My sense is he has a pretty good finger on the pulse of what this fanbase banters around - either firsthand or shared.
Just type “Horsebarn” in the search bar above.
No doubt, thus the fact that he chose the site of the three possible on campus that is the most problematic is interesting. It could be that he randomly picked one of the three locations. It could be that the university has considered the Horsebarn Hill site as a tentative location for a new stadium. or, it could be that he chose the the most controversial site to support the notion that building on campus would be divisive.
I know that there's a whole lot of "tea leaf reading" going on in the previous paragraph, that's why I just indicated it was "interesting."
For what it's worth Dave does use red herrings from time to time. In one Twitter conversation, he indicated that the court at Gampel Pavilion could not be named "Hall of Fame Court" with the names and signatures of all the people associated with Connecticut basketball, who are members of the Naismith Hall of Fame on it because it is currently named "alumni court" and changing that would alienate all the schools alumni. Kind of a silly point.
I did end up watching the Zenetto video. Dave echo the point that we see posted here pretty frequently that being that unless and until we are selling out or close to selling out all our football games, trying to get a stadium on campus is logistically unlikely. I think that's right, but it's also a very intelligent point to make. If you are an advocate of keeping the stadium in East Hartford, well then go there and fill it up. If you are an advocate of building a new stadium on campus, well, go to East Hartford and fill up the Rent.
