- Joined
- Aug 13, 2013
- Messages
- 9,079
- Reaction Score
- 8,792
Keep in mind the Title IX implications so whatever additional $$$ you were expecting to spend to be competitive; double it.
Only the Big Ten and SEC could afford to pull it off.
Keep in mind the Title IX implications so whatever additional $$$ you were expecting to spend to be competitive; double it.
You guys hit the jackpot for sure!Money really does matter. Look at Rutgers. They are having their best year in school history across all sports. Their second best year across all sports? Last year.
Oh no, that means our "budget shortfall" will increase. Oh the humanity.UConn will get in on this. Even if it means cutting another men's sport to add the full complement of scholarships for hockey, baseball, and soccer.
The unlimited number of coaches applies to all sports not just footballDon't really see how this impacts parity in college basketball.
Everything old is new again. That's how the local LL champs kept their "Dynasty" going back in the day.What's to stop Squid from hiring the parents of all the top 10 kids as coaches?
Most of us doCan I put ESPN on ignore?

Don’t lose any sleep. They will destroy themselves and the games eventuallyAs if it isn't bad enough now, I have this vision that the next version of a governing body will be like the foxes guarding the hen house. The whole college athletics landscape is becoming very disheartening.
Sounds like being in the Big XII with Texas and Oklahoma.The problem is that even if the P5 schools were to break away and form an autonomous organization, and invite UConn, we would have virtually no say in the governance. Not a great position to be in. The only thing worse, though, would be being left behind.