- Joined
- Apr 11, 2014
- Messages
- 243
- Reaction Score
- 1,130
And saying "but i'm not getting dragged into this again" while getting dragged into it againLol at opening with a theatrical sigh about a bunch of people disagreeing with you on this.
And saying "but i'm not getting dragged into this again" while getting dragged into it againLol at opening with a theatrical sigh about a bunch of people disagreeing with you on this.
Here is my thing. UConn FB has 12 dates a year. UConn men and women’s hoops have 70 games a year.
Basketball is massively undervalued in current landscape Of college sports. They don’t get football ratings per game, but they get a lot of eyeballs in volume.
Especially the rising popularity and growth in the women’s game. I think men’s hoops will undergo a resurgence soon and the women’s sports have some of the most popular athletes in the United States. I would say hoops is a bargain for TV executives at this point.
Look at the inventory. It is undervalued. So many games are out there. You got to look at total volume of people.I don’t think basketball is that undervalued as far as tv goes. There are only a handful of non-March basketball games that even approach an average football game in viewership. It’s not really an additive thing. 10 100k watched games is not as valuable as 1 million viewers for a single game.
It’s the NCAA tournament however that is undervalued. Or at least the money is not distributed in a fair way to the schools. Until that puzzle is solved, basketball programs will get the short end of the stick compared to football.
I agree basketball inventory is undervalued, but the real revenue opportunity is to eliminate the cut the NCAA gets from the NCAA Tournament. And, the womens’s tournament is way undervalued and it will probably be sold on its own going forward.Look at the inventory. It is undervalued. So many games are out there. You got to look at total volume of people.
But again, 100k viewerships for ten times is not as valuable as 1-million viewers once. The larger audiences pull in more revenue per ads.Look at the inventory. It is undervalued. So many games are out there. You got to look at total volume of people.
Dude, none of that is obvious at all. We had a horrible stretch with three coaches. But we also jumped straight from FCS to BCS level FBS and won right away. Nobody has ever done that. We fixed the coaching. Football will be fine. We were once top 20 in the country in putting guys in the NFL. Ahead of many SEC and Big XII schools.I think you misinterpreted what I meant.
I love our football team. I would kill for UConn to go to the Big XII. But I’m not delusional. It’s painfully obvious that our supposed “in” as Colorado’s partner was a fantasy. And without a Big XII invite we’re not surviving long-term. The university just simply won’t choose to hemorrhage money forever.
If the NCAA used the CFP instead of March Madness to subsidize the rest of college athletics, we would be the most valuable brand in the country between the men’s and women’s program. I hate when people (generalizing here) say that CFB generates more money than NCAAB because that’s just patently false. CFB generates less revenue, but the conferences keep 100% of itI agree basketball inventory is undervalued, but the real revenue opportunity is to eliminate the cut the NCAA gets from the NCAA Tournament. And, the womens’s tournament is way undervalued and it will probably be sold on its own going forward.
If the NCAA used the CFP instead of March Madness to subsidize the rest of college athletics, we would be the most valuable brand in the country between the men’s and women’s program. I hate when people (generalizing here) say that CFB generates more money than NCAAB because that’s just patently false. CFB generates less revenue, but the conferences keep 100% of it
You have numbers for this?If the NCAA used the CFP instead of March Madness to subsidize the rest of college athletics, we would be the most valuable brand in the country between the men’s and women’s program. I hate when people (generalizing here) say that CFB generates more money than NCAAB because that’s just patently false. CFB generates less revenue, but the conferences keep 100% of it
Agree the gap in pay isn’t reflective of the gap in total advertising dollars. They are chasing scarcity. There aren’t enough big football games.Look at the inventory. It is undervalued. So many games are out there. You got to look at total volume of people.
The media stories seem to be trending far more positively toward UConn today.View attachment 90181Colorado doesn't change Big 12 basketball much. Unless it's just the first domino
The Buffaloes shouldn't impact the Big 12's reputation as the best conference in college basketball. But they do help stability.theathletic.com
I think Fox knows that UConn is worth far more than what they are paying for UConn in the BE and, more importantly, that our value is further strengthened by being in the Big12 with other brands/state schools that have larger fan bases than the BE schools. Probably why we heard months ago that both Fox and ESPN approve of UConn even though we're not currently in a P5 conference.My feelin, I don’t know why, is that Fox values UConn. They already have them with Big East.
If the queen had balls she'd be the king.If the NCAA used the CFP instead of March Madness to subsidize the rest of college athletics, we would be the most valuable brand in the country between the men’s and women’s program. I hate when people (generalizing here) say that CFB generates more money than NCAAB because that’s just patently false. CFB generates less revenue, but the conferences keep 100% of it
View attachment 90181Colorado doesn't change Big 12 basketball much. Unless it's just the first domino
The Buffaloes shouldn't impact the Big 12's reputation as the best conference in college basketball. But they do help stability.theathletic.com
Not in today’s world. Now she only has to think she has them.If the queen had balls she'd be the king.
This journalist may need an editor.UConn isn’t. Being used as a prop. These guys aren’t incredible negotiators who put pressure on. Everything we have see. Has been at face value. BY wants UCOnn. Big 12 fans, who have an inferiority complex with SEC, don’t.
I think the closer you are to BY, the more you are accepting of UConn.
As far as next scenario, Arizona is next target. If Arizona comes, they are 14 for obvious reasons. But, I think they need to bring Arizona State. I think UConn is either 14 or 16.
It’s above your pay grade.This is dumb.
Not in today’s world. Now she only has to think she has them.