Just watched all his videos and its rare that a right-handed player likes to drive left. Very quick release and great handle with both hands. His ranking is way too low. Peach Jam is one of the best tournys and to be MVP shows you something. Will be a top 75 player when its all said and done. Better than the kid we lost to Rutgers.
As someone who has followed recruiting admittedly too closely for the last 25 to 30 years since my time as an undergrad - I used to buy the recruiting magazines in late summer/early autumn before there was the internet back in the early and mid 1990's... and then I remember waiting minutes for that old UConn newsletter (I forget the name of it) to load on my desktop some 20 years ago in the late 1990's - I see that some people still get way too caught up in a recruit's ranking.
... and I do not mean this as a direct shot at you, Candyman by quoting your post. Just that I see this in so many recruiting threads, and I think it is time to share some good information on recruiting for everyone:
Without question, recruiting rankings are an inexact, and often inaccurate "science".
- the most accurate rankings are almost always the Top 10 guys in any one class. Even the guys in the teens and 20's can often be wrong and significantly off.
- below the Top 25... You can almost take guys after that and bunch them in groups of 25 to 50... and even then the rankings are often about what a guy did in a game or two while playing in front of a particular recruiting analyst / reporter.
PERFECT EXAMPLE: Steve Enoch outplayed Top 15 (# 11 and 15 composite in 247Sport's 2015 rankings) overall big man Stephen Zimmerman in an AAU game in the summer of 2014, and it was witnessed by several of the prominent recruiting analysts. As a result, Enoch shot up from a little-known borderline 3-star recruit to a 4-star recruit Top 100 (#47 in the composite rankings) by the time the final rankings were released. And although Steve's potential remains high, his sustained play and results during actual games, both in high school at Norwalk and St. Thomas More, and while here at UConn, rarely if ever equaled what he did on that one day against Zimmerman. It should also be noted that Zimmerman's results in college (UNLV) have illustrated that he was seriously over-ranked by the recruiting analysts, as well.
- recruiting analysts tend to weigh physical attributes (height, athleticism) much more strongly than a recruit's desire, or even actual production. Every year there are many, many guys who because of their size and athleticism get ranked higher than other guys who are just flat out better basketball players, particularly for the college game. The examples are way too many to recount, but a few of the most glaring recent ones include Shabazz Napier, Bonzi Wells and yes, Christian Vital. If Akinjo were 2 inches taller, for example, he would already by a Top 50 recruit. The recruiting analysts often under-value the size of a player's heart and actual skills on the basketball court.
- recruiting analysts are also significantly biased by the AAU circuits. Guys they do not see as much or at all due to injury or some other factor are almost always under-ranked - usually significantly.
- lastly, I have also seen a bias exists with certain analysts who shall remain nameless toward the most well-known programs. When Duke, Kentucky, UNC or Kansas gets involved with a recruit, they tend to rise significantly in the rankings, if they are not near the top already. Watch for that with future recruits.
MOST ACCURATE WAY TO MEASURE A RECRUIT'S TRUE VALUE: Look at the schools that we are competing against for a recruit. Although this is also inexact, it is much more accurate than the actual recruiting rankings. These coaches jobs and livelihoods depend upon them being able to project a player's production during his college years. And as we already know, many of them are great at it... Jim Calhoun was a master at this, as are guys like Rick Pitino and Tom Izzo.
PERFECT EXAMPLE: Christian Vital's final ranking by the recruiting composite was a pedestrian mid to low 3-star #229 - but we had to beat out Louisville/Rick Pitino, Marquette, Alabama (Avery Johnson) and other top competitors for his services after his de-commitment from UNLV. Always take the coach's rankings over the recruiting analysts when trying to decide how good a recruit is, and can be at the college level.
The two big reasons to conclude that both James Akinjo and Dimon Carrigan are both SIGNIFICANTLY under-ranked in the recruiting services' rankings:
1. Production: Akinjo won the Peach Jam MVP, and just scored 42 points in the championship game of the Nor Cal Clash by scoring 42 points... and some still have him outside of the Top 100? That is a freaking joke. This guy has proved he is one of the top 10 point guards in this class. Period. Same thing for Carrigan. The guy had a monster summer and is already regarded the best shot blocker in this class, along with one of the top rebounders. Easily a Top 50 guy.
2. Who is recruiting these guys: P5's and top schools from other conferences abound. For Carrigan his list includes Syracuse, Miami Fla., Clemson, Texas and Wichita St. Akinjo's list includes California, Indiana, Maryland and Iowa State. Enough said, for both.
Whenever and wherever you can, use these two points to figure out how good a recruit really is... because in the long run, the rankings do not mean anything. Their actual production means everything.
BOTTOM LINE: Both Akinjo and Carrigan are Top 50 to Top 75 (at lowest) recruits and will most likely be in the Top 50 or even higher for actual production during their college careers. If we get both of them, even without Carey or Nembhard, we will be very happy in the years to come with this recruiting class.