- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 13,892
- Reaction Score
- 35,822
And tragically misunderstood.Kevin Ollie is the kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful human being I've ever known in my life.
And tragically misunderstood.Kevin Ollie is the kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful human being I've ever known in my life.
I want to see what Chill can do, but I'm also skeptical of Ollie's ability to coach and develop anyone brought in. I need to see the following to get remotely excited about him returning next season:
I really have wanted to Ollie to succeed all season but for every time we see some remote progress in the team and players, they take 2-3 steps back. I personally need all of 3 of these conditions met to feel good about 2018-19 with Ollie at the helm.
- We see some form of quality basketball akin to what was exemplified @ Tulane, v. UCF, v. SMU in the post Gilbert part of the season (i.e. show that they can beat lesser talent by a good margin, stay competitive with better teams)
- Able to retain Jalen Adams in offseason, Larrier I would be psyched, too, but not counting on it (historically Ollie has not done well with significant roster turnover, as any coach would struggle with this issue, and the team desperately needs these guys back to have a shot at being competitive next year)
- Able to limit transfers (if any) to the guys at the end of the bench (same reason as point #2)
do we even have room for transfers?
Also I'm gonna disagree with point #3 simply because that's how we ended up with Cobb, Williams, DO and Anderson. We don't need guys like that. If you're taking a transfer we should at least be shooting for a Purvis.
Otherwise try to develop a frosh.
but again, do we have room for any anyway?
Might have confusing the way I worded that last point. I meant limit players transferring out of the program, not transferring in.
If you tell me this is the following roster next year, then maybe Ollie can make some noise next year...maybe:
Starting: Adams, Gilbert, Larrier, Wilson, Carlton
Akinjo/Vital first off bench for the guards
Polley/Matthews Jr. in for the wings
Diarra/Whaley/Kisunas for the bigs
I guess KW & Cobb would be the odd guys out if Adams/Larrier didn't leave early...
That team has some depth.
Who starts for you if Larrier goes pro?
At the beginning of games I would give the nod to Diarra at 4, move Wilson to 3. Then move to 3 guard lineups at varying points throughout the game considering we would have 3 good ball handlers (Adams, Akinjo, Gilbert) that all need time on the court. You could pick 2 of those 3 and push Vital to the 3 at varying parts of the game. Gilbert also may have the training wheels on early in the year since we saw what happened when you don't do that. Maybe Akinjo or Vital starts in that case.
You have Wilson at the 4? What's your rationale? I've always pinned him as closer to "2" than "4" (really, a prototypical college 3). But I could be off. I only watched him play once
I agree with this. But if they all come back, wouldn't they only need 1 transfer? So they could keep one of Cobb or KW.Might have confusing the way I worded that last point. I meant limit players transferring out of the program, not transferring in.
If you tell me this is the following roster next year, then maybe Ollie can make some noise next year...maybe:
Starting: Adams, Gilbert, Larrier, Wilson, Carlton
Akinjo/Vital first off bench for the guards
Polley/Matthews Jr. in for the wings
Diarra/Whaley/Kisunas for the bigs
I guess KW & Cobb would be the odd guys out if Adams/Larrier didn't leave early...
Sean Miller isn't coming here.If you told me we could have this roster with a shiny new coach, I'd be very agreeable.
He'd be excited about these 2 kids if he didn't have an agenda, there's your answer. Honestly almost wish they would keep KO just to watch that show from guys like him LOL![]()
Trust in Blaze
I still think there is a pretty decent chance KO is back and the best thing about it would be his reaction.
Aren't we all?And tragically misunderstood.
I'm tragically hip.Aren't we all?
National ranking #95, boneyard ranking #5.McDonalds all Americans are mostly based on the rankings. Can’t say a kid got snubbed when he’s ranked 110.
He's 6'7" and I don't believe known as a shooter (for perspective, Larrier is listed at 6'8"). Rivals mentioned him a wing replacement for Larrier, the Hartford Courant referred to him as a Forward, SNY refers to him as a wing. He'd be pretty big for a 2, from the video I have seen does not have the handle of a guard. I always figured he could become a mismatch problem for opponents like D. Daniels was at 6'9" moving back and forth between the 3 & 4 spots.
Sid’s real height is 6-4 or 6-5 and he will be the skinniest guy on the team. He may be a wing in the slashing sense but definitely not a 4.
It remains to be seen if Whaley can hold up in the post from simply being overpowered. Diarra is maybe 6-6 or 6-7 and he gets exposed against a bigger, taller guy in the post. Cobb has some post potential given his girth but who knows if he will ever put things together? The odds are against it. Williams is a battler but short for post defense but he is good on the horizontal rebound position game for someone with a 44 inch vertical.
I was surprised by that with Williams too. He's an old-school box out, horizontal rebounder, despite the fact that he can jump out of the gym.
I was surprised by that with Williams too. He's an old-school box out, horizontal rebounder, despite the fact that he can jump out of the gym.
He's 6'7" and I don't believe known as a shooter (for perspective, Larrier is listed at 6'8"). Rivals mentioned him a wing replacement for Larrier, the Hartford Courant referred to him as a Forward, SNY refers to him as a wing. He'd be pretty big for a 2, from the video I have seen does not have the handle of a guard. I always figured he could become a mismatch problem for opponents like D. Daniels was at 6'9" moving back and forth between the 3 & 4 spots.
My guess is if Kwintin got the minutes this year he would have been our leading rebounder.Sid’s real height is 6-4 or 6-5 and he will be the skinniest guy on the team. He may be a wing in the slashing sense but definitely not a 4.
It remains to be seen if Whaley can hold up in the post from simply being overpowered. Diarra is maybe 6-6 or 6-7 and he gets exposed against a bigger, taller guy in the post. Cobb has some post potential given his girth but who knows if he will ever put things together? The odds are against it. Williams is a battler but short for post defense but he is good on the horizontal rebound position game for someone with a 44 inch vertical.
Our common bond.Aren't we all?
96As usual, a lot of really specious arguments by the people criticizing recruiting.
"One spot below a Princeton recruit" is a pretty weird way to describe someone with the ranking and acclaim Akinjo possesses.
Might have confusing the way I worded that last point. I meant limit players transferring out of the program, not transferring in.
If you tell me this is the following roster next year, then maybe Ollie can make some noise next year...maybe:
Starting: Adams, Gilbert, Larrier, Wilson, Carlton
Akinjo/Vital first off bench for the guards
Polley/Matthews Jr. in for the wings
Diarra/Whaley/Kisunas for the bigs
I guess KW & Cobb would be the odd guys out if Adams/Larrier didn't leave early...
My guess is if Kwintin got the minutes this year he would have been our leading rebounder.
96
Jaelin Llewellyn
Video | Scouts Report
PG Lynchburg, VA
Virginia Episcopal School 6'2'' 160 81
PRINCETON
COMMITTED
07/24/2017
97
James Akinjo
Video | Scouts Report
PG Richmond, CA
Salesian High School 6'0'' 170 81
CONNECTICUT
SIGNED
The ranking Akinjo has on espn is 97 - coincidentally one rank lower than the Princeton recruit. I guess I could have said "ranked forty spots lower than a BC recruit" but really I was just going off of the first logo I saw in proximity. Like I said at the beginning of my last post that you cherry picked the Princeton comment from, I like Akinjo and I think he's underrated, but let's not make him out to be some can't miss prospect worthy of keeping a floundering coach around. On to your next specious argument I guess.....