- Joined
- Jan 31, 2018
- Messages
- 2,195
- Reaction Score
- 6,887
Diarra, Gilbert Aknijo Durham were blue chip recruits.
Diarra, Gilbert Aknijo Durham were blue chip recruits.
96
Jaelin Llewellyn
Video | Scouts Report
PG Lynchburg, VA
Virginia Episcopal School 6'2'' 160 81
PRINCETON
COMMITTED
07/24/2017
97
James Akinjo
Video | Scouts Report
PG Richmond, CA
Salesian High School 6'0'' 170 81
CONNECTICUT
SIGNED
The ranking Akinjo has on espn is 97 - coincidentally one rank lower than the Princeton recruit. I guess I could have said "ranked forty spots lower than a BC recruit" but really I was just going off of the first logo I saw in proximity. Like I said at the beginning of my last post that you cherry picked the Princeton comment from, I like Akinjo and I think he's underrated, but let's not make him out to be some can't miss prospect worthy of keeping a floundering coach around. On to your next specious argument I guess.....
I never debated the factuality of your statement. But you’ve made it clear that you want to frame said facts to make Akinjo as undesirable as possible.
He's ranked higher on ESPN than he is on rivals (112) and 247 (106), so my choosing ESPN actually paints him in a good light. Again, I'm not arguing that he's not a good player and that I'd love to see him running the point for us next year. But to act like we have to entertain the idea of keeping KO around so we don't lose a recruiting class of this caliber is laughable. The princeton recruit mention was a fact I thought warranted mention as, a few years ago, it would be almost unfathomable that an ivy league school was pulling in kids ranked higher than anyone in UConn's class.
Princeton will pull in a kid who wants to be a doctor over Uconn every day. Akinjo was offered scholarships by Virginia, Indiana, Colorado, California, among many others. Rivals rankings are one guide....look at Polley who was rated over Carlton for example...the guy is going to be a very good PG at this level.He's ranked higher on ESPN than he is on rivals (112) and 247 (106), so my choosing ESPN actually paints him in a good light. Again, I'm not arguing that he's not a good player and that I'd love to see him running the point for us next year. But to act like we have to entertain the idea of keeping KO around so we don't lose a recruiting class of this caliber is laughable. The princeton recruit mention was a fact I thought warranted mention as, a few years ago, it would be almost unfathomable that an ivy league school was pulling in kids ranked higher than anyone in UConn's class.
Exactly. Look at who these guys have offers from to see how good they really are.What was Shabazz ranked again?
What was Lamb ranked again?
Oakfor ?
I like your post but I think he wouldn't play that role willingly. The only positive about him is he can spot up and make open shots. One rotten apple will spoil the others.I agree he brings other liabilities that at the moment offset his shooting prowess, but if he somehow through coaching or just personal willingness to be better on defense, you could have a poor man's Giffey: someone to spread the floor with the threat of a shooter (which this team has none outside him at the moment).
He is shooting 39% from 3 on the year. The next closest who shoots enough 3s to be worth mentioning is Vital at 32%. UConn needs him unless Vital/Adams miraculously start shooting close to 40% than 30% from 3. His defense is frustrating as are the turnovers, but in the right offense (or more talented team) you don't ask him to create on ball, rather off ball and benefit from efficient shooting without the turnover liability.
UConn will have losing records in back to back seasons. We don't have the luxury of just wishing away talented players in hopes new ones will be as good or better than those currently in the fold instead trying to make both the new and old work would be the best option (if presented).
Didn’t Princeton just beat out ALABAMA football for a qb recruit?
That means Ollie has to stay correct? If Ollie goes so do Chill and Kill or am I mistaken on that?I hope we keep these two Blaze certified recruits.
I think people are making a mistake if they don’t understand how Blaze changed everything and regardless of what happens at the end of the season, we don’t throw the baby out with the bath water.
Exactly. Look at who these guys have offers from to see how good they really are.
He's ranked higher on ESPN than he is on rivals (112) and 247 (106), so my choosing ESPN actually paints him in a good light. Again, I'm not arguing that he's not a good player and that I'd love to see him running the point for us next year. But to act like we have to entertain the idea of keeping KO around so we don't lose a recruiting class of this caliber is laughable. The princeton recruit mention was a fact I thought warranted mention as, a few years ago, it would be almost unfathomable that an ivy league school was pulling in kids ranked higher than anyone in UConn's class.
That means Ollie has to stay correct? If Ollie goes so do Chill and Kill or am I mistaken on that?
I went back 4 years on espn rankings and the top 30 mostly turn out to be good college players. After 30 it's much more of a crap shoot. I'm in the camp that says we don't have keep KO because these two recruits are too valuable to lose. His recruiting might be part of the reason to fire him. Lastly, I see so many lineups for next year that have Gilbert starting. I would write that in pencil. I hope for the best but we need to prepare for alternatives.
Even if I agreed with some or all of what you've written, I'd tell you that "We..." does not apply. You are unremittingly awful, and the board would be better off if you never posted again.We do NOT want Larrier back. He's not a winning player, turnover machine, awful decision making. Sid Wilson will be twice the player Larrier will ever be.
Matthews judging by the article seems committed to UCONN and not strictly to Kevin Ollie which is good because I like Matthews game.
Akinjo is more 50/50 but can be persuaded by a good incoming hire to stay.
Whatever their decision, these guys are not can't miss prospects that are worth keeping Ollie around for.
PS: One of the main requirements for our next head coach will be ability to bring in good players right away and recruit well.
Facey was listed as 66 by Rivals....Really??? Let us not get overly excited by rankings.
The fans are already gone. If he goes, at least they'll return.Ollie goes, everybody goes.
I just read 4 posts by you and didn't get much out of any of them. It's not really a knock on you, so much as wondering what's the point of framing things the way you did on a post about two recruits having good senior years.1. rankings are no the be all, end all, but it's tough to deny that players that are more highly ranked tend to pan out at a better rate than those who aren't
2. Has KO shown that he has a good eye for talent?
3. Has KO shown that he can develop unheralded talent?