- Joined
- Jan 15, 2023
- Messages
- 39
- Reaction Score
- 174
Imagine if he cut Jackson’s minutes in half? He might if won the game. Crazy righr?Nope. I’m a Hurley critic. But players gotta play, Hurley set us up for a win today
Imagine if he cut Jackson’s minutes in half? He might if won the game. Crazy righr?Nope. I’m a Hurley critic. But players gotta play, Hurley set us up for a win today
You are correct. It's the same posters who haven't come out in a few weeks since the last time we lostI'm not bothering to read this thread. I'm sure it's 80% octogenarians that only come out of the woodwork after losses.
Part of the reason Newton didn't give us anything is because Jackson demands 0 respect on offense and allows the other team to play 4v5. Jackson just kept shooting us into a hole because for the majority of the game, we could not get an open look.
I can understand this point of view.Bc Jackson’s defender was standing under the basket. Where could Newton go?
I’m seeing 5+ before Georgetown and 4.5 since and drops to 4 if you get rid of 11? For Marquette? The point is we don’t seem to be playing “big” in the Big East like we did preconference.2.5 per game in the 14-0 stretch, and 4.0 per game since
![]()
2022-23 UConn Huskies Men's Gamelogs | College Basketball at Sports-Reference.com
Check out the detailed 2022-23 UConn Huskies Gamelogs for College Basketball at Sports-Reference.comwww.sports-reference.com
Teams sag off of Jackson more than Sanogo. This is aJacksoncoaching/Hurley issue. Fixed it for you. We've seen it 1,000 times, Dan Hurley has to plan for it and adjust.
He wouldn’t have been worse than Newton, if that’s your questionok . Do you think gaffney would’ve helped?
True. But, all game long, the physicality that Hawkins put on Alexander was ignored, but was conveniently quickly whistled on that play. But there is no reason, Hawkins was not coached to understand the consequence of a quick/tight whistle would have on the game.Woulda been nice to have those 20 seconds we let drain off the clock.
Offensively, yes. But overall? Not so much.He played Ajax too much when he he didn't have and had better options
Creighton is a really good defensive team and playing 4 on 5 offense is hard as hell. I was hoping we had maybe turned the corner with the way we're using Sanogo and Jackson on offense. This was a continuation of Sanogo being used the right way and a huge regression of Jackson being used the wrong way.He was played tight by their guards and when he drove there was always help defense because Scheierman was always near the rim since he was 15 feet off Jackson. I don't think individually Alleyne is significantly better than Jackson but I just feel like the offense will flow so much better with him in there instead.
You're seeing wrong, 33 blocks in the 13 games up to GeorgetownI’m seeing 5+ before Georgetown and 4.5 since and drops to 4 if you get rid of 11? For Marquette? The point is we don’t seem to be playing “big” in the Big East like we did preconference.
Ok. But players can have bad games. The strategy to play AJ that many meaningful minutes is something we can control.And we lost by 3. If Newton gives us ANYTHING we win. We can agree Jackson should’ve been benched tonight for Alleyne. But the game was still there for the taking.
Meh.People keep bringing up Marquette blow out...anyone notice Jackson played only 23 minutes, shot 5 shots. That's what needs to happen every game. Match him up as much as possible on defensive side ONLY. If hes on the side of offense its essentially 5 on 4 and hurts out shooters/playmakers. Hurley needs to figure this out more and he should never play more than 25 minutes a game unless absolutely necessary. Think about it, if he play close to 30 minutes (28 today) in a 40 minute game thats essentially only 12 minutes of actual HARD defense the other team needs to play.
Alleyne’s defender wasn’t sitting under the basket and Alleyne was playing much much better than Jackson.John silver is a moron. Alleyne and Jackson both shooting 29% from 3 this year. Next?!
Don't be that guy.I'm not bothering to read this thread. I'm sure it's 80% octogenarians that only come out of the woodwork after losses.
Another loss and it’s on Hurley. Example A for the 10000000000th time
it was clear within the first 5 minutes that Jackson didn't have it on either end today and Hurley did nothing about it. He just let the same thing happen over and over again.Ok. But players can have bad games. The strategy to play AJ that many meaningful minutes is something we can control.
This is such a bad post from an otherwise knowledgeable poster. AJ took twice as many shots today than Tuesday. Take away the dunks, it’s almost 4x. Nothing else needs to be said.I don’t think Jackson is why we lost. He played the exact same way he played against Marquette. The barometer is Tristan Newton. He legit didn’t show up
Sanogo was the only one who showed up.
Who did he cool today?Because nothings changed. . No in game adjustments. He cools players off when they’re playing well.
Was thinking the same thing. This board would seriously melt down if we made the title game but lost.This thread is longer than the great Marquette win post game thread in 18 minutes. This board really knows how to revel in misery
Another loss and it’s on Hurley. Example A for the 10000000000th time