- Joined
- Jan 21, 2016
- Messages
- 2,206
- Reaction Score
- 4,944
Maybe UConn can clean up its football program and be in some more bowl games over the next few years before a few teams leave the ACC
Yes, they have the right to - but it does not mean they will. That means the GoR only exists, as of now, through 2027.
The grant of rights was given by FSU to the ACC, not to ESPN. So one would think that the ACC will retain the rights whether or not ESPN chooses to extend the existing contract. It would seem to make the question of valuing the damages after 2027 considerably more difficult.Yes, they have the right to - but it does not mean they will. That means the GoR only exists, as of now, through 2027.
And their ten years of actions were to screw UConn with every one of them.So 10 years of actions are the problem? When did they sign the GOR? About 10 years ago? Why keep agreeing to extend the contract?
UConn will not be in power conference. It’s clear that the breakaway will be a P2 of 32-40. Once they can find a way to drop Rutgers and Vandy it’ll be even easier. In a way that’s the best outcome for us.The grant of rights was given by FSU to the ACC, not to ESPN. So one would think that the ACC will retain the rights whether or not ESPN chooses to extend the existing contract. It would seem to make the question of valuing the damages after 2027 considerably more difficult.
The unenforceable penalty argument is intriguing. Basically they're saying that since the GOR is out of proportion to the actual damages to the conference that it is legally unenforceable. If FSU prevails with that argument it is quite a bombshell to the status quo. It basically means it's open season four conference realignment.
Since we are screwed under the existing structure, anarchy is our friend, though, I'm not sure that existing P4 schools becoming more readily available really helps us.
FSU pounding on the door yelling "let us out!" Meanwhile, UConn is tapping on the window asking to be let in...Imagine if UConn had to raise that kind of sum!
Shrugs... best "possible" outcome anyway.UConn will not be in power conference. It’s clear that the breakaway will be a P2 of 32-40. Once they can find a way to drop Rutgers and Vandy it’ll be even easier. In a way that’s the best outcome for us.
So much for an "iron-clad" contract. All i's were not dotted and all t's were not crossed!
If a half dozen teams leave the ACC, UConn has very good chance of being a replacement. ACC will make basketball a priority,ACC will not add UConn. They listed 10 or so possible candidates for expansion before adding the 3 Sucksateers and UConn isn’t even on their radar.
Only positive scenario for UConn is a total ACC implosion that results in essentially a reformation of the 2003 Big East Conference
Correlation does not equal causationWith all due respect. The two are linked.
I'm pretty sure once FSU signed, the is and ts were includedSo much for an "iron-clad" contract. All i's were not dotted and all t's were not crossed!
Wouldn't this be against them? Part of their argument is that the ACC has failed their duty to adequately get the same rights money as the SEC and B1G and that they are stuck with the same rights fee till 2036. This kind of undermines that point until ESPN extends the dealESPN not having a guarantee to extend the deal past 2027 is HUGE. That is FSU's out right there.
ACC sued FSU YESTERDAY! in North Carolina! Says all matters pertaining to FSU and the ACC are under North Carolina jurisdiction. lol
ACC sues FSU Board of Trustees as legal battle with Board heightens
According to the court documents, the lawsuit was filed around 5:18 p.m. on Thursday.www.wctv.tv
Correlation does not equal causation