- Joined
- Sep 16, 2011
- Messages
- 54,276
- Reaction Score
- 202,295
And they'll be in the same position again looking for a conference.Cal and Stanford will be getting full shares before the Contract ends per that article. It would be a gradual increase.
And they'll be in the same position again looking for a conference.Cal and Stanford will be getting full shares before the Contract ends per that article. It would be a gradual increase.
and yet they’ve made the determination it’s worth it and then see what happens in 2036. It buys them 10 years rather than staying with the alternative.And they'll be in the same position again looking for a conference.
That conference is going to look like what the Pac 12 looks like now before 2036. Well not that bad but they'll be flying across the country to play the scraps.:
and yet they’ve made the determination it’s worth it and then see what happens in 2036. It buys them 10 years rather than staying with the alternative.
What yearThat conference is going to look like what the Pac 12 looks like now before 2036. Well not that bad but they'll be flying across the country to play the scraps.
I’d take those scraps right now over independent footballThat conference is going to look like what the Pac 12 looks like now before 2036. Well not that bad but they'll be flying across the country to play the scraps.
I was just having this conversation with two friends of mine who are big UConn fans. One thinks we should stay in the Big East and the Big 12 snub was for the best. My other friend thinks the Big 12 was the right move and works higher up in ESPN legal. Not sure how high but I had to laugh really loud when I said that her company, along with Fox, are playing large roles in shaping these conferences,and her response that she absolutely disagrees. She said that she has seen nothing that supported that. I wanted to nicely say that I have a feeling that info was above her pay grade, but I let the conversation go.Lol, the ACC wants who whom ever ESPN says that they will give them additional income for. As the Boston College AD said "ESPN told us what to do."
@aburks41 got this exactly right.
Very interesting...
I don't think ESPN is blackballing us per se, I just think they don't give a damn about this one way or the other, some thing that we should reciprocate the next time they come at me and asking for a tax break from the state.I was just having this conversation with two friends of mine who are big UConn fans. One thinks we should stay in the Big East and the Big 12 snub was for the best. My other friend thinks the Big 12 was the right move and works higher up in ESPN legal. Not sure how high but I had to laugh really loud when I said that her company, along with Fox, are playing large roles in shaping these conferences,and her response that she absolutely disagrees. She said that she has seen nothing that supported that. I wanted to nicely say that I have a feeling that info was above her pay grade, but I let the conversation go.
The networks totally control what happens and ESPN has been blackballing UConn from the ACC since the beginning and is letting SMU in instead. Unreal.
UConn has more to offer than SMU. It is not an ACC school. It is Wake Forest,I don't think ESPN is blackballing us per se, I just think they don't give a damn about this one way or the other, some thing that we should reciprocate the next time they come at me and asking for a tax break from the state.
How many times has UConn come up empty down on the CR goal line. At some point you have to ask is it bad luck or incompetence. There are a ton of favorables yet we can’t close the deal. I have zero faith the Admin has any plan or is any more adept than the clown parade that preceded them.Umm. We might have to wait and see WHAT THEY decide to do before we take shots at our administration for not doing anything.
I do wonder why if Apple wants in the game so badly, they don't work with those 4 to cherry pick teams into a FB only conference, while making it financially viable to select teams to walk away from the AAC, MWC, etc.
We have a very good AD at this point. This is about linear media companies that don't see the need to pay for UConn (i.e., as long as Fox can get them on the cheap and ESPN feels they have the CT market already covered). Ultimately streaming will separate the wheat from the chaff. This is when UConn's true value vs many P4 schools will become undeniable. DB has got all of our major programs pointing in the right direction. The Govenor, the UConn administration and the AD are all in sync. If we can continue to build on our recent success in football, we should be well positioned for the next round of realignment. Note: That said, I can definitely see football forming its own "conferences" long term.How many times has UConn come up empty down on the CR goal line. At some point you have to ask is it bad luck or incompetence. There are a ton of favorables yet we can’t close the deal. I have zero faith the Admin has any plan or is any more adept than the clown parade that preceded them.
You realize the Big XII is in, checks notes, Arizona correct?Not joining the ACC is a blessing in disguise. It's not but when the the top schools leave do you really want to be in a conference that has teams in CA. SMU really? The Big 12 is a much better conference and maybe uconn knows they are next in line when/if they move east. Maybe UConn has no interest in the ACC and giving them back all this money and by the time they get profitable the conference is going to be gutted.
Arizona is closer than CA. Also on mountain time not pacific time. It is much better conference than the ACC.You realize the Big XII is in, checks notes, Arizona correct?
I was just having this conversation with two friends of mine who are big UConn fans. One thinks we should stay in the Big East and the Big 12 snub was for the best. My other friend thinks the Big 12 was the right move and works higher up in ESPN legal. Not sure how high but I had to laugh really loud when I said that her company, along with Fox, are playing large roles in shaping these conferences,and her response that she absolutely disagrees. She said that she has seen nothing that supported that. I wanted to nicely say that I have a feeling that info was above her pay grade, but I let the conversation go.
The networks totally control what happens and ESPN has been blackballing UConn from the ACC since the beginning and is letting SMU in instead. Unreal.
Arizona is closer than CA. Also on mountain time not pacific time. It is much better conference than the ACC.
Definitely, if that "local" school is the state university and they are going to ask the state for a handout later on.ESPN is a business that has its headquarters in Connecticut. That's all it is. Why should they help local schools?
They should. The problem is of course that they don't occupy the same niche as ESPN does in terms of broadcasting the vast majority of college games, and, perhaps more relevantly, single-handedly reshaping the college conference landscape to their liking, including eviscerating the Big East, which was the University of Connecticut home.Why is no one lobbying NBC who also has its sports headquarters in Connecticut to help get UConn into the B1G or to schedule a game with ND?
Because this is the BY. From what I heard, ESPN was good with $$ for UConn to BIG12 but Fox was the hold-up (this is post post-last ditch effort once BIG12 go their "dream teams") not willing to dish it, and why would they since they have UConn's most valuable assets for a bargain?ESPN is a business that has its headquarters in Connecticut. That's all it is. Why should they help local schools? Why is no one lobbying NBC who also has its sports headquarters in Connecticut to help get UConn into the B1G or to schedule a game with ND?
I’d point out that we had our foot in the door. And the door was just shut on it anyway.Its about getting your foot in the door. People can talk about the ACC getting picked apart in 11-12 years (or I guess sooner if a school comes up with hundreds of millions of dollars I suppose). But in the end our best hope from a football standpoint is the ACC anyway and the whole waiting until the ACC GOR is over isn't a great idea because we may not even survive independence for another 11-12 years.
Lets say we get 10 mil. What is that, an extra $5 mil per year? So lets say we throw that toward essentially paying off the exit fee over a 6 year period. Perhaps if Mora is in a real football league we are competing for some of that bowl incentive money to also help offset the exit fee. In the ACC our attendance goes up for football, more ticket revenue. And on and on.
I don't love the idea of begging but we are in a tough spot. Of course if one doesn't give a damn about the football program, it's definitely not worth it I suppose.
Ct taxpayers are financing the ACC via ESPN tax breaks.ESPN is a business that has its headquarters in Connecticut. That's all it is. Why should they help local schools? Why is no one lobbying NBC who also has its sports headquarters in Connecticut to help get UConn into the B1G or to schedule a game with ND?
If that was truly the case, why not offer to pay the difference from our payout to cover the Fox portion? Surely that would've been preferable to our current position and gotten us into that coveted power conference spot.Because this is the BY. From what I heard, ESPN was good with $$ for UConn to BIG12 but Fox was the hold-up (this is post post-last ditch effort once BIG12 go their "dream teams") not willing to dish it, and why would they since they have UConn's most valuable assets for a bargain?