Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell. | Page 880 | The Boneyard

Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell.

Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
12,588
Reaction Score
20,351
In the current cable bundled channel world, UNC and UVA are more valuable than $60 million. Why? The price for the BTN or SECN in an in-market state is ~$1.50 per subscriber. North Carolina probably has ~3 million cable subscribers so $1.50 x 3 million x 12 months = $54 million. Virginia is a little bit less due to a smaller number of cable subscribers. And, that is just for the conference network. So, UNC and UVA can be positive adds to either the Big 10 or SEC.
Oh hog wash. They are not worth $67 million to the Big. And the Big doesn’t need 2 more mid-level football teams. And the days of the cable bundles are fast dwindling. And both share the markets with others. UNC with Duke, NC State, UVA with VATECH. And is in a pro market anyway. If the big money was cable fees, the ACC would be wealthy.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
12,588
Reaction Score
20,351
Paul Finebaum: North Carolina is at the top of SEC's priority list if it further expands

The SEC doesn’t seem at all interested in any further expansion with the league now at 16 teams. Even so, if they were, Paul Finebaum knows the school that would be their next prime candidate in realignment.

Still, if the SEC were to add a new member, Finebaum says what he has heard is that the obvious pick would be North Carolina. The only question would be if the Tar Heels would join on their own or if at least one more team came along with them to make it an even number at 18.

“It’s North Carolina at the top,” Finebaum stated. “I think, after that, it’s a little bit unknown. There’s a million different theories. Would North Carolina take someone with them? Or would they just sit around?”

“The one thing I feel pretty confident of, though, is that, if something happens in the next couple weeks, it won’t be Florida State going to the SEC. I mean it just seems like they have shot themselves in the foot on that,” explained Finebaum. “I don’t think Clemson is in as bad of shape but they are now lumped with Florida State.”

UNC is at that top of their list if they expand which they don’t plan to do and if the prioritize basketball which they won’t and if every team is willing to take a pay cut to add them which they won’t. Sort of like being 12th in line for the British throne I guess. Better than being 13th.
 
Joined
Mar 19, 2013
Messages
2,494
Reaction Score
4,805
A reporter from the New York times had this idea a few years ago. Not sure it makes sense.
Never hurts to ask. Football should be included. Great rilvalry with Vandy in football. Kentucky Alabama Arkansas Florida and Texas in basketball. Lots of eyes in the northeast would watch with great marketing.
 
Joined
Jan 21, 2016
Messages
2,062
Reaction Score
4,411
Never hurts to ask. Football should be included. Great rilvalry with Vandy in football. Kentucky Alabama Arkansas Florida and Texas in basketball. Lots of eyes in the northeast would watch with great marketing.
It would make more sense if the SEC also took UVA and UNC as well as maybe Duke.
 

Exit 4

This space for rent
Joined
Feb 3, 2012
Messages
10,503
Reaction Score
38,815

This is a must listen.

Two biggest talking points: i) FSU/Clemson only end up in the SEC/B1G if the ACC is fully ripped apart and in that scenario the SEC/B1G would probably pick different schools and ii) FSU/Clemson have damaged their brand with their legal tactics. SEC/B1G Presidents have serious reservations about working with schools who are this disruptive.

Furthermore, it seems the B1G/SEC want to digest their current expansion and it seems they have been advised that there is no $ from ESPN or Fox for such an expansion (at a $ level that is additive).

FSU/Clemson will talk to the B12, but McMurphy says the two really don't want to go there. And the B12 scenario would be challenging to make financial sense given the exit fees.

McMurphy says the SEC wants UNC and UVA or VA Tech as they want new states (duh!). He doesn't offer a opinion as to who the B1G wants.

Conclusion; FSU/Clemson are stuck and now they are politically damaged goods as well (which might have repercussions at the end of the ACC GOR).

FSU has clearly failed to read the room on CRA tactics.
 
Joined
Sep 19, 2018
Messages
7,514
Reaction Score
28,089
FSU and Clemson overplayed their hand. No idea what they were thinking. Maybe they thought they'd get out of this cleanly and there would be an $EC or B1G invite waiting in the wings. Like someone else said you don't quit your job until you've got another one lined up.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
4,245
Reaction Score
10,878
This is a must listen.

Two biggest talking points: i) FSU/Clemson only end up in the SEC/B1G if the ACC is fully ripped apart and in that scenario the SEC/B1G would probably pick different schools and ii) FSU/Clemson have damaged their brand with their legal tactics. SEC/B1G Presidents have serious reservations about working with schools who are this disruptive.

Furthermore, it seems the B1G/SEC want to digest their current expansion and it seems they have been advised that there is no $ from ESPN or Fox for such an expansion (at a $ level that is additive).

FSU/Clemson will talk to the B12, but McMurphy says the two really don't want to go there. And the B12 scenario would be challenging to make financial sense given the exit fees.

McMurphy says the SEC wants UNC and UVA or VA Tech as they want new states (duh!). He doesn't offer a opinion as to who the B1G wants.

Conclusion; FSU/Clemson are stuck and now they are politically damaged goods as well (which might have repercussions at the end of the ACC GOR).

FSU has clearly failed to read the room on CRA tactics.

Oh god I hope this is accurate. The level of arrogance and incompetence at FSU and Clemson would be historic.....

We can only hope.....
 
Joined
Sep 14, 2015
Messages
1,172
Reaction Score
3,689
Oh, be still my heart!!!

UNC and Virginia leave and FSU and Clemson get stuck in a watered down ACC. Watching that might be better than sex.....
Could be a SNL skit to rival Zillowporn
 
Joined
Aug 4, 2016
Messages
1,312
Reaction Score
1,774
Other than the lawsuits involved, this kind of reminds me of both Missouri and San Diego State............

When the B1G announced they were going to add a 12th team back in 2009, Missouri assumed it was them. Everyone at Missouri talked about how they were leaving the Big 12 and the new Longhorn Network and going to the B1G! Then, the B1G invited Nebraska and Mizzou had egg on their face. At least the SEC came calling a year later.

And then last year, San Diego State announced they were leaving the Mountain West only to come crawling back because the PAC-12 blew up.
 
Joined
Sep 18, 2011
Messages
5,131
Reaction Score
20,354
Oh hog wash. They are not worth $67 million to the Big. And the Big doesn’t need 2 more mid-level football teams. And the days of the cable bundles are fast dwindling. And both share the markets with others. UNC with Duke, NC State, UVA with VATECH. And is in a pro market anyway. If the big money was cable fees, the ACC would be wealthy.
In North Carolina, you have 4 ACC schools so the ACCN fees are from 4 schools. Imagine if the ACCN fees were from one school?

And, why do you think SMU and Cal/Stanford were grabbed by the ACC? They took a reduced rate but they opened up Texas and California to in-market fees for the ACCN. Thus, they were accretive adds.
 
Joined
Aug 31, 2014
Messages
996
Reaction Score
3,785
This is a must listen.

Two biggest talking points: i) FSU/Clemson only end up in the SEC/B1G if the ACC is fully ripped apart and in that scenario the SEC/B1G would probably pick different schools and ii) FSU/Clemson have damaged their brand with their legal tactics. SEC/B1G Presidents have serious reservations about working with schools who are this disruptive.

Furthermore, it seems the B1G/SEC want to digest their current expansion and it seems they have been advised that there is no $ from ESPN or Fox for such an expansion (at a $ level that is additive).

FSU/Clemson will talk to the B12, but McMurphy says the two really don't want to go there. And the B12 scenario would be challenging to make financial sense given the exit fees.

McMurphy says the SEC wants UNC and UVA or VA Tech as they want new states (duh!). He doesn't offer a opinion as to who the B1G wants.

Conclusion; FSU/Clemson are stuck and now they are politically damaged goods as well (which might have repercussions at the end of the ACC GOR).

FSU has clearly failed to read the room on CRA tactics.

The BIG12 sounds like a strong brand, and with all the new additions being brought over kicking and screaming, they don't want to go. They have a bright future ahead of them.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2022
Messages
393
Reaction Score
1,465
The BIG12 sounds like a strong brand, and with all the new additions being brought over kicking and screaming, they don't want to go. They have a bright future ahead of them.
The truth is that a bunch of this is survival, smoke and mirrors stuff from the Big12 who just lost 2 behemoth football powers they will never replace both in interest/history and value. Yormark is building from a place of devastation, credit to him.
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
58,111
Reaction Score
214,977
In North Carolina, you have 4 ACC schools so the ACCN fees are from 4 schools. Imagine if the ACCN fees were from one school?

And, why do you think SMU and Cal/Stanford were grabbed by the ACC? They took a reduced rate but they opened up Texas and California to in-market fees for the ACCN. Thus, they were accretive adds.
Does the ACC actually own the ACCN? If not, why would they care about whether That Work gets in market fees?
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2011
Messages
5,649
Reaction Score
13,766
Anyone here that still thinks the Big 12 will be a lateral move with Clemson and FSU joining is 100% out to lunch.

The ACC would effectively begin to disintegrate.

The thing is all the FSU/Clem to the Big 12 stuff last week turned out to be speculative hogwash.
That’s a huge if
The B1G and the SEC allowing an effective challenge to their P2 seems like a strategic error when they’re holding all the cards to enable them to prevent it.
They have the ability to both kill the ACC and ensure that the big 12 is no threat to their supremacy.
 

KryHavok

Oh yes, UConn IS a BB blueblood!
Joined
Aug 25, 2023
Messages
429
Reaction Score
1,416
That’s a huge if
The B1G and the SEC allowing an effective challenge to their P2 seems like a strategic error when they’re holding all the cards to enable them to prevent it.
They have the ability to both kill the ACC and ensure that the big 12 is no threat to their supremacy.
I think it comes to possibility versus probability. It is possible that the B12 challenges the P2...yeah. Is it probable that the B12 can challenge the P2, likely no. The realignment and money movement would be from B12 to P2, not the other way around. So yes, the B12 may be getting stronger if they can add some ACC teams, but dynamically the P2 are so far ahead as to make competition with them moot.
 
Joined
Sep 18, 2011
Messages
5,131
Reaction Score
20,354
Does the ACC actually own the ACCN? If not, why would they care about whether That Work gets in market fees?
It is a joint revenue share. The ACCN probably brings in $10 million per year for each ACC school and it has been growing over time. With the addition of SMU/Cal/Stanford, the ACCN revenues will take a step up and with SMU/Cal/Stanford taking reduced shares, the rest of the ACC schools will see a step up in revenues. The difference between an in-market ACCN cable subscriber and out-of-market subscriber is ~$1+/month. Of course, cord cutting will take a toll on subscribers in the future.
 

Online statistics

Members online
183
Guests online
1,639
Total visitors
1,822

Forum statistics

Threads
158,106
Messages
4,135,073
Members
10,017
Latest member
jackruy1


Top Bottom