Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell. | Page 792 | The Boneyard

Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell.

c29328

On Smoko
Joined
Jul 8, 2013
Messages
212
Reaction Score
1,011
ACC will not add UConn. They listed 10 or so possible candidates for expansion before adding the 3 Sucksateers and UConn isn’t even on their radar.

Only positive scenario for UConn is a total ACC implosion that results in essentially a reformation of the 2003 Big East Conference
Maybe. the sooner the "Super conference" comes together, the better. The teams not in those two top level conferences can re-engineer B league college football and start playing regionally again. UConn won't be in that club but I think there is potential for a pretty robust B league over time. Some really good programs are going to get left out.
 

Dream Jobbed 2.0

“Most definitely”
Joined
May 3, 2016
Messages
14,978
Reaction Score
56,390
Maybe. the sooner the "Super conference" comes together, the better. The teams not in those two top level conferences can re-engineer B league college football and start playing regionally again. UConn won't be in that club but I think there is potential for a pretty robust B league over time. Some really good programs are going to get left out.
And our days of playing in March Madness are over
 

c29328

On Smoko
Joined
Jul 8, 2013
Messages
212
Reaction Score
1,011
And our days of playing in March Madness are over
Maybe. It's out of our control either way. Sports landscape is moving on without the mid tier football guys. It's done. It's been done for years. As far as march madness, my bet is they will still be pulling 32 teams or so at large for hoops. Who knows though.
 

Waquoit

Mr. Positive
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
33,284
Reaction Score
87,027
ESPN not having a guarantee to extend the deal past 2027 is HUGE. That is FSU's out right there.
I was thinking exactly that. Good enough for a Florida court anyway.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
90,685
Reaction Score
345,123
Everything else aside, how the F#$% is it possible that a signatory party to a legally binding agreement is not allowed to have an executed copy of said agreement?
Are they a signatory party though? Isn't the legally binding agreement between ESPN and the ACC and not the ACC members et al?
 

Chin Diesel

Power of Love
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
33,117
Reaction Score
102,425
Again, FSU does not want to be partners with ESPN. ESPN = SEC. These two are HUGE financial partners.

ESPN podcasts, Thamel, Herbstreit etc are mostly schills for their corporate bosses. ESPN also partners with ACC. They don't want their cash cow (FSU) to leave. What you're doing here is akin to getting your political news from the

The discovery process with ACC & ESPN will be very interesting.

At some point this is what it boils down to for ESPN. If they can't keep FSU, and a few others in the ACC, ESPN would want them in the SEC which ESPN also controls. Losing them to the B1G means losing them to FOX.
 
Joined
Feb 24, 2019
Messages
1,070
Reaction Score
5,595
Right. It’s not like the B1G doesn’t benefit massive from its research partnership. And plenty of other schools use sports to raise money for their endowments. And when I say sports it really just means football.

Seriously, just stop talking.
I don't know how to tell you this, but you don't know what you're talking about. Endowments were a thing long before big time athletics were a thing and grew long before big time football became a thing. The B1G research partnership also has nothing to do with athletics, they just pool academic resources to be more competitive.

I suggest you take your own advice and stop tapking
 
Joined
Nov 12, 2021
Messages
173
Reaction Score
1,458
I know there are financial considerations, but after reading all the legal filings and statements today, I simply don't understand how there are any UConn fans who would willingly advocate for us to be associated at all with the ACC and its toxic brand and institutions.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
22,040
Reaction Score
53,582
You have a vowel misplaced there genius....You don't think a highly paid employee speaks for the best financial interests of his employer? He certainly carries the water for ESPN & their partner the SEC.
Herbstreit would be a highly prized hire at any network. He has no reason to cowtow to corporate. And part of his reputation rests on speaking honestly without bias.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
27,138
Reaction Score
35,622
I don't know how to tell you this, but you don't know what you're talking about. Endowments were a thing long before big time athletics were a thing and grew long before big time football became a thing. The B1G research partnership also has nothing to do with athletics, they just pool academic resources to be more competitive.

I suggest you take your own advice and stop tapking

So you’re denying that schools use football to fundraise? Having an FBS program is a big part of a University’s public profile.

Even for the Ivies football is big for Alums and fundraising.

Keep digging that hole.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
27,138
Reaction Score
35,622
At some point this is what it boils down to for ESPN. If they can't keep FSU, and a few others in the ACC, ESPN would want them in the SEC which ESPN also controls. Losing them to the B1G means losing them to FOX.

Why would ESPN pay FSU three times as much in the SEC when they are paying them about a third in the ACC?
 

FfldCntyFan

Texas: Property of UConn Men's Basketball program
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
12,973
Reaction Score
45,731
Are they a signatory party though? Isn't the legally binding agreement between ESPN and the ACC and not the ACC members et al?
Perhaps I misread it but I thought it stated that the Grant of Rights agreement is what the attorneys couldn't copy. That agreement is between the member schools and the ACC. The media deal is between the ACC and ESPN.
 

Online statistics

Members online
339
Guests online
1,963
Total visitors
2,302

Forum statistics

Threads
158,723
Messages
4,165,937
Members
10,037
Latest member
jfreeds


.
Top Bottom