- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 94,144
- Reaction Score
- 368,916
Called itNot sure what and CSU are doing. They shoulda been trying to peel off SMU to kill the AAC and establish MW as clear top G5/4.
Without AFA or a second Texas school, Navy will bolt.Frees up the AAC to add the big prizes out there — Wyoming and Rice.
Tough for Aresco to do a 180 on that and it's not like we are all that attractive right now anyway. In the end, ESPN went too low on their bargain pick up of the AAC's content. That contributes significantly to the AAC's lack of desirability.This ironically might open the door for us football-only even though I think we should remain independent.
If I'm the MWC right now.. I turn to getting the Texas wing I wanted. Invite SMU & Rice. SMU seeing the potential instability with Memphis potentially heading out the door may well accept because at this point the money is at best going to be even for the AAC and likely will be below the MWC.
The problem with that is that SMU has a $10 million exit fee. Unless, the MW is willing to pay it for them, I don't see them moving to a western league with less TV exposure and likely a similar TV deal.If I'm the MWC right now.. I turn to getting the Texas wing I wanted. Invite SMU & Rice. SMU seeing the potential instability with Memphis potentially heading out the door may well accept because at this point the money is at best going to be even for the AAC and likely will be below the MWC.
I don't get the love for UTSA. They have no brand nationally.Been saying from the start that the MW should be going after SMU. Helps FB & BB and further weakens the AAC.
If you want another TX school, go with UTSA.
Doesn't the exit fee disappear if enough schools leave the conference??The problem with that is that SMU has a $10 million exit fee. Unless, the MW is willing to pay it for them, I don't see them moving to a western league with less TV exposure and likely a similar TV deal.
I think only if the league dissolves.Doesn't the exit fee disappear if enough schools leave the conference??
UTSA has been D1 for 10 years. They at least have potential to grow.I don't get the love for UTSA. They have no brand nationally.
In terms of non-P5 schools in Texas, the brands go as follows:
7. SMU
8. Rice
9. UTEP
10. North Texas
11. UTSA
12. Texas State
The AAC doesn't have years to wait for potential: they have weeks to make a decision.UTSA has been D1 for 10 years. They at least have potential to grow.
The issue is whether you want to be on a sinking ship. If you're comfortable that you'll always find a landing spot then maybe it's ok. Otw, you might want to take a lifeboat when it's offered.Yeah I don't see SMU leaving the AAC. They are now one of the premier teams. They are going to get most of the TV slots in both main sports. It's Memphis, SMU and then ??
Yeah it'd be better to take a known quantity that stinks and will always stink like Rice.The AAC doesn't have years to wait for potential: they have weeks to make a decision.