Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell. | Page 791 | The Boneyard

Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell.

Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
834
Reaction Score
2,245
ESPN says you can bitch all you want. You’re mine and you’re staying out of spite. You can send love letters to the Big and fox all you want but remember. You’re here forever.
 
Joined
May 27, 2014
Messages
3,157
Reaction Score
15,703
The grant of rights was given by FSU to the ACC, not to ESPN. So one would think that the ACC will retain the rights whether or not ESPN chooses to extend the existing contract. It would seem to make the question of valuing the damages after 2027 considerably more difficult.

The unenforceable penalty argument is intriguing. Basically they're saying that since the GOR is out of proportion to the actual damages to the conference that it is legally unenforceable. If FSU prevails with that argument it is quite a bombshell to the status quo. It basically means it's open season four conference realignment.

Since we are screwed under the existing structure, anarchy is our friend, though, I'm not sure that existing P4 schools becoming more readily available really helps us.
UConn will not be in power conference. It’s clear that the breakaway will be a P2 of 32-40. Once they can find a way to drop Rutgers and Vandy it’ll be even easier. In a way that’s the best outcome for us.
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
58,882
Reaction Score
218,790
UConn will not be in power conference. It’s clear that the breakaway will be a P2 of 32-40. Once they can find a way to drop Rutgers and Vandy it’ll be even easier. In a way that’s the best outcome for us.
Shrugs... best "possible" outcome anyway.
 

Dream Jobbed 2.0

“Most definitely”
Joined
May 3, 2016
Messages
14,978
Reaction Score
56,390
ACC will not add UConn. They listed 10 or so possible candidates for expansion before adding the 3 Sucksateers and UConn isn’t even on their radar.

Only positive scenario for UConn is a total ACC implosion that results in essentially a reformation of the 2003 Big East Conference
 
Joined
Jan 21, 2016
Messages
2,169
Reaction Score
4,787
ACC will not add UConn. They listed 10 or so possible candidates for expansion before adding the 3 Sucksateers and UConn isn’t even on their radar.

Only positive scenario for UConn is a total ACC implosion that results in essentially a reformation of the 2003 Big East Conference
If a half dozen teams leave the ACC, UConn has very good chance of being a replacement. ACC will make basketball a priority,
 
  • Like
Reactions: GG
Joined
Feb 24, 2019
Messages
1,070
Reaction Score
5,591
ESPN not having a guarantee to extend the deal past 2027 is HUGE. That is FSU's out right there.
Wouldn't this be against them? Part of their argument is that the ACC has failed their duty to adequately get the same rights money as the SEC and B1G and that they are stuck with the same rights fee till 2036. This kind of undermines that point until ESPN extends the deal
 
Joined
Jun 1, 2023
Messages
37
Reaction Score
148
More food for thought. The SEC is very lucrative. If they were some back channel letting them know that they were wanted at $100M a year then they would have already announced the departure. Because that move pays for itself.

It’s the ESPN College Gameday Pod with Pete Thamel.

I think this is the one.


Again, FSU does not want to be partners with ESPN. ESPN = SEC. These two are HUGE financial partners.

ESPN podcasts, Thamel, Herbstreit etc are mostly schills for their corporate bosses. ESPN also partners with ACC. They don't want their cash cow (FSU) to leave. What you're doing here is akin to getting your political news from the
ACC sued FSU YESTERDAY! in North Carolina! Says all matters pertaining to FSU and the ACC are under North Carolina jurisdiction. lol

The discovery process with ACC & ESPN will be very interesting.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
27,136
Reaction Score
35,616
Correlation does not equal causation

Right. It’s not like the B1G doesn’t benefit massive from its research partnership. And plenty of other schools use sports to raise money for their endowments. And when I say sports it really just means football.

Seriously, just stop talking.
 
Joined
Sep 19, 2018
Messages
7,523
Reaction Score
28,124
Everything else aside, how the F#$% is it possible that a signatory party to a legally binding agreement is not allowed to have an executed copy of said agreement?
Are they a signatory party though? Isn't the legally binding agreement between ESPN and the ACC and not the ACC members et al?
 

Drew

Its a post, about nothing!
Joined
Jun 19, 2013
Messages
7,935
Reaction Score
28,641


IMG_1723.jpeg
 

Online statistics

Members online
305
Guests online
1,728
Total visitors
2,033

Forum statistics

Threads
158,723
Messages
4,165,890
Members
10,037
Latest member
jfreeds


.
Top Bottom