ShakyTheMohel
Is it 11:11 yet?
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 8,835
- Reaction Score
- 20,907
He recruited Ron Johnson. I wonder how this affects the moral of the coaching staff?
Moral or morale? Freudian slip?

He recruited Ron Johnson. I wonder how this affects the moral of the coaching staff?

Not what Diaco says Dan, but that's my hunch as well. He may well feel like not being allowed to live his life in accordance with deeply held belief is big a cost for this job. Unfortunate because his core message, having young men live their lives according to a higher standard is a valid one. He just phrased it in a way that forced the university to respond once the public began to react negatively.To be honest, Mike, I thought we had finally reached the point where it had all blown over, and that the Spring Game was going to make everyone forget that the comment / reaction had ever happened. Maybe he felt more strongly about his quote and being able to deliver that message than what many (myself included) thought. Or maybe the state's reaction to it was not what he wanted out of a new job.
Either way....wow...
A man with known Christian beliefs who has a strong desire to express them in the locker room and on the practice field shouldn't ever been hired at UConn.
Well I do, but I don't think he intended it to be.You understand that "we're going to make sure they understand that should be in the center of our huddle, that that's something that is important" isn't just a statement of his own spirituality, don't you?
Don't know how to respond to this Chin. I understand your point but it would be disappointing if expressing your faith is prohibited at the University of Connecticut. I think his wording was unfortunate but not his message.
Don't know how to respond to this Chin. I understand your point but it would be disappointing if expressing your faith is prohibited at the University of Connecticut. I think his wording was unfortunate but not his message.
Because it's Connecticut. This wouldn't be an issue at Texas, Alabama or many other schools. In Connecticut? It is.
Um, that's blatantly what he's stating there.
The only thing obvious is that we all have our own opinion on the issue...
The man is a devout christian and the University and State asked him to keep that information to himself while he was at work.
Only in Connecticut. This man would have helped us tremendously in recruiting young christian men from the South. But we don't want to offend some soccer mom in Hartford. Unbelievable.
Wonder who they will hire to replace him.
What you are saying is not so much that it's Connecticut as it's not the Confederacy. And that's a good thing.
For recruiting of course,but I stand by te Allh sateYou couldn't field a competitive team by openly admitted that you are promoting Islam in the huddle.
I don't think you could field a competitive team by solely recruiting aethiests and agnostics.
Couldn't do it with Buddhists, Wiccans or Jews.
The only category of religious beliefs and recruiting pool size is Christianity.
Not saying you should do it at a public university, but if you were to do it, that's the only combination that could be sustained.
Ridiculous.
What makes you think Allah isn't already there? You think we don't have muslim players on this roster? We don't have evangelical Christian players in the huddle? We don't have atheists in the huddle? Jews? They get along just fine, and they have been for as long as the sport as been played. Religious tolerance is established among people that live and work together daily.
A border was crossed here and has nothing to do with whatever religious beliefs a person adheres to.
The line crossed, is the difference between religious tolerance, and enforcement of the principle that government shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion. You got to know your culture. It's clear that Kevin Ollie does know his culture, and Ernest Jones did not know the culture of the northeast. Bob Diaco does know the culture of the northeast.
I'll tell you what, I wish Coach Jones the best in wherever he goes.
To think that this has nothing to do with the media storm that was created by his comments to Desmond Conner, and that reporter's choice to publish those comments, is foolish. The fact that he consciously chose to say what he did publicly to a reporter, is evidence enough, that he was either inexperienced in, or completely outside of his comfort realm in his chosen profession within the culture he found himself working in. No comment on the reporter's choice of what to do with the words.
Logic would dictate that the latter won out in his decision making regarding where and how he continues in his chosen profession.
Recruiting? We're still going to recruit, and football will be played.
But last thing.....since the way this situation ahs been handled publicly.....regarding the conflict between sociopolitical religious tolerance, and enforcement of the establishment clause.
I will have a difficult choice to be tolerant publicly to people making decisions regarding the actions of my state university, regarding scheduling of fall football games, that interfere with my right to grill non-kosher pork products and eat them in daylight hours.
Sorry to see him go, but it was his choice. If he was forced out, it would've been awhile ago. Hard to speculate if it was related or not. If he feels the backlash was too serious at our school, then I have no idea what he'd expect at a big-time University in the North. I hope it was something personal and unrelated and that he finds success wherever he goes, whether or not I agree with his personal take on spirituality.
You are undoubtably correct, which says more about the religious training in those pockets than it does about their care or comprehension of our Constitution or whether it should be okay at the U of Alabama. It's why people of non-Christian religions and no religion at all are at least at the margin of risk from the true believers becoming politically dominant. See the Texas Board of Ed and talk to Jews in Texas about how they feel about the Board. I have and it is not a happy thing for them.There are pockets of the country where the population would be okay with what his message is and pockets where it's not okay. I don't think the Mason-Dixon line is the only way to measure it.
To reiterate, this hire never should have happened because the outcome was inevitable. The only variable was the time frame.
You are undoubtably correct, which says more about the religious training about those pockets than it does about their care or comprehension of our Constitution or whether it should be okay at the U of Alabama. It's why people of non-Christian religions and no religion at all are at least at the margin of risk from the true believers becoming politically dominant. See the Texas Board of Ed and talk to Jews in Texas about how they feel about the Board. I have and it is not a happy thing for them.
For recruiting of course,but I stand by te Allh sate
Carl my good friend, you missed my point. The point was not about people of different faiths or no faith at all being on the team, it was a point that if a coach said that they were going to bring Allah into the huddle as a matter of official team routine, those who condemn SH on her stand as being PC is suspect would not urge such tolerance toward the coaching agenda. They understand not the Constitution of the US.
Let's blame Dez for everything and move on.
You are undoubtably correct, which says more about the religious training in those pockets than it does about their care or comprehension of our Constitution or whether it should be okay at the U of Alabama. It's why people of non-Christian religions and no religion at all are at least at the margin of risk from the true believers becoming politically dominant. See the Texas Board of Ed and talk to Jews in Texas about how they feel about the Board. I have and it is not a happy thing for them.
I won't speak for anyone else, but my point was that the "Allah in the Huddle" is a strawman and not worth considering because it won't ever happen on the football field. Might it occur elsewhere at a public university? Maybe/probably.
But football coaches have a funny thing about wanting to win and wanting to keep their job.
Nope, by definition it is not a strawman argument at all.
Giving as an example something that isn't going to occur then saying why it shouldn't happen is the exact definition of a straw man.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/strawman
Full Definition of STRAW MAN
1
: a weak or imaginary opposition (as an argument or adversary) set up only to be easily confuted
People have been doing exactly that for quite some time now. It's not even a question of north versus south, people are self-segregating (primarily along economic and social lines, but also racial/religious) zip code by zip code. There's a book I got for christmas a while back on this topic ... uh, I haven't read yet but I will read it soon.I have to admit I never understood why anyone would want to live anywhere in this country that isn't a good fit for them culturally. It's why you'll never see me live in NYC or any other major metro area.
It's the 21st C. If it's that much of an issue and you are in an area where your beliefs are so far in the minority that you'll have to deal with decisions well outside your beliefs, move.
Here's a good article an map showing where and how the strands of ethnicity, economic class and religion meander through the country. Very few states are homogenous. It's a matter of mix. In Connecticut the mix is heavily leaned towards not professing faith as a state employee while in the performance of their jobs. In other states, the mix leans differently.
http://www.tufts.edu/alumni/magazine/fall2013/features/up-in-arms.html
View attachment 5049
answer this question honestly then. Why do you think it will never occur?
I think teaching Constitutional history is bare bones sucky in our country. Kids learn more about Columbus than they do Samuel Johnson (not the brew) and Thomas Jefferson, Madison, Jackson and others who shaped the direction of the country, for better or worse. Jerry Falwell was not a founding father.
I already did earlier in this thread, but.
There isn't a large enough population willing to sustain a public university program that has coaches praising Allah. Freedom of association is as much a part of our Constitution as freedom of religion. And it's not just Islam. As I wrote earlier you couldn't do it with Jews, Wiccans, Agnositcs/Atheists or any combination other than Christianity. Doesn't mean you have to go down the road. But if you do then due to the sheer number of players you need, Christianity would be the only path to success for football.
Could a private school do it? Probably. Whether exclusively or near exclusively there are several schools with religious affiliations that have made it.
Could you try it for other sports that require a smaller pool of athletes for success? Probably.