- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 103,780
- Reaction Score
- 428,378
Well, considering USC and UCLA "applied" and it stayed out of the news, I'd say public posturing is a desperate attempt for attention.
Well, considering USC and UCLA "applied" and it stayed out of the news, I'd say public posturing is a desperate attempt for attention.
You can stretch this to 20 years where we've had a considerable leadership void.Uconn is on its 4th President in 4 years- not a winning formula for leadership
Lack of leadership over the last 10 years has killed UConn . No stability nor tenureUconn is on its 4th President in 4 years- not a winning formula for leadership
Maybe FSU, Clemson, and Miami to the SEC.
Then UConn, ND, and Kansas to the ACC?
Probably starts with a weak Board of Trustees - not sure why our Flagship University has such a poor track record of hiring.Lack of leadership over the last 10 years has killed UConn . No stability nor tenure
I don't think that's a fair characterization of Herbst or (Austin), granted she was the one that presided over the ACC debacle back in the early 2010s, but she had also just walked in the door but she was not an interim in any facet to my memory. The university did thrive under her academically but of course she is responsible for athletics not being in what used to be the P5 today which I guess doesn't matter as much now today as it did yesterday.You can stretch this to 20 years where we've had a considerable leadership void.
Every president over that stretch was an interim, either by label or by action.
It's just stuck in my head that California if it was a country would have the 5th highest GDP and it's shy of $4 trillion.This is true (and better for the point being made).
My apologies.
UConn leadership has been abysmal for a long time.You can stretch this to 20 years where we've had a considerable leadership void.
Every president over that stretch was an interim, either by label or by action.
But it’s also the most pro-heavy region in the nation. It’s not a stronghold for college sports. The West Coast has had similar issues, and now it’s power conference was just neutered.The northeast corridor would be the 4th largest economy in the world if it's at $4 trillion.
I would love the idea but why would the B10 take UConn now, given the competition. I think ACC more likely landing place for UConn. One thing for both conferences is that Connecticut's media market includes metro NYC. That is a prize.Washington, Oregon, Notre Dame, and UConn to round out the B1G. Who says no?
Northeast is college hoops crazy, they just unfortunately don't do college football well so there's disinterest.But it’s also the most pro-heavy region in the nation. It’s not a stronghold for college sports.
The B1G is making an incredible amount of money. They won't share it with the rest of the Pac-10. If these schools had value, the Pac Network would be making them a bundle.you're not reading. this is assuming colorado is one of the 6 schools that leaves. i'm a Cal fan and no one cares about their football program, not even the students. wsu and osu bring nothing to the table either.
the big12 already brings in more revenue than the PAC and you think losing half its members will someone change that?
The B1G payout dwarfs NDs payout for basketball from the ACC. By a lot.How so? It states the GOR would have to be paid, meaning for the next 15 years. I don’t fully understand it all, but it doesn’t equate to a relatively small buyout to me. Unless you mean football only, which I don’t see B1G allowing them to only come in football for next 15 years.
ND currently gets everything it wants: football independence, national coverage on NBC, access to the CFP, basketball in the ACC, and hockey in the B1G. They are still getting a healthy sum of money from NBC. They will be fine.The B1G payout dwarfs NDs payout for basketball from the ACC. By a lot.
What do people here think about this. Could it lead to UConn and Kansas becoming friendly rivals, and then going together as a pair to B10 or ACC.Kansas to the Big East & football independent?
This was posted on Kansas forum a few hours ago. Tweet was sent out by Xavier (can't confirm real since I didn't see it myself).
![]()
I wonder if the next big shoe to drop is the two super conferences telling the NCAA “hey, it’s been a blast, but we’ve got it from here”.
As for the ACC GOR, I assume at some price a school can buy back their interest. Assuming the differential between getting in with the SEC/Big or not justifies the price.
Agree that I don’t think the SEC needs FSU or Clemson. People keep confusing markets with success on the field. NC and Virginia are the big incremental markets to grab.
Are you saying the big10 isn’t interested in also adding UW and oregon etc? I bet they areThe B1G is making an incredible amount of money. They won't share it with the rest of the Pac-10. If these schools had value, the Pac Network would be making them a bundle.
Notre Dame. This move was about backing the leprechaun into a corner and forcing him to break. That’s what’s up.I'd think it would have to be Stanford. Academics line up with B1G "beliefs/standards". Huge market for NoCal. Easy flights in/out of SFO or other airports. Money isn't an issue for Stanford. Big name recognition and outstanding in Olympic and non-revenue sports.
I actually think 38 million a year is high even for a full member. I think it’s more like 32 million a year. Keep in mind however, that Notre Dame is not a full member. They are only in for basketball an Olympic sports. They get paid $10.8 million per year.It’s like $38M a year, so yeah. Take $38M from an ACC school and you have UConn’s budget situation. It’s not doable while also trying to run a Big Ten program for 15 years on zero television money.
I don’t know if anyone really knows Notre Dame’s situation with the ACC…I guess I would be shocked if it was not a sweetheart deal for the Irish.
Notre Dame. This move was about backing the leprechaun into a corner and forcing him to break. That’s what’s up.
The ACC doesn’t “own” any of Notre Dame’s football games. Notre Dame is independent but has a scheduling agreement with the ACC.It might be news to you, but it’s the same as it always has been. Exit fee (~$52 million) + GOR. Notre Dame has a football contract with NBC so the ACC only owns 5 games/year.
Notre Dame could chase the money of course. The college landscape has changed irrefutably. I think UNC could be looking at negotiated settlement at this point, but who knows. The B10 seems to have gone all-in on the West Coast, so the SEC might be the only suiter. Time will tell. And maybe sooner than anyone expected from even this morning.
Well the numbers are a bit off. ACC is at $36 million payout now, though it will go up as the ACC Network now is at full rollout. And you forgot to add the NBC contract of about $15 million.I actually think 38 million a year is high even for a full member. I think it’s more like 32 million a year. Keep in mind however, that Notre Dame is not a full member. They are only in for basketball an Olympic sports. They get paid $10.8 million per year.
So, if Notre Dame decides that they finally want to join the Big Ten, their ACC GOR isn’t going to be an impediment. Let’s say that the value of their basketball an Olympic sports is worth double in the Big Ten what it is in the ACC, which is probably just a little bit high. they’d be giving up 20 million of the 60 that they would get in the big 10 leaving them with 40 million or roughly 30 million more than they’re making now.
Link
I actually think 38 million a year is high even for a full member. I think it’s more like 32 million a year. Keep in mind however, that Notre Dame is not a full member. They are only in for basketball an Olympic sports. They get paid $10.8 million per year.
So, if Notre Dame decides that they finally want to join the Big Ten, their ACC GOR isn’t going to be an impediment. Let’s say that the value of their basketball an Olympic sports is worth double in the Big Ten what it is in the ACC, which is probably just a little bit high. they’d be giving up 20 million of the 60 that they would get in the big 10 leaving them with 40 million or roughly 30 million more than they’re making now.
Link
The SI article that I linked spells out the numbers. Now that you mention it, I do remember that there was some provision for period of time that if Notre Dame was to join the conference it would be the ACC. I have no recollection of whether there was any penalty provision associated with that outside of what they forfeit for GOR and exit fees.I’m not including ND with ACC schools.
I really have no idea what their situation is with the ACC and I don’t think either side has actually spelled it out. I remember Swofford saying that if ND joined a conference, it would have to be the ACC, but I am also sure that the time period in question was not the duration of the television contract.
They own the tv rights to Notre Dame’s football games at ACC arenas. It’s why you can find some Irish games on the ACC network.The ACC doesn’t “own” any of Notre Dame’s football games. Notre Dame is independent but has a scheduling agreement with the ACC.
Of course. But more than that, if ND wants independence but all their options are in the BiG, like USC & Michigan for example, then they’ll be forced to join whether they like it or not.Yes, I am quite certain the B1G or any other conference would love to have ND.
The SEC loves Vandy it gives them a semblance of credibility as academic institutions plus who doesn’t like going to NashvilleAre the B1G and $EC going to start kicking out the worthless schools (Vanderbilt, Northwestern, Rutgers, Minnesota, Mississippi St, etc) when they try to raid the top dogs of the ACC and PAC?