Drew
Its a post, about nothing!
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2013
- Messages
- 7,954
- Reaction Score
- 28,905
My take is that they were going PAC 12 but still attempting one last swing at Big 12.
My take is that they were going PAC 12 but still attempting one last swing at Big 12.
Locking in my prediction:
Texas State > PAC
UTEP and NMSU > MW
UConn football only > PAC
Gonzaga basketball et al > PAC
UConn annual basketball game with Gonzaga plus one additional PAC game.
No or limited exit fee for us.
Done by Friday night.
My take is that they were going PAC 12 but still attempting one last swing at Big 12.
UTEP has been slowly shrinking in terms of brand/name recognition and the growth of Texas St and UTSA has not helped on that front.I may be changing my mind here on who I want in the PAC with us. Texas St has a bunch of positives, but I just really like UTEP. I wonder if separating them from NM State could be a problem? Maybe PAC gets UTEP, Texas St stays in the Sun Belt, Sac St moves up to join the MWC with NM St?
If you are referring to the MWC, I believe they get the 2-year grace period to get back to 8 programs. They should immediately go ahead and invite UConn and Gonzaga because the next full-time member would be sure to follow. Not that I would be very excited about joining the MWC in football. PAC, sure. Same situation. Strike while the iron is hot.I think this is absolutely shaping up for us to join as a football-only member. They just need to sign up the 8th school and work out whatever details they need to with Gonzaga.
This is a good point. In theory, UConn has two options. Could come down to money/exit fee.If you are referring to the MWC, I believe they get the 2-year grace period to get back to 8 programs. They should immediately go ahead and invite UConn and Gonzaga because the next full-time member would be sure to follow. Not that I would be very excited about joining the MWC in football. PAC, sure. Same situation. Strike while the iron is hot.
I believe that was only for the first 2 or 3 years after UConn joined the Big East. I'll try to find the documentation or maybe someone else has it.Question: Can UConn join a reformulated Pac-12 (or Pac-8, Pac-10) without violating its contract with the Big East? Under the terms of the 2019 deal, UConn agreed not to seek football membership in a Power Five conference. Even though a new Pac-12 would in practice function as a G5-type conference, can the Big East still interfere with the deal and demand large penalty fees because of the Pac-12 name and its legacy as a P-5?
There wouldn't be. The exit fee would apply if UConn withdraws from the Big East. Having football only join another conference wouldn't be considered a withdrawal. That's how I understand it.Why would there be an exit fee if fb found a home
Debated where to drop this but since it has AD Dave talking - this spot will do:
-> UConn Huskies' Strategic Moves in Conference Realignment: What Lies Ahead? The UConn Huskies, with their formidable basketball brand and prime media market position, are poised for significant shifts as conferences realign. Athletic Director David Benedict is steering the team towards both immediate success and future stability.
Explore how NIL and revenue sharing are transforming UConn's recruitment strategies, allowing them to compete with Power 5 schools, especially in football. The episode delves into UConn's brand evolution, highlighting their national recognition and competitive facilities. While an on-campus football stadium isn't on the horizon, the focus remains on leveraging Rentschler Field. Challenges in supporting non-revenue sports are addressed, with UConn's commitment to maintaining competitiveness across all sports.
Join us for an engaging discussion on UConn Huskies' path to success and the strategic decisions shaping their future. Listen now for exclusive insights and expert analysis. <-
Dang, no one ever attacks the MAC. Head is spinning right now!Damn, not the MAC!