Dorka Should Start | Page 4 | The Boneyard

Dorka Should Start

Morgan Tuck and Megan Walker were already starters when they left. Natalie Butler probably was never going to be a starter here, and went to a school where she could be a star. Azura Stevens however is a good example, because she probably would have started the next year if she had stayed, but was still drafted pretty high as a great sub on a great program.

If Dorka is the best player this year, go ahead and start her. Geno seems to grant seniors and incumbents an advantage that is probably more than I would give, but if it is decisive I think he will make the change. But I think Dorka is likely to return for other reasons.

I think both Liv and Dorka are possible long term WNBA players, but far from locks, more like marginal prospects that may not be picked in the first round, but are very likely to be able to play for pay in Europe as their floor. A Uconn pedigree as a star player on the bench or as a starter helps your chances of employment there.

A player who is fairly certain they have a WNBA future is more likely to jump into the draft. Morgan, Megan, and Azura were all in that category. Dorka is not considered at that level, at least yet. In addition she is in grad school this year, not starting next year, so presumably she is only one additional year from a master's degree, which makes staying another year (probably as a starter) much more logical.

But that doesn't mean I think she shouldn't start this year if she is better. I just think the burden of proof for Geno when bumping a senior incumbent is high but that either way, next year she is the probable starter, and probable to return.
Keep in mind that just as Dorka has an option to return to UCONN next year, so does Liv. Which further supports my contention that we need to be playing for this season and as @Carnac stated "let next year take care of itself."
I don't think who starts for UCONN should have anything to do with WNBA draft stock but since you took it there, Liv has some significant work to do to improve her WNBA draft stock. One mock draft currently has her projected to be a 3rd round WNBA and has (6) players at the C or PF position projected ahead of Liv.
Sharika Austin Mississippi :Jessica Carter Mississippi State :Lorela Cubaj-Georgia Tech :Ellissa Cunane NCSt :Monika Cziinano-Iowa :Queen Egbo- Baylor


This mock draft did not include Dorka but it will be real interesting to see where Dorka would be projected compared to Liv.
 
DId the commenters here SEE the game or is this based on an audio feed ?
Watched the game. Dorka is more mobile, more aggressive, has a good outside shot, and plays better defense. Doesn't matter who the opposition is. She is just more talented. Ducharmes is tremendous as well. Quick, agile, and she should show a good outside shot as well, based on her past.

ONO kept getting blocked out, missed outside shots, just like last year. Dorka's the better player.
 
Right now, I believe Liv should start the next game. I agree with something Oldude said prior to the Fort Hays State game: No one should lose or gain a starting spot based on their play in this exhibition game.

If Dorka out plays her again in this game, then you have to start her against Minnesota. You’re supposed to put your best 5 on the floor to begin the game. If that happens, Liv can still help coming off the bench.
As long as Dorka is not dramatically better than Liv and no way such a small sample size proves this, I think Liv will start but minutes will be strongly based on that particular games performance. I think the evidence is clear Geno puts value (emotional and otherwise) on players who have put in the minutes in the program as one of the team leaders and will give the benefit of the doubt to them

I know there is precedence such as Kelly Schumacher but in 2020, WNBA (career) opportunities which was not an issue on the 2000 team do enter the decision process in 2020.

UConn may be as close to a pure meritocracy as you can get but there are other human issues to consider.
 
Last edited:
A "new toy" would not have been necessary if the old one was serviceable, so perhaps this excitement is justified.
I agree excitement is justified. Calling Liv unserviceable seems a bit harsh though. Calling for Dorka to start after watching one game against a D2 opponent is an exaggeration.
Let’s see how they both fair in the tournament. I’d love for Dorka to prove she’s better than Liv, that’s only going to make us that much better. I just haven’t seen enough yet. They looked pretty even in the exhibition against a much lesser opponent, they just have different styles.
 
Shameful we're asking and responding to a question like this.
Liv has earned her right and contributed to a team we all know and love. Let's Go Liv!!!

The post shouldn't be about who should sit or start but more about the fact that we potentially have depth at a position we been lacking at since 2017. 17 and 18 classes was all perimeter players and it left us with a huge void. Liv shouldering the middle duties solo is a heavy burden, most wouldn't survive. Hopefully The young Post (DeBerry, Paith) learn from the Bermuda Triangle and help set the table for the next 4 years.

UCONN future is bright with the Bermuda Triangle (Liv, Aliyah, Dorka) sprinkled with DeBerry and Paith occasionally.
 
Has there ever been a player that receives such disrespect from UConn fans than live?? And @Fairfield Fan sayin Piath and DeBerry looked better than Liv in the game and my be better at the of the year. Ya'll talk about the Tennessee fans really need to look in the mirror. And ya may need your UConn fan card taken away!!
 
.-.
There was no anointing and yours was the first post to invoke Tina as a comparison for Dorka. The BY is a very knowledge group and just in case we were to forget we have 3 years of mostly forgettable performances by Liv in big games. I believe Dorka and Liv both played against the same Ft. Hays team so I'm not sure what point you are trying to make by pointing out the height of the Ft. Hays fron line. You and many others have a very valid point: Dorka or Liv starting should not be based on who played better in a Ft. Hays exhibition game. So let's not based in on that, let's base it on who has accomplished more since both players have played roughly the same amount of NCAA D1 games.
No, let's base their playing time on how they do as we move thru the season. My guess is that they both will play lots of minutes, as they are both good players. Since you mention what they have accomplished already, looking at their stats from last season, Liv had the better shooting %s, from the field, from 3, and from the foul line. Somewhat concerning is Dorka shooting about 43% from the line. Dorka had very few blocks, very few assists, while Live had 53 blocks, and averaged about 3 assists. Dorka's 11 rebounds may have been partly because they didn't seem to have any other major rebounders. Liv averaged 8, on a team with 5 other players averaging close to 5 or more. So let us see how their seasons progress. Their different styles may very well complement each other.
 
Last edited:
No, let's base their playing time on how they do as we move thru the season. My guess is that they both will play lots of minutes, as they are both good players. Since you mention what they have accomplished already, looking at their stats from last season, Liv had the better shooting %s, from the field, from 3, and from the foul line. Somewhat concerning is Dorka shooting about 40% from the line. Dorka had very few blocks, very few assists, while Live had 53 blocks, and averaged about 3 assists. Dorka's 11 rebounds may have been partly because they didn't seem to have any other major rebounders. Liv averaged 8, on a team with 5 other players averaging close to 5 or more. So let us see how their seasons progress. Their different styles may very well complement each other.
Fair enough. Another part of what they accomplish can be viewed in comparison of conference played in. Dorka was 1st team All Big 10 (2X). Liv was not 1st team in the BE or the American which hopefully you would agree should have been easier to accomplish. Dorka played in a conference which produced 5 tournament teams last year (Iowa, Indiana, Northwestern, Maryland, & Michigan). Among the 5 Big 10 Teams only Northwestern failed to advance to the sweet 16. So put another way 1/4 (25%) of the teams in the sweet sixteen were from the conference in which Dorka played and was named All conference.
Dorka FT shooting % is a concern but so is Liv's propensity for disappearing in big games.
 
Keep in mind that just as Dorka has an option to return to UCONN next year, so does Liv. Which further supports my contention that we need to be playing for this season and as @Carnac stated "let next year take care of itself."
I don't think who starts for UCONN should have anything to do with WNBA draft stock but since you took it there, Liv has some significant work to do to improve her WNBA draft stock. One mock draft currently has her projected to be a 3rd round WNBA and has (6) players at the C or PF position projected ahead of Liv.
Sharika Austin Mississippi :Jessica Carter Mississippi State :Lorela Cubaj-Georgia Tech :Ellissa Cunane NCSt :Monika Cziinano-Iowa :Queen Egbo- Baylor


This mock draft did not include Dorka but it will be real interesting to see where Dorka would be projected compared to Liv.
I saw one, don't remember where, that had Dorka a little ahead of Liv but both were in the teens.
 
dorka is at the absolute tippy top for all players in offensive boards.
the only big time name playing for a bigtime team even close to her for this is aliyah boston.
and, only playing in 17 games last season, her record for double-doubles (12) is more than any other member of our team.
i don't care who starts, but i do know who is a playa. dorka is a playa, a winning playa, and she came here for one reason and one reason only,
to win on the big stage and against the best teams. smart move all around.
 
Right now, I believe Liv should start the next game. I agree with something Oldude said prior to the Fort Hays State game: No one should lose or gain a starting spot based on their play in this exhibition game.
What about how they play in practice?
 
Shameful we're asking and responding to a question like this.
Liv has earned her right and contributed to a team we all know and love. Let's Go Liv!!!

The post shouldn't be about who should sit or start but more about the fact that we potentially have depth at a position we been lacking at since 2017. 17 and 18 classes was all perimeter players and it left us with a huge void. Liv shouldering the middle duties solo is a heavy burden, most wouldn't survive. Hopefully The young Post (DeBerry, Paith) learn from the Bermuda Triangle and help set the table for the next 4 years.

UCONN future is bright with the Bermuda Triangle (Liv, Aliyah, Dorka) sprinkled with DeBerry and Paith occasionally.
It is not shameful at all it is perfectly justified because this debate started long before Dorka decided to come to UCONN and was based on lack of "individual" development of Liv. Liv was a starter as a sophomore. Liv failed to make a sophomore leap in her development. Specifically she failed to play with better control so as not to pick up ticky tacky fouls and be available to her team at crunch time. More significantly, she failed to impact games against ranked opponents. Liv actually impacted more games as a freshman than she did as a sophomore the most notable of which was her swat of a Mabrey shot in the ND game which help to turned the tide of that game in UCONN's favor. I have heard/read all the possible arguments/excuses for Liv's lack of development. Your argument falls in to the category of she was the only post player and the burden was too heavy . Others have put forth the argument that post players take longer to develop. Still others view every critique as a criticism, piling on, or not being supportive enough. Last season the debate continued because in certain games freshman Aaliyah Edwards outplayed Junior Liv leaving many to opine that UCONN should go to a 4 guard 1 post offense and that 1 post should be Aaliyah because Aaliyah provided more of the the post presence that UCONN needed. The debate was bound to continue because of the way UCONN's season ended. Consider that freshman Aaliyah not only outplayed Liv in the Arizona game (more points & rebounds) but the 8 points Aaliyah scored in the Arizona game was only 1 less than the total points (9) that Liv scored in the last three games of UCONN's season. Dorka is just the latest chapter in this debate but let's be clear It was Liv's inability to become a reliable starter that first started the debate and allows it to continue. Personally I'm resigned and less optimistic about Liv finally turning a corner in this her senior season. I'm also resigned to the fact that Liv is a very good player and can be and has been a solid contributor to UCONN teams. I'm also resigned to the fact that in order for UCONN to win another championship more productivity will be required from the post position. I'm optimistic that Alliyah, Dorka & Liv can provide that productivity this season.
 
.-.
What about how they play in practice?
Since none of us have been at UConn’s practices, I guess we’ll just have to confine our opinions to what we’ve seen in the exhibition game.
 
Since none of us have been at UConn’s practices, I guess we’ll just have to confine our opinions to what we’ve seen in the exhibition game.
Dorka and Liv are NCAA seniors with close to 100 NCAA games played. We might want to consider those games in our opinions as well.
 
It is not shameful at all it is perfectly justified because this debate started long before Dorka decided to come to UCONN and was based on lack of "individual" development of Liv. Liv was a starter as a sophomore. Liv failed to make a sophomore leap in her development. Specifically she failed to play with better control so as not to pick up ticky tacky fouls and be available to her team at crunch time. More significantly, she failed to impact games against ranked opponents. Liv actually impacted more games as a freshman than she did as a sophomore the most notable of which was her swat of a Mabrey shot in the ND game which help to turned the tide of that game in UCONN's favor. I have heard/read all the possible arguments/excuses for Liv's lack of development. Your argument falls in to the category of she was the only post player and the burden was too heavy . Others have put forth the argument that post players take longer to develop. Still others view every critique as a criticism, piling on, or not being supportive enough. Last season the debate continued because in certain games freshman Aaliyah Edwards outplayed Junior Liv leaving many to opine that UCONN should go to a 4 guard 1 post offense and that 1 post should be Aaliyah because Aaliyah provided more of the the post presence that UCONN needed. The debate was bound to continue because of the way UCONN's season ended. Consider that freshman Aaliyah not only outplayed Liv in the Arizona game (more points & rebounds) but the 8 points Aaliyah scored in the Arizona game was only 1 less than the total points (9) that Liv scored in the last three games of UCONN's season. Dorka is just the latest chapter in this debate but let's be clear It was Liv's inability to become a reliable starter that first started the debate and allows it to continue. Personally I'm resigned and less optimistic about Liv finally turning a corner in this her senior season. I'm also resigned to the fact that Liv is a very good player and can be and has been a solid contributor to UCONN teams. I'm also resigned to the fact that in order for UCONN to win another championship more productivity will be required from the post position. I'm optimistic that Alliyah, Dorka & Liv can provide that productivity this season.
dang, that's sum good mulch right thar. nailed it.
 
I believe we all might share a concern about Dorka and her 54 percent career shooting at the free-throw line heading there down the stretch of a big game. However, it's noteworthy that Olivia's 55.8 is scarcely better. Let's hope they find an improved touch at the line this season, 'cause they're both likely to be spending a goodly share of time there.

This is my first post. I've read and enjoyed the BY's thoughtful, often humorous and, dare I say, sometimes both insightful and inciteful narratives. At my age, it's pretty cool to be a rookie at anything again!

By the way, as you might have gathered from the Deacon, I have an allegiance to Wake Forest. Yet rest assured, since the days of Lobo, Rizzotti & Co., come winter season my heart belongs to the Huskies
 
Dorka and Liv are NCAA seniors with close to 100 NCAA games played. We might want to consider those games in our opinions as well.
That’s fine. I’ve seen every UConn game that Liv has played in for the past 3 years. I will venture to guess there isn’t a single BY’er that’s watched more than a handful of Dorka’s games over the past 3 years.

I’ve watched 2 of Dorka’s games, both against UConn, one as a freshman and one as a sophomore. She was 2/8 & 0/4 from the arc as a freshman and 4/15 & 0/5 as a sophomore.

Since one of the criticisms of Liv is that she doesn’t show up in big games, I thought it was interesting that in arguably the biggest games of her first 2 years, Dorka struggled shooting the ball.

However, I have an open mind. I believe Dorka will be much better playing with UConn than playing against UConn.
 
.-.
I was at the game and had a close-up look at both Dorka and Liv. I can tell you for sure that Liv has a noticeably more muscular build than Dorka at this point. That is why I expect Liv to be a more effective rebounder against top competition than Dorka.

If Liv goes up for a rebound against Aliyah Boston, I think she will have a 50% chance of coming down with it. I wouldn't give Dorka more than a 30% chance in the same situation.

This board has often complained about Liv's supposedly slight, beanpole physique. That was accurate when she was a freshman, but it has been quite inaccurate for a long time now. But the caricature does seem to apply to Dorka as of now.

Before the exhibition game, Geno commented about how Dorka's conditioning isn't yet where it needs to be. I thought he was talking about her stamina, but now I think that he was also talking about her upper body strength.

So I expect that Dorka will play if the perimeter shooters aren't hitting and the team needs inside scoring. But if the offense is OK and the priority is clearing the defensive boards, then I think Liv will get more minutes.
 
Has there ever been a player that receives such disrespect from UConn fans than live?? And @Fairfield Fan sayin Piath and DeBerry looked better than Liv in the game and my be better at the of the year. Ya'll talk about the Tennessee fans really need to look in the mirror. And ya may need your UConn fan card taken away!!
It's not good, but it doesn't come close to comparing to what it was like back in the day with Conlon.
 
I was at the game and had a close-up look at both Dorka and Liv. I can tell you for sure that Liv has a noticeably more muscular build than Dorka at this point. That is why I expect Liv to be a more effective rebounder against top competition than Dorka.

If Liv goes up for a rebound against Aliyah Boston, I think she will have a 50% chance of coming down with it. I wouldn't give Dorka more than a 30% chance in the same situation.

This board has often complained about Liv's supposedly slight, beanpole physique. That was accurate when she was a freshman, but it has been quite inaccurate for a long time now. But the caricature does seem to apply to Dorka as of now.

Before the exhibition game, Geno commented about how Dorka's conditioning isn't yet where it needs to be. I thought he was talking about her stamina, but now I think that he was also talking about her upper body strength.

So I expect that Dorka will play if the perimeter shooters aren't hitting and the team needs inside scoring. But if the offense is OK and the priority is clearing the defensive boards, then I think Liv will get more minutes.
Both Geno and Dorka talked about a thigh bruise which effected her conditioning and "ability to get up and down the court"=conditioning issue for a few weeks of practice.
 
.-.
The whole Liv/Dorka saga reminds me of the early 80's when Cedric Maxwell started and Kevin McHale came off the bench. They each had different skill sets and were valuable in their own way. Maxwell did a lot of the dirty work underneath and McHale had the long reach and post up moves that made his shots extremely tough to block. Maxwell was the incumbent and was a valuable player for many years so continued to start after McHale was drafted and McHale came off the bench even though most would argue that McHale, who made the HOF and 75-year anniversary team, was the better player and was a matchup nightmare for the opposition.
I actually liked it because if the Celtics were behind, McHale could come off the bench and spark them and get them back in the game. If they were doing well, he kept the momentum going. So for me, even though I may be partial to Dorka, I'm OK with her coming off the bench for similar reasons. Not going well: in comes Dorka to spark things. Things going well: no momentum lost when Dorka comes in. On top of Dorka we'll have Azzi and Nika coming off the bench as well.
Last year when we were down 10 early to AZ we were left wondering (and wondering) how we'd get back in the game. This year with players like Dorka, Azzi, Nika (and even Caroline) coming off the bench I don't think we'd have the same worries.
 
Earned her right to what?
Her right to play whatever position/status her coach determines she should play without constantly being put down by fair weather fans who can’t wait to see her replaced by the newer, shinier toy that has come along. May I remind everyone that Geno (he of the 11 national championships) will decide who starts and how many minutes etc, etc! Good lord, some on this board just seem so unaware that we don’t see most of what he sees and have no idea of all the intangibles and personalities and chemistry issues that have to be blended together to produce all those championships! Can’t we all just trust Geno et al and enjoy this season? Whether Dorka starts or not has zero to do with whether we win the NC this season! She is going to get lots of minutes and will likely be a key piece in a potential championship! Isn’t that enough?
 
Her right to play whatever position/status her coach determines she should play without constantly being put down by fair weather fans who can’t wait to see her replaced by the newer, shinier toy that has come along. May I remind everyone that Geno (he of the 11 national championships) will decide who starts and how many minutes etc, etc! Good lord, some on this board just seem so unaware that we don’t see most of what he sees and have no idea of all the intangibles and personalities and chemistry issues that have to be blended together to produce all those championships! Can’t we all just trust Geno et al and enjoy this season? Whether Dorka starts or not has zero to do with whether we win the NC this season! She is going to get lots of minutes and will likely be a key piece in a potential championship! Isn’t that enough?
I agree with your sentiments re: Liv and Dorka, as I've expressed here, but I disagree with the general premise that we cannot have discussions on this board regarding any and all things UConn WCBB. (as long as we're respectful toward the players and observant of the rules of the BY) To me, without fun discussions, there's no point in the board or in commenting on the board. One can just use the board for information, like schedules, start times, where to watch the games, etc.
Do comments pro or con have to be prefaced with " Geno, 11 championships, blahtty, blahty...". We all know that. We can still talk hoops.
 
Dorka and Liv are NCAA seniors with close to 100 NCAA games played. We might want to consider those games in our opinions as well.
I posted this in the other Dorka thread going at the same time, but it's relevant to your point, so here it is again.

Career numbers over three years:

Liv
Games - 100
Total pts - 876
Total 2pts - 360-640 720pts
Total 3pts - 4-22 12pts
FT% - 55.8 144pts

Dorka
Games - 75
Total pts - 975
Total 2pts - 312-579 624pts
Total 3pts - 70-231 210pts
FT% - .54 141pts
 
Her right to play whatever position/status her coach determines she should play without constantly being put down by fair weather fans who can’t wait to see her replaced by the newer, shinier toy that has come along. May I remind everyone that Geno (he of the 11 national championships) will decide who starts and how many minutes etc, etc! Good lord, some on this board just seem so unaware that we don’t see most of what he sees and have no idea of all the intangibles and personalities and chemistry issues that have to be blended together to produce all those championships! Can’t we all just trust Geno et al and enjoy this season? Whether Dorka starts or not has zero to do with whether we win the NC this season! She is going to get lots of minutes and will likely be a key piece in a potential championship! Isn’t that enough?
Us fair weather fans are keenly aware that Geno will decide who starts and how many championships he has won and need no reminder. Our trust in Geno is also not an issue here or the subject of this thread. Not only do I disagree with you that Dorka starting will have "zero" to do with whether UCONN wins another championship this season, I think Dorka should start and she will be a major factor in UCONN winning or not this season. Fell free to disagree if you want, that was kind of the idea of this entire thread. Just don't resort to the name calling and the incredibly lame stance that Geno knows best and we should trust him or else we are fair weather fans. BTW personally I like "newer shinier" toys. But that kind of implies that the other toys are older and less shiny=dull. Let's just make sure that we are only talking about toys here and not players because the implications of your analogy would be kind of rude.
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,535
Messages
4,580,906
Members
10,491
Latest member
7774Forever


Top Bottom