Kadary Richmond Transferring | Page 12 | The Boneyard

Kadary Richmond Transferring

Personally only think we have room for one more guard and staff is prioritizing Locke. Cole, Sool, Gaff, Hawkins and Locke is a pretty solid backcourt IMO. Do others think we could/would take on Richmond+Locke?
 
lange10 said:
Personally only think we have room for one more guard and staff is prioritizing Locke. Cole, Sool, Gaff, Hawkins and Locke is a pretty solid backcourt IMO. Do others think we could/would take on Richmond+Locke?
Expand ...
Yes if if it happens you make it work
 
tzznandrew said:
He shot 36% this year. He upped his percentage 10 points. He can absolutely improve that another few percentage points. This isn't like Martin where his numbers over 3 years have been roughly flat.

Cole shot 38% from 3.

Those two are the equivalent of the 2nd and 3rd best shooters from Creighton. (Ballock & Mitchell)

Hawkins is coming in with a rep for shooting.

You'd obviously like there to be someone—or two—players up in the 40% range, but you can be a very good team with your third best shooter shooting at Gaffney's percentage.
Expand ...
Maybe. Gaffney averaged under 20 minutes a game so is that enough playing time to qualify someone as your #3 shooter?
 
.-.
Do we know -- either as fact or with good intuitive sourcing -- that we are "out of the running" for Richmond? Seems like a lot of supposition here?
 
seeya27 said:
Do we know -- either as fact or with good intuitive sourcing -- that we are "out of the running" for Richmond? Seems like a lot of supposition here?
Expand ...
It's all speculation, there hasn't been a ton out there in terms of who's he's zooming with or seriously considering. But we never seem to get that surprise out of nowhere commit, so I don't have my hopes up here
 
I can say definitively that KR is considering his options and those on his list, including UConn, are very much in, or out, of the running at this time. Got this from the Dam Buster himself................
 
lange10 said:
Personally only think we have room for one more guard and staff is prioritizing Locke. Cole, Sool, Gaff, Hawkins and Locke is a pretty solid backcourt IMO. Do others think we could/would take on Richmond+Locke?
Expand ...
out of the thousand+ guys in the portal arent richmond and locke the only 2 we've been legitimately linked with so far? el amin and brahma werent BE level. the fatts stuff was all supposition. am i forgetting anyone else?

anyways that's gotta mean hurley has/had a genuine interest
 
Last edited:
bendm said:
out of the thousand+ guys in the portal arent richmond and locke the only 2 we've been legitimately linked with so far?

that's gotta mean hurley has/had a genuine interest
Expand ...
What does "legitimately linked with" mean? We've reached out to at least a half dozen other transfers, including Yetna, Marreon Jackson, Tre Mitchell, Rocket Watts, and CJ Felder:

www.theuconnblog.com

UConn men’s basketball transfer tracker

Taking a closer look at some of the options on the transfer market for 2021-22 and how they fit in with the Huskies.
www.theuconnblog.com www.theuconnblog.com
 
8893 said:
We've reached out to at least a half dozen other transfers, including Yetna, Marreon Jackson, Tre Mitchell, Rocket Watts, and CJ Felder
Expand ...
the broadest definition possible for now ie reaching out to a BE level talent.

can add yetna, jackson, watts, and felder to the list.

that article doesnt say weve actually reached out to mitchell, carr, or rahim just that we might
 
Last edited:
.-.
bendm said:
the broadest definition possible for now ie reaching out to a BE level talent
Expand ...
Here's the latest I have, don't think I've missed anyone

C0ED2E4A-5BE6-48EC-97C9-A01A7EA09563.jpeg
 
I’d be real disappointed if it was Collins or Lundy. Staff killed it last spring so hopeful.

worry they are loyal to guys who aren’t getting us past the first weekend if that far.
 
rip7774 said:
I’d be real disappointed if it was Collins or Lundy. Staff killed it last spring so hopeful.

worry they are loyal to guys who aren’t getting us past the first weekend if that far.
Expand ...
yeah we all want locke, kadary and yetna but what if it's kolek, collins, and lundy?
 
bendm said:
the broadest definition possible for now ie reaching out to a BE level talent.

can add yetna, jackson, watts, and felder to the list.

that article doesnt say weve actually reached out to mitchell, carr, or rahim just that we might
Expand ...
That’s why I didn’t list Carr or Rahim. I listed Mitchell because we obviously have a very significant history with him and I believe we have reached out but that’s second hand info
 
.-.
UConnStats said:
I like Lundy personally and would be happy to have him.
Expand ...
stretch 4 potential?

almost 40% from 3 as a frosh but on low volume
32% last year but over 80% from the line
 
bendm said:
stretch 4 potential?

almost 40% from 3 as a frosh but on low volume
32% last year
Expand ...
Yeah I think Lundy fills a lot of 3/4 minutes that we have a hole at. 60 minutes between Martin/Jackson/Lundy at the 3/4 is what I'm hoping for
 
navery12 said:
Yeah I think Lundy fills a lot of 3/4 minutes that we have a hole at. 60 minutes between Martin/Jackson/Lundy at the 3/4 is what I'm hoping for
Expand ...
the other 20 to akok?
that would roughly break down frontcourt rotation as:
SF- aj (20) martin (20)
PF- akok (20) lundy (20)
C- sanogo (30) johnson (10)
 
Last edited:
.-.
bendm said:
stretch 4 potential?

almost 40% from 3 as a frosh but on low volume
32% last year but over 80% from the line
Expand ...
Yeah I like his stroke more than the 32% would indicate, and if you watch any tape on him, you’d see pretty quickly he has a lot more touch than our forwards showed this year (excluding Polley). He’d be a nice complimentary piece IMO.

To put it simply: He lacks what we have a lot of and has something we’re missing.
 
UConnStats said:
I like Lundy personally and would be happy to have him.
Expand ...

I was pretty down on Lundy initially just because of the drop in 3P% this season, but on second look, he dropped 32 on NCAA Tourney team VCU, 31 v. Maryland, 26 v. Ohio State, and 23 v. Seton Hall and did so efficiently this season.

Only two guys on UConn this season scored that much in general (Bouk / Polley) and only one of those guys did it against a NCAA Tournament team.

From looking at each of his box scores, it looks like he was peaking in December / January and then almost fell out of favor for one reason or another in February.

There could really be something here but I am curious how his production dropped off so much that he basically became Polley by the end of the year (multiple games of 15-18 minutes and <5 points).
 
There would be a lot of great reasons to get Richmond, but the best might be that Syracuse fans said they wanted him over AJ anyways when AJ decided to come to UConn and they got Richmond as a result.

If we ultimately end up with both, it would be hilarious.

Either way, Syracuse won’t have either on their roster next season 😂
 
bendm said:
the other 20 to akok?
that would roughly break down frontcourt rotation as:
SF- aj (20) martin (20)
PF- akok (20) lundy (20)
C- sanogo (30) johnson (10)
Expand ...
I think either Hawkins will play the 3 sometimes, or we’ll be using some three-guard lineups. AJ and Martin seems almost certain to play the 4 at times.
 
McLovin said:
There would be a lot of great reasons to get Richmond, but the best might be that Syracuse fans said they wanted him over AJ anyways when AJ decided to come to UConn and they got Richmond as a result.

If we ultimately end up with both, it would be hilarious.

Either way, Syracuse won’t have either on their roster next season 😂
Expand ...

Yeah I’m not gonna front, that is 100% a factor for me.

But then I realize he’d be the best creator on the roster as well, and he wasn’t awful from 3 last year either.
 
.-.
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,194
Messages
4,556,313
Members
10,442
Latest member
Virginiafan


Top Bottom