fly with the SEC. Imagine Auburn and Oklahoma getting relegated
At a certain point the national level grievances are going to go to the conference level, right? SEC takes whoever they want, B1G takes whoever they want. Big12/ACC take the wreckage and cannibalize each other. Now you have 3 conferences with like 25 teams. But you've only got a 12 playoff spots. Well how do you determine who wins a conference with that many teams when you can only really play a third of the other teams in the conference in a year. Suddenly you have conference committees to determine who should be going to the CFP and everyone loses their mind over that instead of everyone losing their mind at the CFP committee we have right now. The game is too big now. It can't be squeezed into the framework that the rest of NCAA sports fits into. If they keep trying, it's going to blow up and the lawsuits and fallout are going to crumble everything, not just football.
 
I'm not fully buying this. The information came from a WVU source. When a neutral (or fully ACC) source verifies it I'll believe it, until then I'll be a skeptic.
I believe it. WVU and Cinci would both prefer the ACC. Natural rivals with Pitt and VT. Ideally the Big XII could poach Cal and Stanford in return and conferences could be a bit more sane. An SMU for UCF trade would also make sense.
 
I believe it. WVU and Cinci would both prefer the ACC. Natural rivals with Pitt and VT. Ideally the Big XII could poach Cal and Stanford in return and conferences could be a bit more sane. An SMU for UCF trade would also make sense.
The ACC and B12 would be smart to declare a truce and make some trades. I don’t think it’s unlikely. It’s all about Fox - ESPN and whomever else has media money. I think just think UNC or ND need to make the first move before that discussion can happen.
 
I believe it. WVU and Cinci would both prefer the ACC. Natural rivals with Pitt and VT. Ideally the Big XII could poach Cal and Stanford in return and conferences could be a bit more sane. An SMU for UCF trade would also make sense.
The economics of a trade don't work for the ACC. The ACCN can't lose California and Texas for Florida (already there) and West Virginia and Ohio. And, Cal/Stanford/SMU are all getting either reduced payouts and WVU/Cincy/UCF are going to accept less than they are making in the Big 12?

If the ACC is raided, I think it makes more sense for Pitt and Louisville to go to the Big 12 with a couple other ACC schools.
 
I'm sure they would. I'm also very confident that we would prefer the ACC to our current situation. That doesn't mean anyone has been contacted.


This is why winning is so brutally important. When these things come to pass they need to be looking at our populated and well located market, two blue blood basketball programs AND a solid football program. The first two things don't matter if we can't show a solid football foundation. If we are good in football, even ranked around 20-25, we should become a shoe-in that is sought after. We always say it, but it really feels like an awful lot is riding on us finally breaking through for good. Our schedule this season could really set us up for success and momentum heading into the future.
 
This is why winning is so brutally important. When these things come to pass they need to be looking at our populated and well located market, two blue blood basketball programs AND a solid football program. The first two things don't matter if we can't show a solid football foundation. If we are good in football, even ranked around 20-25, we should become a shoe-in that is sought after. We always say it, but it really feels like an awful lot is riding on us finally breaking through for good. Our schedule this season could really set us up for success and momentum heading into the future.
I agree with this with the caveat that one can never predict the outcome of a season with confidence. I think the combination of good coaching and solid team gives us a chance to have a good season but I expected maybe 7-5 last year. And honestly 6-6 or 7-5 in 2023. Hoped to be 5-7 in Mora’s 1st year but expected 4-8. But I agree that a consistent good record is very important. Getting ranked would be a huge boost, too as would winning 10 games.
 
Someone posted last year that it's because those CEO's graduated from Ivy League schools.
But it's more than that. The founder of FedEx went to Yale. We just don't have the same state pride in the Northeast as other regions. The millionaire/billionaire Connecticut residents that went to Ivy League (or other non-sports focused schools) should support UConn athletics as a state pride / professional-like option. But they don't.

It's not just UConn. Rutgers and UMass aren't pulling from the millionaire/billionaire NJ/Mass residents. Rutgers doesn't even get big donations from its billionaire alums. Home Depot founder Bernard Marcus gives nothing to Rutgers.
 
The independent noose is tightening…



-> SEC teams are required to schedule at least one additional high quality non-conference from the Atlantic Coast, Big Ten or Big 12 conferences or Notre Dame each season. The SEC will continue to evaluate its policies to ensure the continued scheduling of high-quality non-conference opponents. <-

 
The ACC will have to add one football member to get to 9 games.
True, but I would think the ACC would take the Memphis offer that they made to the Big 12. That said, I don't think the ACC is adding anyone until after 2030/2031 when the exit fee declines.
 
Home Depot founder Bernard Marcus gives nothing to Rutgers
Well, the more important question is, would he be willing to give something to us?
 
Last edited:

Online statistics

Members online
221
Guests online
1,406
Total visitors
1,627

Forum statistics

Threads
164,035
Messages
4,379,600
Members
10,173
Latest member
mangers


.
..
Top Bottom