Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell. | Page 898 | The Boneyard
.-.

Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell.

Coug,

Using that logic, one could claim that the best G level conference isn't far behind as the highest ranked group of five conference champion will also receive an auto bid.

The reality is that there is a large stratification between the B1G/SEC and the B-12/ACC and it will grow. It will be rare if in any season the B1G/SEC won't combine for six or seven participants in the CFP and it will be equally rare if in any season the B-12/ACC combine for more than three.
The gap between EPL and The Championship is much bigger than the gap between SEC/B1G and Big XII/ACC. The gap between Man City and the bottom half of the EPL is still bigger than the gap we're talking about.

It's more like saying B1G is EPL. SEC is La Liga. ACC is Bundesliga and Big XII is Serie A. Teams from any of those can win a Euro championship. The Pac was French Ligue 1 before it broke apart. MWC is maybe Eredivisie and American Conf is Liga Portugal. The Big East would be MLS because we aren't even eligible (not playing football).
 
Wondering if the following scenario has been pursued (or will be pursued): to maintain the Big East with UConn staying, Fox offers UConn a sizeable football tv deal that is conditioned on UConn remaining in the Big East for basketball?

IMG_4018.jpeg
 
But it is completely misinformed. Even if you only care about the Basketball Program (which is idiotic, but that is a separate issue), then you have to make the move to the B12. You can be disappointed that it has gotten to the point it has, that is fine. But saying "we don't need to make the change because we are have proven we can be successful in the Big East" is ignorant to what is going to happen to College Athletics in the next 5 years.

It is akin to the Blockbuster BOD laughing Netflix out to the boardroom in the year 2000 when they could have bought them for $50MM. Blockbuster laughed them out of the room as they thought "we own 90% of the movie rental business and own the industry. We don't need the online capabilities of Netflix as we can just dominate them out of the market". We all know how that turned out.

The entire landscape of college athletics is going change in over the next 5 years. If we do not make this B12 move now, then we will become irrelevant as an Athletic Department in 15 years. While we may not be excited that we have gotten tot his point, it is the reality and we must adjust or die. Let's not be arrogant and end up like Blockbuster! :)

Like so many aspects of our real life experiences,
Murphy is uninformed about the financial realities of college sports
If you look at the number of games last year that we lost by one or two scores, you can see how close we were to being right around 500 again. I am very hopeful that we can make a statement of sorts this season. Not confident, mind you, because there are so many unknowns, but hopeful.
Not to mention the BS call in game one vs NCST. We were right there and some officious bastard ref whistles us for a celebration foul? I saw far worse all season that went uncalled.. That was a terrible call that led to a late meltdown in our first game. Tough to come back from that!
 
.-.
Like so many aspects of our real life experiences,
Murphy is uninformed about the financial realities of college sports

Not to mention the BS call in game one vs NCST. We were right there and some officious bastard ref whistles us for a celebration foul? I saw far worse all season that went uncalled.. That was a terrible call that led to a late meltdown in our first game. Tough to come back from that!
The worst was Jackson Mitchell's "targeting" ejection in the game against Duke. It was clean tackle and if one would say that it was targeting, it certainly did not warrant ejection.
 
Like so many aspects of our real life experiences,
Murphy is uninformed about the financial realities of college sports

Not to mention the BS call in game one vs NCST. We were right there and some officious bastard ref whistles us for a celebration foul? I saw far worse all season that went uncalled.. That was a terrible call that led to a late meltdown in our first game. Tough to come back from that!
Three critical plays/calls that could have turned the season had they went our way. Loss of starting QB game 1 2 years running, One poster said we should be able to find another Marcus Campbell, Dan Orlovsky, Scott Lutrus etc

The examples of calls/plays, catastrophic injuries and the recruits show there is an element of luck necessary if you can’t overwhelm the opposition with resources. I’m confident in our talent level and coaching being good enough, I’d really like to have Lady Luck ride with us this year.

Maybe Yormark would be able to gather the B12 decision makers and say, see, I told you! Let’s take a vote.
 
The worst was Jackson Mitchell's "targeting" ejection in the game against Duke. It was clean tackle and if one would say that it was targeting, it certainly did not warrant ejection.

UConn's offense was the cause of the Duke loss...32 net yards in the first half...A 7-41 loss is not due to a targeting call.
 
The worst was Jackson Mitchell's "targeting" ejection in the game against Duke. It was clean tackle and if one would say that it was targeting, it certainly did not warrant ejection.
Yes would have made big difference if Michell stayed in the game. UConn offensive did not play well with him out of the game. Game very close at 41-7.
 
.-.
Three critical plays/calls that could have turned the season had they went our way. Loss of starting QB game 1 2 years running, One poster said we should be able to find another Marcus Campbell, Dan Orlovsky, Scott Lutrus etc

The examples of calls/plays, catastrophic injuries and the recruits show there is an element of luck necessary if you can’t overwhelm the opposition with resources. I’m confident in our talent level and coaching being good enough, I’d really like to have Lady Luck ride with us this year.

Maybe Yormark would be able to gather the B12 decision makers and say, see, I told you! Let’s take a vote.
UConn has two problems. No real star players. Maybe good G5 level team this year if players picked in the portal play well. But let’s be honest UConn just not have the talent level yet to hang with mid-level P4 schools
 
UConn has two problems. No real star players. Maybe good G5 level team this year if players picked in the portal play well. But let’s be honest UConn just not have the talent level yet to hang with mid-level P4 schools
Sorry UConn has no depth. So injuries big issue with UConn. This is common with lower level teams. Elite FBS are at least and at many positions three deep.
 
His tweet was so dumb it makes me wonder if one of his donors is a UConn basketball donor that wants to stay in the Big East and asked him to make a public statement about it
That was my opinion that last time he opened his mouth about wanting to stay in the Big East.
 
.-.
UConn's offense was the cause of the Duke loss...32 net yards in the first half...A 7-41 loss is not due to a targeting call.
I didn’t say Mitchel’s targeting ejection was the reason they lost to Duke. I was responding to a post that mentioned bad calls by saying Mitchel’s targeting ejection was beyond egregious. No that Duke game, Duke could have won that game 77-0; if they really wanted to.
 
.-.
UConn is not in the NYC DMA
Let’s try it again in this thread…Thank you @huskymedic

AND not including the portion of CT which again is in the NYC DMA, the New Haven-Hartford DMA is #34. If you add in the CT Fairfield County DMA the total footprint of the CT DMA would rank 21/22 in the country. Note, this does not include the Springfield DMA which would place the total combined DMA in the US Top 20.

So in summary, the UConn DMA footprint is a 19-22 market in the US And an affluent one at that, which brings additional benefits. For the trolls reading this, We are not the tiny state you see on a map.

I am sure this was discussed by the B12 advisory firm. By my estimate this market would rank somewhere from 4-6 in the B12. The number of eyeballs just on MBB and WBB would be huge. There’s DMAs and there’s eyeballs. Take Rutgers for example, their value is not in eyeballs, it’s in carriage fees. Advertisers pay more for eyeballs.

EDIT: This is just one example of why the WBB haters don‘t understand the value UConn WBB brings as a local and more importantly national brand. Their games bring eyeballs, lots of them, which advertisers will pay for. The pull from WBB is growing and live events are a big money maker. Yormark gets it.
 
Last edited:

Online statistics

Members online
289
Guests online
2,946
Total visitors
3,235

Forum statistics

Threads
166,477
Messages
4,480,717
Members
10,356
Latest member
wynela


Top Bottom